Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would you vote for a candidate that didn't have a twitter account? (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Mar 2019 OP
That would make me *want* to vote for them. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2019 #1
YES exboyfil Mar 2019 #5
+1 rampartc Mar 2019 #6
Ditto. Tipperary Mar 2019 #12
Me too. nt. Dem2theMax Mar 2019 #21
It would be a positive attribute in by book. Socal31 Mar 2019 #2
Not YES but Hell YES!! I'm tired of the daily BS and meaningless crap on twitter. Juvenile. walkingman Mar 2019 #3
I would prefer a candidate w/o a Twitter account. Too much BS Raven123 Mar 2019 #4
Yes. GemDigger Mar 2019 #7
Absolutely! Do you know one???? nt LAS14 Mar 2019 #8
Only if I ageed with their political values. Ms. Toad Mar 2019 #9
Well NOW you've gone and done it lol...now we gotta deal with THAT litmus test for 2020.. Volaris Mar 2019 #40
Yup. Ms. Toad Mar 2019 #41
Lol at least we'll know which ones are 'checking in' with us? Volaris Mar 2019 #43
I'd PREFER a candidate that doesn't have a twitter account. Totally Tunsie Mar 2019 #10
Absolutely DFW Mar 2019 #11
People I know fall into three categories. Igel Mar 2019 #13
Yes, please! TomSlick Mar 2019 #14
maybe, but most candidates just use it as a place to post info JI7 Mar 2019 #15
Sure, although there are people out there using it for better purposes than Trump... Wounded Bear Mar 2019 #16
Yes. GoCubsGo Mar 2019 #17
Absolutely. sinkingfeeling Mar 2019 #18
I would, BUT any elected major US politician that doesn't have one is fighting Celerity Mar 2019 #19
I know that. Iggo Mar 2019 #35
I would consider that a plus, yes Maeve Mar 2019 #20
Yes, that is a positive for me. northoftheborder Mar 2019 #22
yes. & no facebook? YES! pansypoo53219 Mar 2019 #23
In a heartbeat. Twitter is a plague on the body politic. nt Hekate Mar 2019 #24
You're kidding, right? Nitram Mar 2019 #25
Yes kimbutgar Mar 2019 #26
What's a Twitter? WheelWalker Mar 2019 #27
Its a plus. I don't think professionals should communicate professionally via Twitter. aikoaiko Mar 2019 #28
That's Good Reasoning ProfessorGAC Mar 2019 #44
I helped to invent the internet... 43 years ago lapfog_1 Mar 2019 #29
I wouldn't even know that they didn't unless someone made an issue of it. nt tblue37 Mar 2019 #30
Yes...nt 2naSalit Mar 2019 #31
Don't use twitter so really don't care if they use it or not. Quixote1818 Mar 2019 #32
Yes. wendyb-NC Mar 2019 #33
Yes. Iggo Mar 2019 #34
I don't give a flying fuck about twitter accounts. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #36
Sure Luciferous Mar 2019 #37
Yes.... Tikki Mar 2019 #38
It's not even in the top 20 things that are important to me... VarryOn Mar 2019 #39
Proudlib doesn't have a Twitter account ProudLib72 Mar 2019 #42
You Can't Run ProfessorGAC Mar 2019 #45
As others have said, it is a marketing tool ... cbdo2007 Mar 2019 #46
No. They have to know how to use the technology. treestar Mar 2019 #47

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
2. It would be a positive attribute in by book.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 05:57 PM
Mar 2019

Reaching voting age in the early 00s, I've done so multiple times.

Ms. Toad

(33,997 posts)
9. Only if I ageed with their political values.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:17 PM
Mar 2019

Would you vote for one that didn't have a parakeet? (That seems about as relevant a voting criteria to me . . .)

Ms. Toad

(33,997 posts)
41. Yup.
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 12:59 AM
Mar 2019

Now I just have to find out which candidate has a parakeet, so I know which one to vote for.

Volaris

(10,266 posts)
43. Lol at least we'll know which ones are 'checking in' with us?
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:18 AM
Mar 2019

I suppose thatd be marginally a good thing lol...

DFW

(54,295 posts)
11. Absolutely
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:36 PM
Mar 2019

I have an account, but I use it so infrequently, I have to look up my password each time, and I have no idea how the features work.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
13. People I know fall into three categories.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:48 PM
Mar 2019

Those without Twitter. They're normal.

Those who have an account but seldom use it except when there's something they want twits to see. (Or is that "tweeters"? No matter.)

