General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is Roger Stone being handled ,,,,,,with Kidd Gloves,,,,,?????
by the Court????? Send the Marshalls to get this shit-hole and drag him to the bench!
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Court sessions are scheduled, often well in advance. They'll have to "make time" for this as it is.
(Which, by the by, is a really good way to piss off a judge in the first place).
lark
(23,091 posts)That's pretty damn quick and show's she's pissed - as she should be. He deliberately targeted her and I hope she will
LOCK HIM UP!!
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)May even limit his access to computers.
lark
(23,091 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)I really think he's going to jail. Probably about 3 months. Just have to wait for the eventual trial. Question is, will Trump commute his sentence.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)if it was POC with an court appointed lawyer, it would not be "its not how its done"
Wasicu Justice system,,,,,,
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)But my experience with the court is that they tend not to rush anything through. The lone exceptions are initial hearings which pretty much go on continuously around here (well into the night anyway). Mostly so they can clear the jails of people who aren't going to be held after bail.
More likely version of which you allude is that the POC person wouldn't be out on bail to begin with.
Grasswire2
(13,568 posts)That's what I have seen expressed -- that he wants her to react in a way that forces her to step aside.
Or.........he's performing for an audience of one who likely is loving his theater.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)You don't win legal points by attacking a judge then saying she's biased because you attacked her.
Zoonart
(11,849 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Campaign blitz by Stone's Legal team. This is what this stunt by Stone was all about,change of Venue and thus a different Judge.
After today's special Minute Order,does that mean Old Roger Boy can be arrested on site if he does another stunt?
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Stone's legal team seems to have been pretty freaked out by the Instagram posting. They filed a NOTICE OF APOLOGY for the posting which is something lawyers never do. Professionals have said over and over since yesterday that this notice is unprecedented. They knew their client had crossed the line and that put them in dangerous territory with the Court.
Judge Jackson is pretty pissed and that's why she ordered Thursday's hearing. Given how she treated Manafort for his nonsense in her court, I wouldn't bet on Stone's chances of maintaining the status quo. Hell, I could see her jailing him because she specifically told him that his media manipulations would hurt him in her court. That's what she did to Manafort, albeit for different reasons.
We'll find out on Thursday.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)NYT Story about Cohen Judge Attempt change by Trump via Whitaker,now this Stone Stunt. Roger Stones History is replead with this kind of crap. Only this time it blew up in his face as well as Trump's face.
Nothing happens in a Vacuum when it comes to dirty Politics.
Sure hope Roger Boy shows up at his hearing with what is called a Jump Bag.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)She's had no problem speaking her mind in both the Manafort and the Stone cases. She certainly ripped Manfort a new one. I look forward to hearing her thoughts about Stone's stunt on Thursday. It's a very good bet that she's pissed.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)call Federal Judges the "eight-hundred pound gorilla".
flotsam
(3,268 posts)have 5 fingers on one hand and a hole for your hook on the other? I may have confused these with Hook gloves...
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)(a)(1) Whoever--
...
(B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section,
with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
...
(4) A threat made in violation of this section shall be punished by a fine under this title or imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years, or both, except that imprisonment for a threatened assault shall not exceed 6 years.
Moral: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw Roger Stones.