Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1087 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sealed indictments or not? (Original Post)
triron
Mar 2019
OP
greyl
(22,990 posts)1. For all intents and purposes, sealed. nt
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)2. DOJ says there are none. nt
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)3. Originally it appeared possible, but several reporters are now saying unequivocally no
So I'd say it's looking more and more like Mueller punted whatever he had to Congress and went home.
dweller
(23,625 posts)4. yeh and threads here saying
the press have the report already, etc...
but not Congress?
patience, still a virtue..
✌🏼️
Socal31
(2,484 posts)5. No, and nobody credible has suggested it.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)6. Sealed indictments
Are not things any justice Department official would confirm or deny. Jeepers
Socal31
(2,484 posts)7. I'm going to take the officials' work for it when they say no more.