General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBenjamin Wittes, Lawfare: Very Quick Thoughts on the End of the Mueller Investigation
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigationThere are other possibilities as well. Its possible, for example, that Mueller is not proceeding against certain defendants other than the president because he has referred them to other prosecutorial offices; some of these referrals are already public, and its reasonable to expect there may be other referrals too. In this iteration, what is ending here is not the investigation, merely the portion of the investigation Mueller chose to retain for himself. Its possible also that Mueller is finished because he has determined that while the evidence would support a prosecution of the president, he is bound by the Justice Departments long-standing position that the president is not amenable to criminal process. On the obstruction front, he may well have concluded that, while the president acted to obstruct the investigation, he cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the presidents obstructive acts were not exercises of Trumps Article II powers. Its also possible that Mueller has strong prudential reasons for not proceeding with otherwise viable cases.
My gut instinct is that it is some combination of these factors that explains the end of the probe. Without knowing the reasons the investigation is finished, it is impossible to know how to assess its endand nobody should try.
Finally, we also know other one big thing: There is a reportsome kind of, as Barr describes it, quoting the relevant regulation, confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions he has reached. About this document we admittedly know little. Barr said in his letter that he is reviewing the document and may be in a position to advise [Congress] of the Special Counsels principal conclusions as soon as this weekend. How capacious this initial accounting will be is known only to Barr himself. But Barr has also promised to make as much of Muellers findings public as he can consistent with the lawa promise he reiterated in his letter Friday evening. So its reasonable to expect, though not to be complacent in the expectation, that over time, the underlying factual findings and legal analysis will emerge.
All of which, as I say, shifts the conversation from what Mueller will do to what he has written in explaining what he has doneand what he has not done. Vindication for the president will take place only when we learn that the facts contained in the report exculpate him. The end of the Mueller probe could well prove tomorrow to be merely the creation of a factual record for the next act of this drama.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)How dare he!
Clearly Trump has fully escape the brunt of the law and we all are doomed!
AJT
(5,240 posts)This is a grave disappointment.
Qutzupalotl
(14,289 posts)That case is ongoing. Materials were organized by Mueller and handed off to SDNY. Weisselberg has testified before the grand jury. Stuff is happening that (IMO) will indict all principals in the Trump Organization.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)So I don't think this is wishful thinking.
Nonetheless, Trump will be claiming victory any minute now. So let's hope one of the other prosecutors indict someone Monday.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...Watergate took off when Dean testified before Congress.
It was after the FBI concluded their investigation, burglars were already in court.
Didn't want to rely on the political arena at this stage, but we're really not going to get a shortcut to doing what our Constitution provides for, in voting, and in Congress providing the necessary check on the Executive.