Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,963 posts)
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 01:42 PM Aug 2012

James Fallows just rips Niall Ferguson to shreds. This is a thing of beauty.

As a Harvard Alum, I Apologize

inShare
3 AUG 20 2012, 12:00 PM ET

Yes, I know, you could imagine many sentences that would follow that headline. But here is what I have in mind right now: A tenured professor of history at my undergraduate alma mater has written a cover story for Daily Beast/Newsweek that is so careless and unconvincing that I wonder how he will presume to sit in judgment of the next set of student papers he has to grade. It's by the irrepressible Niall Ferguson, it is headlined "Obama's Gotta Go," .........

...................

Again, anyone can be wrong, and I often have been. But scholars are supposed to be different from mere pamphleteers and journalists. We give the judgments of academics -- like those of doctors, scientists, renowned jurists, etc. -- extra weight because we assume that they have considered evidence, precedent, and probabilities more carefully before offering conclusions. Think: E.O. Wilson on ants and ecological patterns more broadly.

The big claims and conclusions Ferguson has offered in recent years, with the extra authority of his academic standing, have been attention-getting and mostly wrong. Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider has an analysis here (and please also see this from Noah Smith). For instance:
- U.S. budget deficits were going to lead to a US-China breakup. They didn't.
- U.S. budget deficits were going to drive bond rates sky high. The opposite has occurred.
- U.S. budget deficits will make us like Greece. They have not.
- A year ago, Ferguson warned that we were on the verge of a damaging new round of inflation. We were not.

You can say these things if you're a talk-show host or a combatant on some cable-news gabfest. To me this is not what the tradition of Veritas and the search for scholarly enlightenment is supposed to exemplify. Seriously, I wonder if one of Ferguson's students will have the panache to turn in a similar paper to see how it fares.

THE REST (REALLY GOOD!):
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/as-a-harvard-alum-i-apologize/261308/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
James Fallows just rips Niall Ferguson to shreds. This is a thing of beauty. (Original Post) kpete Aug 2012 OP
good. let it be shredded. t hat was an obnoxiously wrong cover. nt seabeyond Aug 2012 #1
This was fun BeyondGeography Aug 2012 #2
That is deeply funny. Nice catch! nt DCKit Aug 2012 #3
If one ever wants proof that Ivy league profs aren't always "The Best and Brightest" n2doc Aug 2012 #4

BeyondGeography

(39,347 posts)
2. This was fun
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 02:05 PM
Aug 2012
- "Remarkably the president polls relatively strongly on national security."

Remarkably the name Osama bin Laden does not appear in this article.


n2doc

(47,953 posts)
4. If one ever wants proof that Ivy league profs aren't always "The Best and Brightest"
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 02:29 PM
Aug 2012

Exhibit A would be Ferguson....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»James Fallows just rips N...