General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOmar: Influential Americans 'Push For Allegiance To A Foreign Country'
Oops, she did it again.
https://forward.com/fast-forward/420114/omar-influential-americans-push-for-allegiance-to-a-foreign-country/
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)This will not be the last time she makes a comment like this because this is what she thinks.
DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)Perhaps her defenders will be along. Perhaps we'll be told sternly not to confuse criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)how accusing AMERICANS of dual loyalty has anything to do with antiZionism.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And some in this country equate any opposition to some actions of the Israeli Government as being "proof" of being anti-semitic. And it is not.
still_one
(92,061 posts)support certain positions in regard to Israel, in this case, as having dual loyalties, and if my interpretation is correct, not only is that garbage, but ironically, using her logic, that same "dual loyalty" accusation can be directed toward her also.
Is she assuming Rubio tagged on that anti-BDS in the budget bill because he has dual loyalties? Isn't it possible that Rubio felt we shouldn't boycott our allies, which is why he added that in the bill.
If the representative is going to play the dual-loyalty card, she will rightfully get push back on that. However, if instead she took the position that it was a violation of the first amendment to require an organization not support the BDS, if they wanted to participate in government contracts, that would be a valid argument. Problem is, that is NOT what she is saying.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)So I have no issue with that.
But my sense, my personal opinion, of her statement is that she is accusing some people of being biased in favor of Israel and biased against Palestine.
still_one
(92,061 posts)dual-loyalties, "allegiance to a foreign country". She wants to play that game, then she is going to get pushback, and she deserves it.
I would oppose anyone who accused her of dual-loyalties, but the analogy she is making applies to her.
How would it sound if I said she taking her orders from Louis Farrakhan, who told her NOT to apologize
In your sense "her statement is that she is accusing some people of being biased in favor of Israel and biased against Palestine."
Then why didn't she say that?
and my sense is because she meant it.
ck4829
(35,038 posts)WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)but it is dangerous to voice that opinion. But Neti baby was indicted today and that made me feel better.
still_one
(92,061 posts)How about we should have a more balanced approach? The argument for those that put the anti-BDS in the budget bill, how about the first amendment?
I can think of a half a dozen ways to express disagreement with someone, without accusing them of dual-loyalties
This appears to be new rendition, after her apology, Does she really want to open the door again on this?
If she believes that is how she will get things done, I think she is going to be in for a difficult time.
WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)the situation with Israel. I think the anti-BDS is anti first amendment and belongs no where in our budgetary process.
still_one
(92,061 posts)jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)when a politician repeats a very old and injurious antisemitic slur?
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)The point being that between these stories about Ilhan Omar and AOC, there seems to be a concerted effort being made to take them down a peg.
DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)Instead of just an easily misinterpreted title.
The real problem here seems to be that antisemitic opinions keep slipping out of her mouth. If there is an effort to take her down a peg, she's giving the effort far too much help.
ck4829
(35,038 posts)Let's take a look at the things they say about Ilhan Omar and compare that to what Ilhan Omar says and then let's discuss.
DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)This is her saying something awful.
Behind the Aegis
(53,921 posts)It has been that way for a long time with people always find excuses for their anti-Semitism, right down to taking plays from the RW handbook of victim inversion (i.e. they are the real victim, not the group maligned) and "it's OK when our side does it because they don't really mean it to be racist/sexist/anti-Semitic/homophobic/Islamophobic/etc..
You are a star member.
DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,921 posts)But do 'search' your heart for the answers.