Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
Mon Mar 4, 2019, 10:35 PM Mar 2019

Why don't Republicans call themselves "Republican Apartheidists"?

They all are. They advocate for racist policies. They believe in segregation. They want to live in a world of white supremacy. Many, if not most, desire to see other races eradicated.

Even if they aren't, we're going to call them that anyway.

What's the harm?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why don't Republicans call themselves "Republican Apartheidists"? (Original Post) OilemFirchen Mar 2019 OP
How about simply "racists"? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #1
Racism isn't a legislative system. OilemFirchen Mar 2019 #4
Dupe liberal N proud Mar 2019 #2
It is? OilemFirchen Mar 2019 #5
Sorry, my reply was a dupe liberal N proud Mar 2019 #8
I like it. Any way to shorten it? brush Mar 2019 #3
Aren't "Republican" and "Aparteidist" pretty much synonyms now? Freelancer Mar 2019 #6
Yes. OilemFirchen Mar 2019 #7

Freelancer

(2,107 posts)
6. Aren't "Republican" and "Aparteidist" pretty much synonyms now?
Mon Mar 4, 2019, 11:03 PM
Mar 2019

Saying "Republican Apartieidists" is like saying "Luddite antitechnologists."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why don't Republicans cal...