General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWisconsin GOP Acted Illegally by Stripping Incoming Governor of Power, Judge Rules
Last edited Fri Mar 22, 2019, 08:14 AM - Edit history (1)
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/03/wisconsin-gop-acted-illegally-by-stripping-incoming-governor-of-power-judge-rules/The special session convened by the Republican-controlled legislature broke the law.
Republican state lawmakers in Wisconsin acted illegally in December by stripping power from the states newly elected Democratic governor before he could take office, a judge ruled Thursday.
A month after the November election, Wisconsins Republican-controlled legislature convened a lame-duck session to undercut incoming Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. They confirmed 82 executive appointees nominated by outgoing Gov. Scott Walker, many without holding a single hearing, and they blocked the new governor from making administrative changes to state laws and from following through on key campaign promises, such as withdrawing the state from a Republican-backed lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. They also limited early voting in the state, which had contributed to record turnout in 2018.
But Dane County Circuit Court judge Richard Niess ruled that the lame-duck session itself violated the law and invalidated the actions of the lame-duck legislature. Walker, Niess found, did not formally call the session, nor did the legislature pass a statute authorizing it, as required by the state constitution.The legislature did not lawfully meet, Niess ruled in response to a lawsuit filed by the Wisconsin League of women Voters. There can be no justification for enforcement of the unconstitutional legislative actions emanating from the December 2018 Extraordinary Session that is consistent with the rule of law.
..more..
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Bettie
(16,089 posts)is pretty much an arm of the Republican party these days.
ETA: However, since the case was decided on procedural issues, they might not overturn it. The asshats didn't follow their own procedures.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)the will of the voters and all that.
calimary
(81,220 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'm not current on Wisconsin's courts: Is the Supreme Court there likely to uphold the lower court decision or overturn it?
AllyCat
(16,177 posts)Could be 5-2 if the homophobic Hagadorn wins on April 2.
DFW
(54,348 posts)If the entirety of their actions after the election are voided, and that is upheld, I (and Wisconsin) would be perfectly happy with that.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)Will Evers be permitted to appoint whomever he wants now, instead of Walker picks?
Does anyone here know?
mysteryowl
(7,376 posts)Niess' ruling also struck down 82 appointments Walker made during the waning days of his administration, all of which were confirmed by Republican state Senators in the lame-duck session. Those appointments included Public Service Commissioner Ellen Nowak and University of Wisconsin Regent Scott Beightol, both of whom were confirmed in December to terms that end in 2023.
"The appointments are ordered temporarily vacated as a necessary consequence of this temporary injunction," Niess wrote.
What remains to be seen is whether Evers will act on any of these powers before the case is appealed, and whether a higher court will block him from taking action. The final say in this case would fall to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, where conservatives hold a 4-3 majority.
https://www.wpr.org/judge-blocks-gop-laws-passed-lame-duck-session
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,783 posts)Scott Walker thinks he can run for Governor again or even US Senator? It will depend how this case moves forward being that he wanted the incoming Democratic Governor to have no power whatsoever.
wryter2000
(46,037 posts)Maybe the state of Wisconsin is done with him.
The one and only thing Trump did for us, IMHO, was to deflate the presidential ambitions of Chris Christie and Scott Walker.
cstanleytech
(26,281 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)malaise
(268,930 posts)Great news
calimary
(81,220 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Traildogbob
(8,716 posts)North Carolina democrats if ya listening, grow a pair. The same was done to Gov Cooper.
lots of law suits
cp
(6,623 posts)This is great news.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)HuskyOffset
(888 posts)You may have been the victim of autocorrect, you quote the judge as saying:
There can be justification for enforcement of the unconstitutional legislative actions emanating from the December 2018 Extraordinary Session that is consistent with the rule of law.
but you're missing a word, which reverses the meaning. What the judge actually said (follow the link to the Mother Jones article) is:
There can be no justification for enforcement of the unconstitutional legislative actions emanating from the December 2018 Extraordinary Session that is consistent with the rule of law.
Thanks. Cut and paste failed to catch the no, as it was underlined. Yes that does change the meaning!
oasis
(49,376 posts)Hotler
(11,416 posts)spanone
(135,823 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)how important each and every single judicial nomination and election is. McTurtle and the Senate have been shoveling in a bunch of "wacko" judges that will be making rulings that will affect us and our children for years to come.
THIS MUST STOP!
GET OUT THE VOTE!!!!!
blue-wave
(4,352 posts)prosecute them all. They are deliberately undermining the rule of law and the stability of our country. Their disdain for America must be kept in check.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Jim_Pridx
(72 posts)This makes an extremely important Neubauer/Hagedorn race even more important on April 2nd. Go Lisa!