General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot just the 737: Angle-of-attack sensors have had problems
WASHINGTON In 2014, Lufthansa flight 1829 took off from Bilbao, Spain, and was ascending normally when the planes nose unexpectedly dropped. The plane an Airbus A321 with 109 passengers on board began to fall. The co-pilot tried to raise the nose with his controls. The plane pointed down even further. He tried again. Nothing, according to a report by German investigators.
As the Lufthansa plane fell from 31,000 feet, the captain pulled back on his stick as hard as he could. The nose finally responded. But he struggled to hold the plane level.
A call to a ground crew determined that the planes angle-of-attack sensors which detect whether the wings have enough lift to keep flying must have been malfunctioning, causing the Airbuss anti-stall software to force the planes nose down. The pilots turned off the problematic unit and continued the flight. Aviation authorities in Europe and the United States eventually ordered the replacement of angle-of-attack sensors on many Airbus models.
Today, aviation experts say, the angle-of-attack sensor on Boeing jets will get fresh scrutiny after two Boeing 737 MAX airplanes crashed, in Ethiopia last week and in Indonesia in October.
Crash investigators have raised concerns about the role of the sensor a device used on virtually every commercial flight in the October crash of Lion Air flight 610. There are concerns it may have sent the wrong signals to new software on the flight that automatically dips the planes nose to prevent a stall.
https://www.heraldnet.com/nation-world/not-just-the-737-angle-of-attack-sensors-have-had-problems/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=54f2e389e6-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-54f2e389e6-228635337
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)Girard442
(6,066 posts)...nice-to-have gadget to mission-critical item but wasnt redesigned to provide the necessary level of reliability. It all got swept under the rug with that oh, the pilots can override it broom.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)Boeing had too much sway in vetting it's own jets,which I found horrifying.
Written by Alan Levin and Peter Robison.
{I can't post links,or I would.)
RAB910
(3,489 posts)I am hooked on the show. It's an hour-long show that shows a crash and then the investigation that follows.
One thing I learned from the show is that there are often many leads (and they will pursue all of them to their conclusion) but most of them turn out to be dead ends.
EX500rider
(10,810 posts)Arkansas Pilot
(20 posts)Somebody should be doing a root cause analysis (5 whys) for the real reason the 737 max 8 max crashed.
1. Why did the 737 max 8 crash? - Because there was a software design error.
2. Why didnt the FAA and Boeing recognize the Software design error? - Because the FAA let Boeing self certify and Boeing rushed to complete the production to meet the market window and rationalized that the software was safe.
3. Why did the FAA allow Boeing to self certify the software? - Because the FAA was not adequately staffed and funded to support the 737 max 8 program they devised a program to allow Boeing to self certify with minimal oversight.
4. Why was the FAA not funded to support Boeings certification? - Because over the years there has been considerable pressure on all Federal Agencies to cut costs to pay for the republican tax cuts for the rich.
5. What will it take for the majority of voters to support politicians that will invest in this country and appropriately fund the FAA? - Do everything thing you can to support Democratic candidates
I know this may be simplistic but it does illustrate the point