Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA wealth tax could raise trillions -- and save our democracy
BY CHUCK COLLINS, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR 01/31/19 07:00 AM EST
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has jolted the body politic with a bold proposal to tax the concentrated wealth of the richest 75,000 households in the United States. Its about time someone took up this mantle.
Warrens proposal would levy an annual 2 percent tax on wealth over $50 million, with the rate rising to 3 percent on wealth over $1 billion. Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest man in the country, would pay $4.1 billion under the new tax.
The United States has a proud tradition of breaking up concentrated wealth. The first federal progressive income and estate taxes date from the first Gilded Age, over a century ago. Thats when President Theodore Roosevelt observed, Of all forms of tyranny, the least attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy.
The wealth tax that Warren proposes would raise substantial revenue by one estimate almost $3 trillion in the next decade. This would be a substantial boost for spending on green infrastructure, affordable higher education, and other investments that could expand opportunity.
But more fundamentally, the tax would be an investment in protecting democracy from the tyranny of a plutocracy that worried Roosevelt.
Warrens proposal would levy an annual 2 percent tax on wealth over $50 million, with the rate rising to 3 percent on wealth over $1 billion. Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest man in the country, would pay $4.1 billion under the new tax.
The United States has a proud tradition of breaking up concentrated wealth. The first federal progressive income and estate taxes date from the first Gilded Age, over a century ago. Thats when President Theodore Roosevelt observed, Of all forms of tyranny, the least attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy.
The wealth tax that Warren proposes would raise substantial revenue by one estimate almost $3 trillion in the next decade. This would be a substantial boost for spending on green infrastructure, affordable higher education, and other investments that could expand opportunity.
But more fundamentally, the tax would be an investment in protecting democracy from the tyranny of a plutocracy that worried Roosevelt.
https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/427315-a-wealth-tax-could-raise-trillions-and-save-our-democracy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 600 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A wealth tax could raise trillions -- and save our democracy (Original Post)
workinclasszero
Feb 2019
OP
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)1. It's a start
I would like to see it higher
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)2. Exactly
It's a start.
The cap on social security taxes, $128,400 I believe, needs to be totally removed for one thing.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)3. Trump proposed a one time tax of 14.5% on wealth exceeding $10 million
1999, to pay off the national debt. Warren has a more modest proposal.