Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:40 PM Jan 2012

WH: TODAY the President will appoint Richard Cordray to lead Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

posted on the White House blog by Dan Pfeiffer on January 04, 2012 at 10:45 AM EST


TODAY the President will appoint Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He has one important job: look out for the best interest of American consumers. He’ll work on behalf of millions of families across the nation to ensure they’re not being taken advantage of by debt collectors and credit reporting agencies. As America’s consumer watchdog, Cordray will work to ensure that families and students don’t get saddled with sky-high interest rates by mortgage or payday lenders. Bottom line: he’ll strengthen oversight and accountability in order to protect millions of families across the nation. This is an important step to protect the American people.

The President nominated Mr. Cordray last summer. Unfortunately, Republicans in the Senate blocked his confirmation. They refused to let the Senate go forward with an up or down vote. It’s not because Republicans think Cordray isn’t qualified for the job, they simply believe that the American public doesn’t need a watchdog at all. Well, we disagree.

And we can’t wait for Republicans in the Senate to act. Now, you might hear some folks across the aisle criticize this “recess appointment.” It’s probably the same folks who don’t think we need a tough consumer watchdog in the first place. Those critics might tell you that Wall Street should write their own rules. Or you might hear them say the American people are better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves. Again, we disagree with those critics.

Here are the facts: The Constitution gives the President the authority to make temporary recess appointments to fill vacant positions when the Senate is in recess, a power all recent Presidents have exercised. The Senate has effectively been in recess for weeks, and is expected to remain in recess for weeks. In an overt attempt to prevent the President from exercising his authority during this period, Republican Senators insisted on using a gimmick called “pro forma” sessions, which are sessions during which no Senate business is conducted and instead one or two Senators simply gavel in and out of session in a matter of seconds. But gimmicks do not override the President’s constitutional authority to make appointments to keep the government running. Legal experts agree. In fact, the lawyers who advised President Bush on recess appointments wrote that the Senate cannot use sham “pro forma” sessions to prevent the President from exercising a constitutional power.

Because of the President’s leadership and decisive action, the American people will have a consumer watchdog fighting tooth and nail on their behalf. The President knows this is a make or break moment for the middle class and he’ll continue to build an economy that’s based on the values of fairness and shared responsibility. Today’s announcement is a critical piece to strengthen the economy and restore the economic security for the middle class and those trying to reach it. Mr. Cordray is the right man for the job and we’re pleased he’s finally in place to continue his important work.


read: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/04/americas-consumer-watchdog

Dan Pfeiffer is White House Communications Director

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WH: TODAY the President will appoint Richard Cordray to lead Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Original Post) bigtree Jan 2012 OP
Is this really the place to go for legal opinions? zipplewrath Jan 2012 #1
of course, you should understand that it's a political comparison bigtree Jan 2012 #2
Which one of those lawyers was a Bush* lawyer? Bandit Jan 2012 #3
they didn't rely on the bush lawyer to make the judgement for them bigtree Jan 2012 #4
Actually, I don't think they did zipplewrath Jan 2012 #5
well, you should get the context bigtree Jan 2012 #6
I did say "quoting" zipplewrath Jan 2012 #8
correct. the reference to the bush admin lawyers was a political point onenote Jan 2012 #7

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
1. Is this really the place to go for legal opinions?
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:46 PM
Jan 2012
"In fact, the lawyers who advised President Bush on recess appointments wrote that the Senate cannot use sham “pro forma” sessions to prevent the President from exercising a constitutional power."

Really? We're quoting Bush lawyers now? Are these the same lawyers that said torture was okay?

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
2. of course, you should understand that it's a political comparison
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:49 PM
Jan 2012

. . . made here for the benefit of countering the republican critics (and others) who are saying that the move is unprecedented.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
3. Which one of those lawyers was a Bush* lawyer?
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:53 PM
Jan 2012

I was under the impression Obama had his own Legal Team and they were quite different than those that were in the Bush* Administration...

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
4. they didn't rely on the bush lawyer to make the judgement for them
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jan 2012

The WH communications director is making the political point that Bush did it too.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
5. Actually, I don't think they did
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 03:49 PM
Jan 2012

He was advised that he could, but I don't think he ever did a recess appointment during a pro-forma session.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
6. well, you should get the context
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jan 2012

. . . nothing says they consulted a Bush lawyer. It's just used here as a political point.

onenote

(42,685 posts)
7. correct. the reference to the bush admin lawyers was a political point
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jan 2012

What is particularly entertaining is that the link on the WH page that accompanies the reference to the bush lawyers is to an op-ed that those lawyers wrote in 2010 urging Obama to call the Senate's bluff.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101405441.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WH: TODAY the President w...