General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm beginning to warm up to a Joe Biden run.
He's not my first, second, or third choice but beating Trump is a moral imperative.
The rest is commentary...
mainer
(12,022 posts)And I've come to distrust Sanders.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)...meaningless at this juncture.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The fact that Bernie is trailing Trump by 12 in NC and AZ, states we should at least be competitive in, and he could be our nominee scares the shit out of me.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)From my interactions with sane R's in NC, Trump is viewed as keeping his promises (somewhat). That's why he has good support among his base.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)A senatorial election, Roy Cooper will probably run for a second term, the R's electoral shenanigans have been exposed in southern NC, Trump's negatives still outweigh his positives.... Forced redraw of the electoral map ... It should be a D season.
onetexan
(13,036 posts)If we can win in NC (ala Cooper) we can win nationally
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Sanders has no shot at becoming our nominee. As I posted yesterday:
Sanders won't be in a 1-on-1 race, and he won't be running against someone who millions had been conditioned to hate over a period of decades. 2016 was tailor-made for Sanders. He was the only option for the anti-Clinton crowd.
2nd in Iowa and 1st in New Hampshire propelled Sanders forward. I don't see him doing as well in those states in 2020, even as they remain 2 of the whitest and most rural states in the US (how wonderful that we give undue influence to a couple of states that don't remotely reflect our electorate). If he does relatively poorly in Iowa and doesn't win New Hampshire, it'll be quite embarrassing for him. So much so that I could see him dropping out before South Carolina, if not before Nevada.
And Super Tuesday, assuming he hasn't already dropped out, will be even worse for him than it was in 2016. He'll lose badly in nearly every contest that takes place on March 3, 2020. Not to mention South Carolina 3 days earlier.
Plus, there will be fewer caucuses.
Anyway, he'll find it much tougher to justify sticking around, and I suspect there will be quite a bit of pressure on him to leave the race (including pressure from within his camp).
That there are people who seriously think he's a contender, or even the favorite, is dumbfounding. Reality will provide a swift smack.
As for Biden, now 76, there are reasons why he has come up way short of becoming our nominee in his previous attempts (plural). Pre-Obama Biden was never all that popular with our electorate. It remains to be seen if he can do as well in the primary as some seem to think he can. He's gaffe-prone among other things.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)That means he's essentially done after New Hampshire. Seriously, that's basically the end of the line for Sanders. Vermont and its 16 delegates won't save him on Super Tuesday.
And he has continued to stick his foot in his mouth with regard to matters of racism and sexism. He just can't help himself.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)I feel like Bernie has a large core of supporters. In a 2 person contest like 2016, his core wasnt large enough to best Clinton.
But, if Bernie keeps most of his core, and the remaining primary voters are split between two or three other viable candidates, he could very will win with a plurality.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Secondly, Sanders would have to do much, much better among POC and non-millennial women in order to have a chance. I don't see any reason to think that he will.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)I could be wrong but I could easily see Bernie winning if hes up against more than one other candidste. Even two would give him a great shot if he keeps most of his core. POCs and women splitting their vote between Kamala and Warren, while Bernie keeps his young / white core... I dont know, it just seems way too early to write him off.
Personally I am most enthusiastic about Kamala. She seems to have whar Im looking for in a serious candidate.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And Biden would hurt both Sanders and Warren in New England.
onetexan
(13,036 posts)When he declared he wasnt a Dem after the general election. His base w not be as large.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)That's why we knew by Super Tuesday of 2016 that the race was essentially over.
awesomerwb1
(4,267 posts)I would like Joe to run and win with a female VP. Universe forbid any health issues or something, but then we'd have a female President.
Of course I'd prefer Mr Mueller to "run".
handmade34
(22,756 posts)always been my 1st... he would be an excellent President
https://www.americanpossibilities.org/
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)works for me.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)But I'm in DU's horrible Ageist Faction.
Response to maxsolomon (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Not real big on the idea of having an 80-year-old president. If that makes an ageist, then whatever.
bluestarone
(16,906 posts)I want to know the complete story. Whom they ALL chose for running mate! Gonna be a LONG two years!!!
CrossingTheRubicon
(731 posts)Joe Biden is the Democrat who is by far the ablest to defeat Trump in the EC.
Many potential nominees could win the popular vote. But that's not how we elect presidents in this country.
2020 is a great chance to elevate a young liberal Democrat to be Vice President, with a great liberal at the top of the ticket.
Let's be smart. Let's win!
(I caught the Rabbi Hillel reference, BTW)
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,722 posts)you don't say?
Gooooo Joe!!!!!
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)than fine with Joe.
Kahuna7
(2,531 posts)Link to tweet
2020 Ballot:
Trump 45% v. @JoeBiden 55%
Trump 47% v. @ewarren 53%
Trump 49% v. @SenSanders 51%
Trump 48% v. @KamalaHarris 52%
Trump 47% v. @BetoORourke 53%
Trump 49% v. @amyklobuchar 51%
Trump 49% v. @CoryBooker 51%
Trump 48% v. @SherrodBrown 52%
peggysue2
(10,828 posts)he needs to make up his mind to commit or not. The ongoing flirtation--he will/he won't--is already getting old and he'll need the fund-raising base, donors and campaign people in place before those elements are tapped by other campaigns. Though all of this is happening way too early, it is happening. Joey needs to jump on the train. Or not.
That being said, Biden can beat Trump by cutting into his base and has the chops to get the country back on track while healing our international relations. With a young, up-and-coming VP candidate, this is a winning ticket.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)though I'd prefer Biden/Beto
Sugarcoated
(7,722 posts)All winners
Vinca
(50,267 posts)get dragged into the spotlight 24/7. They'll be the Clarence Thomas hearings, the foot-in-mouth disease, etc. Personally, I think the way Anita Hill was treated back then is a huge deal when it comes to a presidential run. At least it used to be a big deal. Everything is relative when you have an admitted "pussy grabber" sitting in the White House. Don't get me wrong. I like Joe and would have no problem voting for him, but he's not among my favorites in the race. I honestly wish both Joe and Bernie would sit this one out and give the younger generation a shot.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)"When the facts change, my opinion changes. What do you do, sir?"