Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 07:06 PM Mar 2019

Monmouth pollster explains USAToday/Suffolk U poll "witch hunt" question poorly designed.


?fbclid=IwAR2Yhusiaih51-6Dr4lRH4erQGm1k1wROwGA-ravAE4Yh7ao7Noq_5ve80s









Patrick Murray
@PollsterPatrick
·
Story lede is based on this poll question: "President Trump has called the Special Counsel´s investigation a “witch hunt” and said he´s been subjected to more investigations than previous presidents because of politics. Do you agree?"

Where do I start?

1. The "double-barrel" -- even SurveyMonkey warns its lay users not to do this:

2. The unbalanced response option -- we have oodles of evidence that the number of positive responses goes up with the "agree" option is presented without explicitly presenting "disagree" as a choice as well.

In fact it could be conceivably heard as a triple barreled question.
(1) Is it a witch hunt
(2) Has he been subjected to more investigations than previous presidents because of politics
and also possibly (3) has he been subjected to more investigations full stop
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Monmouth pollster explain...