Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gee, maybe Democrats should request articles about trump* be added, too (Original Post) Siwsan Feb 2019 OP
They seem to have gone on the Google machine during the break. madaboutharry Feb 2019 #1
There would be enough articles about tRUmp to fill an entire office building meow2u3 Feb 2019 #2
........... BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #4
Cummings already did at least one BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #3
The look on Cohen's face was like wtf...why Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2019 #6
He's probably aware of some of these articles BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #7
I agree! That was just a show. And no objections Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2019 #5
Remember there are/were other hearings BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #8
Yes, that's true. But public watching today...if we Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2019 #10
I doubt that would happen BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #11
Well that's the hope for impeachment as well... Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2019 #14
Gotta hit them from every angle BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #16
They are running out of material. They want to ask more, GulfCoast66 Feb 2019 #9
Very good points. lunatica Feb 2019 #13
Ya, get that. But open end on anything else where Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2019 #15
Notice how they wanted "Fake News" WaPo articles a lot. nt Baltimike Feb 2019 #12

BumRushDaShow

(128,863 posts)
3. Cummings already did at least one
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:10 PM
Feb 2019

right after Meadows whined about putting a couple in. The one Cummings added was to refute the Salon article that Meadows submitted.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
6. The look on Cohen's face was like wtf...why
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:17 PM
Feb 2019

Is all this going in congressional record and I can't at least read any of it??

BumRushDaShow

(128,863 posts)
7. He's probably aware of some of these articles
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:19 PM
Feb 2019

but he's really seeing how much the GOP is willing to embrace the new mob. He's probably shaking his head. Cohen is street and these guys are playing at "street" but at a higher level.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
5. I agree! That was just a show. And no objections
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:15 PM
Feb 2019

From Dems???? Why not. There were so many times Cohen wanted to say more and people just yielded . Why not ask a final question ...open ended..and let Cohen talk??? One time Cummings completely forgot that he said he could talk. Cohen just shrugged.

Some bright stars for sure but to me, many Dems were just wasting most of their time talking.

BumRushDaShow

(128,863 posts)
8. Remember there are/were other hearings
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:21 PM
Feb 2019

There is one for tomorrow (closed-door) about the meat of the stuff that is directly related to the ongoing investigation (House Intelligence). There is info that they cannot put out there in a "public" hearing.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
10. Yes, that's true. But public watching today...if we
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 07:15 PM
Feb 2019

can get 10 people to change from supporting him, it'd be worth it.

BumRushDaShow

(128,863 posts)
11. I doubt that would happen
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 07:25 PM
Feb 2019

mainly because his "base", if they are even bothering to follow the hearings, would be doing so through the propaganda filters of Faux and Hatenty, Limpballs and Coultergeist. However I think this past election (and the corresponding state elections in 2018) established that the dam is starting to burst and IMHO, I think there will probably be a chunk of his voters who will not vote for anyone at all... and the other rabid fans will still vote for him but there will be less of them overall.

That's about the best we can hope for - THEIR "non-voters" (many who were previously non-voters before 2016 anyway).

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
14. Well that's the hope for impeachment as well...
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 08:07 PM
Feb 2019

That it could all be laid out methodically and factually and that SOME supporters would actually get truth for once.

But sadly you are probably right. I taped the hearing on FOX and just started playback. Sure, Cohen was talking in a reduced screen, and they ran these constantly flipping graphics on the right part of screen. And across the bottom. It made it very difficult to concentrate on what he was saying. What an obvious ploy. Their viewers must be really stupid.

BumRushDaShow

(128,863 posts)
16. Gotta hit them from every angle
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 08:18 PM
Feb 2019

in order to hopefully have the collective bludgeoning work or at least enable one strategy to score.

I watched on CSPAN3. Don't have to deal with distracting talking heads. And believe it or not, quite a few GOP voters discovered the CSPANs about 10 - 15 years ago and learned about "jamming the lines" during the regular "Washington Journal" interview/call-in program... and during other times when there are call-ins. My mom was a CSPAN junkie and it would irk her to no end to the point where she would be yelling at the hosts to keep their "feet off the call cutoff button" for Democrats while allowing Republicans to spew their b.s.!

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
9. They are running out of material. They want to ask more,
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 06:22 PM
Feb 2019

But all the good stuff is still under investigation.

What we heard today is just the part of the iceberg you can see.

I have never held much hope in the Mueller investigation. Today changed that.

Looks like Mueller has handed off the good stuff to other branches of the Justice Department and will concentrate his report on his core mission. Finding out about Russian interference. Very smart. Cause shutting down him won’t effect those investigations.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
15. Ya, get that. But open end on anything else where
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 08:09 PM
Feb 2019

He could just talk would have been enlightening. Bet he talked 15% and committee 85%

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gee, maybe Democrats shou...