Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans who oppose trump's 'border emergency' fear a democratic president having the same powers
.....alá Lamar Alexander
Dear Spanone,
Thanks for getting in touch with me and letting me know whats on your mind regarding border security and President Trumps announcement of a national emergency at our Southern border on February 15, 2019.
The president has made a strong case for increased border security, but declaring a national emergency is unnecessary, unwise, and inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution. It is unnecessary because significant additional money has been approved by Congress already that he could spend on border security without declaring a national emergency. In fact, the president announced on February 15 that he would spend $3 billion of this additional funding to fund construction of the border wall. This $3 billion is in addition to the $22 billion Congress appropriated on February 14, 2019, for detention beds, technology, border patrol agents, ports of entry, replacing existing wall and 55 miles of new wall.
It is unwise because if this president can declare a national emergency to build a wall, the next president can declare a national emergency to tear it down; or declare a climate change emergency to close coal plants and build wind turbines; or a health care emergency and force into Medicare the 180 million Americans with health insurance on the job.
It is inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution because, after the American Revolution against a king, our founders chose not to create a chief executive with the power to tax the people and spend their money any way he chooses. The Constitution gives that authority exclusively to a Congress elected by the people.
I believe that Congress must continue to work with the president to secure the border in a thoughtful, cost-effective way. Ill be sure to keep your comments in mind as these issues are discussed and debated in Washington and in Tennessee.
Sincerely,
Lamar
Thanks for getting in touch with me and letting me know whats on your mind regarding border security and President Trumps announcement of a national emergency at our Southern border on February 15, 2019.
The president has made a strong case for increased border security, but declaring a national emergency is unnecessary, unwise, and inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution. It is unnecessary because significant additional money has been approved by Congress already that he could spend on border security without declaring a national emergency. In fact, the president announced on February 15 that he would spend $3 billion of this additional funding to fund construction of the border wall. This $3 billion is in addition to the $22 billion Congress appropriated on February 14, 2019, for detention beds, technology, border patrol agents, ports of entry, replacing existing wall and 55 miles of new wall.
It is unwise because if this president can declare a national emergency to build a wall, the next president can declare a national emergency to tear it down; or declare a climate change emergency to close coal plants and build wind turbines; or a health care emergency and force into Medicare the 180 million Americans with health insurance on the job.
It is inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution because, after the American Revolution against a king, our founders chose not to create a chief executive with the power to tax the people and spend their money any way he chooses. The Constitution gives that authority exclusively to a Congress elected by the people.
I believe that Congress must continue to work with the president to secure the border in a thoughtful, cost-effective way. Ill be sure to keep your comments in mind as these issues are discussed and debated in Washington and in Tennessee.
Sincerely,
Lamar
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 512 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans who oppose trump's 'border emergency' fear a democratic president having the same powers (Original Post)
spanone
Mar 2019
OP
Not that opposing it would be the right thing to do.
spanone
(135,823 posts)2. Of course not!
dsc
(52,155 posts)3. actually the fear in this case is the correct reason to oppose this
I oppose the wall because it is a bad, dumb idea, but I oppose the emergency because it gives the President virtually unlimited power which itself is a bad idea.
chowder66
(9,067 posts)4. My take is that their fear is that the dems would do something Americans would like and benefit
from. Once people like something it's hard as hell to change their minds for something less.
ffr
(22,669 posts)5. I'll be working specifically towards that aim, in case they are wondering.
Two can play at this game.
FUCK REPUBLICANS. They're nothing but stupid traitors!