Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeither Bush or Trump Could Have Won Without Fox News
Matthew Yglesias: A study by Emory University political scientist Gregory Martin and Stanford economist Ali Yurukoglu estimates that watching Fox News translates into a significantly greater willingness to vote for Republican candidates.
Specifically, by exploiting semi-random variation in Fox viewership driven by changes in the assignment of channel numbers, they find that if Fox News hadnt existed, the Republican presidential candidates share of the two-party vote would have been 3.59 points lower in 2004 and 6.34 points lower in 2008. Without Fox, in other words, the GOPs only popular vote win since the 1980s would have been reversed and the 2008 election would have been an extinction-level landslide.
And Fox is not the only thing out there. The Sinclair Broadcast Group is not a television network in a traditional sense. Instead, its a company that owns a disparate bunch of local television stations affiliated with all four major networks. But Sinclair does exert centralized control over the local television news broadcasts.
And Fox is not the only thing out there. The Sinclair Broadcast Group is not a television network in a traditional sense. Instead, its a company that owns a disparate bunch of local television stations affiliated with all four major networks. But Sinclair does exert centralized control over the local television news broadcasts.
https://web.stanford.edu/~ayurukog/cable_news.pdf
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/4/18249847/fox-news-effect-swing-elections
https://politicalwire.com/2019/03/04/neither-bush-or-trump-could-have-won-without-fox-news/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 694 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neither Bush or Trump Could Have Won Without Fox News (Original Post)
kpete
Mar 2019
OP
On one hand I have a hard time believing how many Trumpsters there are in this country
captain queeg
Mar 2019
#3
Moostache
(9,895 posts)1. Sinclair is already MUCH worse than Fox with the propaganda...
We miss the boat entirely if the focus is put only on the idiot brigade at Fox...Sinclair is a far wider and more pervasive threat than most realize.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/04/02/598794433/video-reveals-power-of-sinclair-as-local-news-anchors-recite-script-in-unison
rzemanfl
(29,556 posts)2. Your subject line. It's National Grammar Day. I wouldn't
Last edited Tue Mar 5, 2019, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)
bring it up otherwise.
captain queeg
(10,148 posts)3. On one hand I have a hard time believing how many Trumpsters there are in this country
I guess just not many in my circles. But at least 90% of TVs in public places seem to always be tuned into Fox. It grates my nerves to be trying to eat breakfast at some hotel and to have those idiots on the tube.
underpants
(182,736 posts)4. All of the media made Trump a possibility
Thats at least 1/2 of the explanation of 2016.
Blue Owl
(50,340 posts)5. That miserable fucking network of blatant, unapologetic propaganda...