Those who use it constantly, and confuse Twitter-realm with the world. If it's on Twitter, it's important; if you're on Twitter, you're important. What's on Twitter must be right. Twitter assumes outsized importance for people who are constant users, much like Instagram does for a lot of teens. Twitter has something like 17 million active users (Twitter likes to say that a truly impressive percentage of people have accounts and are "users"; I have an active account and checked it last perhaps a month ago. I'm not alone.

My school district sends out alerts by Twitter. And is repeatedly slammed by parents for not communicating with them. "But everybody uses Twitter!" No, the school district has a "social media" person because the top administration uses it and requires that the rest of the administration uses it. At trainings teachers are told they *will* sign up for it, and we're walked through the process. Then most of us ignore it for the rest of the year, to a refrain of, "Why don't you know this? You have a Twitter feed, don't you?"

I'd prefer that they confiscate my elected official's cell phones upon swearing it and give them pagers instead, returning their cell phones as their replacements are sworn in. It would reduce the level of sycophancy for low-ranking ones, narcissism overall, and reduce sharply the ease with which politicians make themselves into utter asses and easily breach both protocol and security.

JI7

(89,240 posts)
15. maybe, but most candidates just use it as a place to post info
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:51 PM
Mar 2019

on where they will be or their position on some current issue.

most don't really use it to debate.

Wounded Bear

(58,601 posts)
16. Sure, although there are people out there using it for better purposes than Trump...
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:55 PM
Mar 2019

It is not the platform or the technology that is inherently evil, it is the users.

Just like I won't vow to NOT vote with someone that uses twitter. How they use it is what matters.

Celerity

(43,108 posts)
19. I would, BUT any elected major US politician that doesn't have one is fighting
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:24 PM
Mar 2019

with one hand tied behind their backs.

AOC is the perfect example. She immediately smacks down bullshit and fake new hit attacks with real-time, massively effective clap backs. She wins the media wars far more times than not.

ProfessorGAC

(64,854 posts)
44. That's Good Reasoning
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 07:45 AM
Mar 2019

Only problem is we have people actually believing that a pol taking to Twitter is talking directly to them and "telling it like it is". Both, of course, are illusory.

lapfog_1

(29,192 posts)
29. I helped to invent the internet... 43 years ago
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:07 PM
Mar 2019

don't get me wrong... The Arpanet was a few years old when I, as a college student, was part of a team that wrote some of the original IMP (Internet Message Protocol) code (before there was TCP/IP).

I have a Twitter account, a Facebook account, Instagram, and, yes, even a Myspace account (and yahoo and google).

except for gmail... and google maps... I religiously do NOT USE any of them.

The saying used to be "religion is the opiate of the people"... I say "social media is the opiate of the people... often the wrong people"

None of the social media has brought us together... more often it helps to divide us.

I want my next President, whoever they may be, to never use social media again as long as they are President.

Quixote1818

(28,918 posts)
32. Don't use twitter so really don't care if they use it or not.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:24 PM
Mar 2019

and the fact that dick head uses it all the time makes me long for someone completely opposite of him.

Iggo

(47,534 posts)
34. Yes.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:58 PM
Mar 2019

That's not why I'd vote for them.

But yes, I have no problem voting for a candidate who doesn't have a twitter account.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
36. I don't give a flying fuck about twitter accounts.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:27 PM
Mar 2019

I don't have one. I doubt I'll ever have one. It's fine that lots of other people have them.

For what it's worth, I think my son has one, but some years back he more or less told me I was forbidden to get on twitter and find his account.

And honestly, even without his prohibition, I don't feel at all deprived not being on twitter. What I need to see from that particular aspect of social media I get all over the place.

What was the question?

 

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)
39. It's not even in the top 20 things that are important to me...
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:45 PM
Mar 2019

But I cant imagine there would be a candidate without a Twitter account.

I dont have a Facebook account anymore, but I do have a Twitter one. I dont post, and I dont subscribe to many people.

A politician can use Twitter effectively to reach out to voters. I do like that a politician can communicate directly to his/her followers without going through the media.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
42. Proudlib doesn't have a Twitter account
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 01:04 AM
Mar 2019

Everyone should vote for Proudlib 2020

This message endorsed by Proudlib and the Coalition for Proudlib

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
46. As others have said, it is a marketing tool ...
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 07:52 AM
Mar 2019

And if used correctly by company's marketing department it can be very valuable.

That being said though, most company executives that I know never Twitter and would never use it for actual executive communication.

In 10 years people aren't going to be using it at all because there will be something new anyways.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
47. No. They have to know how to use the technology.
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 07:56 AM
Mar 2019

Use it wisely. It is possible. But they'd be out of the loop.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you vote for a cand...