Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember when Greenwald called Trump an "anti-interventionist" and peace candidate? (Original Post) Blue_Tires Mar 2019 OP
Does Trump? He's the one who ran on those issues. shanny Mar 2019 #1
I know Trump changes his positions like a million times Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #2
Now people who prefer peace to empire-building and pointless endless war shanny Mar 2019 #4
Imma guess gratuitous Mar 2019 #5
I'll keep this simple Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #6
K&R betsuni Mar 2019 #3

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
2. I know Trump changes his positions like a million times
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 06:11 PM
Mar 2019

but for the record, he repeatedly said on the campaign trail that he was going to pull everyone out of our ongoing conflicts and close the unnecessary overseas bases, which made the Hillary-hating horseshoe left absolutely jizz their pants...

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
4. Now people who prefer peace to empire-building and pointless endless war
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 06:19 PM
Mar 2019

are the "Hillary-hating horseshoe {huh?} left"? What is that anyway?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. Imma guess
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 06:27 PM
Mar 2019

The ends of a horseshoe are as far apart from each other as they can be in a linear sense, but when considered as part of the shape of a horseshoe, they are really quite close (though they remain separate). Sometimes someone you are philosophically opposed to can follow their logic to its end, and wind up with a position that's awfully close to your own. They may have reached a similar conclusion to your own, but taken a very different path to get there.

It can be an interesting situation: Do you make common cause with a political enemy because you're trying to achieve the same or similar goal? Or do you mistrust the motives of a potential ally enough to keep your distance and let an injustice continue? Are you too pure or not pure enough in pursuing your goal? The current "anti-Israel is anti-semitic" kerfuffle is a good example.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
6. I'll keep this simple
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 06:58 PM
Mar 2019

1. Trump is a lying hypocrite piece of shit who was wholly unqualified to be a garbage collector, much less POTUS

2. Anyone who believed he was ever about peace and anti-intervention (or any of his wacky campaign promises) was a fucking moron

3. Any liberal with half a brain who believed this, much less actually promoted it, is an even bigger moron

4. Yes, there is a vocal faction of so-called opinion leaders on the left who hated Hillary Clinton so much that they either joined the Trump camp or they did everything possible to sabotage Hillary (For example see Greenwald, Glenn; Moore, Michael; and Sarandon, Susan among others). Folks used to complain when I called them "emoprogs" and "dudebros", so now I call them the "horseshoe left": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember when Greenwald c...