General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhile we're cleaning house, it's time for Tulsi Gabbard to resign.
If the standard by which an elected official keeps their job includes past harmful actions or statements, then Rep. Gabbard must be held to that same standard.
In a 1992 interview, she stated that Homosexuality is not normal, not healthy, morally and scripturally wrong,
She worked for her father's organization - The Alliance for Traditional Marriage - which supported the use of conversion therapy to try to turn kids straight.
She once blasted homosexual activists for trying to force their values down the throats of the children in our schools.
During her successful run for the Hawaii Legislature in 2002 she vowed to pass a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.
All of the above is cribbed from here: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/16/18182114/tulsi-gabbard-2020-president-campaign-explained
She did great harm to the LGBTQ community and, despite her recent mea culpas, must be held to account for her past behavior.
Please, let's be consistent in our demands.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And in a similar vein,
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211785465
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)If there is to be a purge, then it must include every transgressor, and the punishment must be consistent.
If not, they should shut the fuck up already.
Cha
(297,180 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)msongs
(67,398 posts)polices.
kwolf68
(7,365 posts)Is it possible people change? She has apologized. So we take a strong, unique voice from the Democratic side and lets just get rid of it? I don't get it.
What is she NOW doing on behalf of the gay community?
Her 0% voting record from the Family Research Council would tell me that she's advocating quite well for their position.
She has 92%-100% from the Human Rights campaign and also enjoys a 100% voting record from Americans for Separation of Church and State telling me she has certainly been enlightened on this issue.
Were people calling for Bob Byrd to resign despite the fact he is a KKK Grand Wizard? No, Democrats accepted his apology and decided how to proceed with him based on HOW he actually voted and what he did for the American people. People grow, they learn. Gabbard's dumbass statements in an interview from 19-freaking-92 pales in comparison to actual policy she now supports ON BEHALF of the gay community, votes / support that are ANYTHING but "great harm".
Her voting record is STRONGLY Liberal on issues of social liberalism.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)It doesn't matter what one is doing now. What's past is prologue.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Got any other bromides?
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)Cha
(297,180 posts)LGBT community is just as bad as Gov Northam's racist idiocy.
These are statements of her political positions, which are directly relevant to her job as a politician
I have not heard any arguments that Northam's blackface has had an impact on his current political actions.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Cha
(297,180 posts)Cha
(297,180 posts)just hurtful to see that Blackface and KKK sheet for many people, and I didn't want to take away from that.
But, you're right
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)kwolf68
(7,365 posts)She will face the voters in 2020, it's their decision if she needs "to go"
bitterross
(4,066 posts)Same standard should apply.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)No one can be governor of Virginia for more than one term.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)The people who should resign are the ones that vote for war and arms sales.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)What's your point?
former9thward
(31,987 posts)Please tell me who has not voted for either one.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)at least in part because she refused to help them pass marriage equality in 2013. Mazie Hirono and Brian Schatz did help them.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)Since it seems our collective standard is punish every person who had misdeeds then Gabbard must go.
ZeroSomeBrains
(638 posts)As for resigning from Congress. I would be fine with that. Her anti-gay positions were reprehensible and you didn't even bring up her positions on torture and supporting Assad in Syria. I would say she has a lot more to apologize for than say Elizabeth Warren.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)As I stated, she did harm to the LGBTQ community. Certainly more so than a young Republican dressing in blackface at a private function.
I'm not drawing any false equivalencies, however. If one is reprehensible, all are reprehensible. Either we forgive and forget or bring out the long knives. Scanning this site in the past few days, it would appear that that decision is being made for us. So be it.
Cha
(297,180 posts)Link to tweet
Seems to favor putin over President Obama..
Link to tweet
By this point, Democratic leadership considered her disloyal. Rep. Gabbard loses me and, I think, many others when she claims to support peaceful values and policies that protect civilians and still engages with and even defends a murderous dictator, Bashar al-Assad, Loren DeJonge Schulman, a senior NSC official in the Obama administration, told me. There is no excuse for this. The hypocrisy of these actions is astonishing. One can be antiwar without being pro-murderous dictator, a fact that seems obvious.
When Assads forces used chemical weapons against Syrian civilians in April 2017, Gabbard said she was skeptical that Assad was responsible, aligning herself with conspiracy theorists against both US intelligence and the overwhelming majority of independent experts.
Mahalo for this, Oilem.. one of the best comprehensive articles on Gabbard I've seen. If not the best.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)brooklynite
(94,513 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Have you lost the script?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)on the spurious basis that it was a state, not federal, issue.
By contrast, Mazie Hirono and Brian Schatz DID help.
And in 2015, in an interview, she said that she had changed her political position on LGBT as a result of her military experience, but she hadn't changed her personal view.
theboss
(10,491 posts)I disagree with her on a million things, but she keeps getting elected with a D by her name.
Find an example of her gay-bashing and I'm in.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Nothing stopping you from reading it again.
Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #22)
Post removed
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)You've made it clear that "you don't like rapists and racists". Homophobes though? Meh, not so much.
theboss
(10,491 posts)And keeps winning.
If Northam had said, I wore blackface, and then won the governorship, I would be in favor of him completing his term. Elections have consequences, and I believe in that.
What I don't like is discovering horrible shit about people after they were elected.
The best defense of Ted Kennedy post-Chappaquidick was simply, The voters have had their say repeatedly.
Admittedly, it's not a great defense, but like everyone else, I'm making this up as I go, because everyone apparently sucks.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I happen to believe that LGBTQ people were meant to be LGBTQ and they are no less legitimate than I am. So, I have a belief that drives what policies I want to see enacted into law. I think that the vast majority of democrats agree with my "general belief" and have some say as to whether Gabbard is suitable as a Democratic Party nominee.
theboss
(10,491 posts)But I feel like she gets the same pass that asshole steve king gets.
If the voters know that you are an awful person - and keep voting for you - it changes the discussion.
It Beto had won, I wouldnt demand he resign over the DUIs.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)One DUI in 1998, not DUIs. I'm sure you knew that but just made it plural DUIs as a mistake.
watoos
(7,142 posts)I can find something he or she said or did that is harmful. C'mon everyone let's play the game called eating our own.
The only way we lose in 2020 is if we fight among ourselves.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,283 posts)until a long list of republicans resign, starting with Trump.
Liberty Belle
(9,534 posts)The person's voting record and recent actions are the most relevant thing. As long as they have been voting in line with Democratic party principals, we should forgive past transgressions. If we allow Republicans to convince us to throw out everyone with any skeleton in their closet, They are likely to be replaced by Republicans in some places and we could lose some people with decades of good service standing up for the rights of minorities, gays, women, etc.
There are MANY people whose views have evolved on these issues includiing Barack Obama. If anyone who ever opposed or had concerns about gay marriages was forced to resign, he would not have finished his term. Yet he did much to advance civil rights for LGTB people.
Particularly when a transgression was merely someone posing for a photo in high school or college, decades ago, that should not be the sole defining moment of their career. If voters really don't like it, they can vote them out next election.
Resigning also forces a high financial burden on taxpayers to fund a special election, so should be limited only to severe voilations committed while the person is in office, unless it's an actual crime for which they can be removed from office.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)I will not, in any way, shape or form call for a fellow Democrat to resign. Nobody is perfect, and some have made big mistakes but if we are going to keep the fascists from completely destroying this country we need unity now, not division. I'm including independents that vote with Dems also, we need them all.
George II
(67,782 posts)....can vote her out next year.
What's mind boggling is that, with her history and policy positions, she's trying to become OUR nominee for president next year.
Texin
(2,596 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Just a hunch.