Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,839 posts)
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 09:58 PM Mar 2019

It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton

After it claimed no such document existed, the Justice Department just unearthed a letter Matt Whitaker delivered to the Utah U.S. attorney directing a review of how the department handled the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One issues.

Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote the letter on Nov. 22, 2017 for Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber. Matt Whitaker, who was Sessions’ chief of staff at the time, emailed the letter to Huber that day, writing, “As we discussed.” He also sent Huber a copy of a letter the Justice Department’s Congressional affairs chief sent to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 13 of that year.

The existence of a letter documenting Sessions’ directive that the DOJ revisit probes of Trump’s top political foe is a surprise because a department lawyer said in court last year that senior officials insisted it didn’t exist. The liberal nonprofit American Oversight obtained the letter through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request they filed on Nov. 22, 2017––the same day Whitaker emailed Sessions’ letter to Huber.

The request asked for documentation of the directions Sessions gave Huber about the review of the Clinton investigations. After DOJ failed to produce any written directions, American Oversight sued.

And on Nov. 16, 2018, Senior Counsel in the Office of Information Policy Vanessa Brinkmann, who handles FOIA Requests, said a lawyer in Sessions’ office told her no such letter existed. That lawyer spoke with Huber and Whitaker, she said in a declaration filed in federal court, and then told her that “when the Attorney General directed Mr. Huber to evaluate these matters, no written guidance or directives were issued to Mr. Huber in connection with this directive, either by the Attorney General, or by other senior leadership office staff.”

That wasn’t correct. On Wednesday of this week, a DOJ lawyer told American Oversight that they had found the document that kicked off Huber’s work.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-exists-doj-finds-letter-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton/ar-BBUzHJZ?li=BBnb7Kz

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2019 OP
Lie Lie, Deceive Deceive MagickMuffin Mar 2019 #1
Except for trying to find something on Clinton, Cold War Spook Mar 2019 #2
They knew it was nothing radical noodle Mar 2019 #3
Who was the Rethug Congressman who buried the letter? Wellstone ruled Mar 2019 #4
Sounds like probable cause for indictments on obstruction of justice and lying to cover it up. For ancianita Mar 2019 #5
So, is this the 30th year the Clintons are being investigated ? rickford66 Mar 2019 #6
Benghazi, Pizzagate, Emails, Uranium One. The GOP are experts at faux investigations. sarcasmo Mar 2019 #7
Whitewater. Monica Lewinsky. marybourg Mar 2019 #8
and health care Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #12
Depending on where and to whom the denials were issued DFW Mar 2019 #9
Malicious prosecution The Wizard Mar 2019 #10
that whole event was based on the right being able to turn molehills into mountains as certainot Mar 2019 #11
 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
2. Except for trying to find something on Clinton,
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 10:15 PM
Mar 2019

what can they possibly find on her and Uranium One? Yes, she did give her okay along with many others in the cabinet and other department heads, but it didn't mean anything. Every one of them could have said no, but Obama was the only person making the decision. After investigating her 8 time, the Republican Senate could not find anything. If they had, they would have acted on it.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
3. They knew it was nothing
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 11:45 PM
Mar 2019

but trumpsters believe it's a real thing. It would have taken some attention off the Russia investigation.

ancianita

(36,011 posts)
5. Sounds like probable cause for indictments on obstruction of justice and lying to cover it up. For
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 12:19 AM
Mar 2019

every single lawyer involved in the letter chain, perhaps even Sessions, and who might have probable deniability about who buried the letter's existence.

Lawyers have no excuse to bury the truth that's now been uncovered, therefore covered up.

Unless I'm missing something here.

rickford66

(5,522 posts)
6. So, is this the 30th year the Clintons are being investigated ?
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 12:22 AM
Mar 2019

The Trump investigations are just in the 2nd year. Ya think he could go another 28 years without going berserk ?

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,309 posts)
12. and health care
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 01:47 AM
Mar 2019

They never forgave Hillary for having the audacity to try to get health care for everyone.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_health_care_plan_of_1993

Instead of uniting behind the original proposal, many Democrats offered a number of competing plans of their own. Hillary Clinton was drafted by the Clinton Administration to head a new Task Force and sell the plan to the American people, which ultimately backfired amid the barrage from the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries and considerably diminished her own popularity.

DFW

(54,329 posts)
9. Depending on where and to whom the denials were issued
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 12:41 AM
Mar 2019

It sounds like there could be grounds for a few obstruction or even perjury charges coming. Someone obviously lied when they said no such documentation existed.

The Wizard

(12,541 posts)
10. Malicious prosecution
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 01:03 AM
Mar 2019

and Abuse of the legal system for political gain. Appointing lifetime Judges can sway and smear the political landscape. The Manifort sentencing is a prime example of politicizing the Judiciary.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
11. that whole event was based on the right being able to turn molehills into mountains as
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 01:16 AM
Mar 2019

as only rw radio can do

this whole trump disaster, from benghazi to these idiots trying to get hillary's email server, basically came out of limbaugh's ass, created in the gop and russian think tanks, feeding talk radio, and getting ignored for 30 years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It Exists: DOJ Finds Lett...