General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPaul Ryan did not just say this!!!
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/24/ryan-on-abortion-exceptions-rape-is-just-another-method-of-conception/I cannot believe that the GOP nominee for vice-president just endorsed a criminal act!!! Do you have to have a lobotomy to run on the tea party, far right, GOP ticket? If he is not booted from the ticket for this, then it's open season on women. What has this country come to when such disgusting, immoral people are the leaders of a major political party? Unbelievable!!!
madaboutharry
(40,207 posts)Fla Dem
(23,650 posts)I actually do not find him at all attractive or good looking. He got kind of a goofy, hang dog face, like silly putty. However, not one to judge a person by their looks, I do judge him by his thoughts and deeds. He's just an ugly person.
Mr. 'Rape is just another method of conception
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)With his small brain in the wrong head.
Mister Ed
(5,928 posts)See, rape is just another method of conception. Except it's not a very good method, because everyone knows you can't get pregnant from being raped. At least, not from being legitimately raped. But if you do get pregnant from being legitimately raped, they'll make you have the baby, and then call the baby illegitimate.
Oh dear god. Now my head hurts.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I instantly thought of him when I read it. Love it!
gordianot
(15,237 posts)Just too bad the underlying principle Mr. Akin uses is not supported by fact but that at least shows there could be a logical outcome. A Republican could never think of that on his/her own process. Watch out some Republican could read this satire and borrow satire for a program the same way they embraced "self deportation".
freshwest
(53,661 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)how can any woman in the country vote for these "people"?
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Seems a perfect description built right into their name.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)MsPithy
(809 posts)I'm going to use it, too! Let's make them sorry they ever uttered "Democrat Party."
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)had a dog
Cleita
(75,480 posts)it's really a super dumb thing to say!
MissNostalgia
(159 posts)He said this and it was filmed, the lazy national TV fake news media has no excuse to not pick this up. If he said this to a newspaper or another written editorial that one would have to read, it would be as if he never said it, because reading and investigating stuff is hard for some people.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Yes, the dumb is excruciating all the way around.
malaise
(268,919 posts)Rape is just another method of conception
Rape is a crime.
Wednesdays
(17,342 posts)It's not a crime if she doesn't resist vigorously enough.
malaise
(268,919 posts)seriously!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Probably because it makes men's actual participation, violent or otherwise, unnecessary.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But where exactly did he endorse a criminal act?
His views are without a doubt extreme, but at least he's consistent, i.e., in his mind, life is life, regardless of how it was conceived. Unlike the so-called "pro-lifers" that are only against abortion if a woman consents to sex and becomes pregnant, i.e., slut-shaming.
demwing
(16,916 posts)OK, maybe "endorsing" is a poor word choice. Would "condoning" be closer? Not yet? ok, how about "minimizing the criminality of..." - yeah, that works.
"Paul Ryan is minimizing the criminality of a brutal, violent felony."
Well I, for one, am damn glad we got that straightened out, I feel much better about that greasy headed douche nozzle.
Much appreciated.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I expect Republicans to lie and mislead with their words, but I expect better of Democrats. What he said was bad enough without exaggerating it beyond what he said.
demwing
(16,916 posts)surely not nearly enough to merit chastisement. It's an emotional subject, he's a rancid dick, and he deserves EVERY negative response he's received so far in THIS thread.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:28 PM - Edit history (2)
who were attacking Ryan.
Shame on you...
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But as I'm 100% pro-choice, I support your right to believe whatever you choose.
demwing
(16,916 posts)That's a chastisement. You can have your own opinions, but not your own facts.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)You can have your own opinions, but not your own facts. And the fact is that nowhere in the article did Ryan endorse rape.
If you choose to believe that I chastised the OP, have at it. You are welcome to your own opinions as well.
demwing
(16,916 posts)it's not happening here.
ann---
(1,933 posts)and the victim should not have to PAY for the crime by having a criminal's baby that she DIDN'T ASK FOR.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)FatIrishBastard
(51 posts)Just....................don't, not here.
tonybgood
(218 posts)In the context of the phrase, rape is just another form of conception in the same way as taking a vitamin pill is just another form of nutrition. I don't see that as an exaggeration at all. In fact, because there is no disclaimer about rape being immoral, illegal, or in any way an "improper" form of conception, he is indeed "endorsing" rape as an acceptable form of conception.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)And saying that isn't a "defense" of Ryan.
demwing
(16,916 posts)and experiences that even the least exciting of us will collect in a single day are too expansive to fit into your trim "either/or" portrayal of the world.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's a good way to lose a debate.
demwing
(16,916 posts)just ask Mike Dukakis.
demwing
(16,916 posts)"Bernard, that's a shameful question, try again." And then refused to answer.
or
"Bernard, are you asking me as a father and husband, or as a President? Because as a father and husband, my response would be much like yours, or any man's, and in my personal suffering would live a desire to see such a man die (...pause...) However, as the President, I would be charged with putting my own suffering to the side, and doing what is best for my country. America deserves a President that knows the difference between revenge and justice, and there is no justice in capital punishment."
That answer would have rocked the debate, maybe changed Dukakis' future.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Because now Ryan can paint his opponents as liars, saying he never said that.
Better to deal head-on with the issue. It's up to the woman's choice, rape or not. Rather than misrepresenting what he said and allowing him to play the victim.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Showing emotion gives you humanity. Sometimes you must address the emotional impact of an event with a little emotion of your own.
Off handedly dismissing a comment and a very applicable example isn't a strength, it's a weakness. Politics is more than pure theoretical debate on dry issues, it's often emotionally charged, and requires a range of communication skills that extend beyond the purely intellectual.
Show of emotion is something Republicans do well. That doesn't make such displays bad, it makes Republicans more effective. Being right on the issues is something Democrats do well, but we don't have to choose between the two, we can be right, and still be angry, happy, excited, thoughtful, empatheic, warm, and fiery. If we did, we'd win more often.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Showing some emotion or passion is a different thing than letting emotions carry you into exaggeration. Passionately defending a woman's right to decide on termination of pregnancy, regardless of "method" of conception is a good response. Responding to Lyan by saying he's condoning rape just lets him go off into victim territory as misrepresented and so now we are talking about whether poor Lyan is being misrepresented and saying nothing about a woman's right to bodily integrity.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Politics is played on an emotional battlefield. Rape is a emotionally charged issue. If Paul Ryan does not want to open himself to emotional responses, exaggerated or not, then he should stay the hell off the playground. I don't have to agree with every response in this thread to be able to say that Ryan deserves every response, exaggerated or not.
Ryan poked a tiger in the nose. If he comes back crying that it was unfair to have gotten his finger or hand bitten off in the process, that doing so was irrational of the tiger, well too fucking bad for him. If this threatens to change the conversation from "bad Ryan" to "bad Tiger," there are ways to counter that (such as pointing out that even if it were wrong or inaccurate, it was avoidable by just keeping your finger out of the tiger's face!), or to use the debate in order to controll the conversation.
Do you think Paul Ryan wants to spend the rest of the election debating whether people over-reacted to his stupid comments? How does that allow him to stay on message? How can he talk about the economy when he's defending himeself against accusations that he supports rape?
I'd love to have Ryan stuck on this topic, it works for us, not against us.
Thanks to DUer hifiguy for this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002579626
i found no exaggeration...anyryan saying something improper such as "rape is just another form of conception" can elicit a wide range of outrage and all within bounds with an over the top comment that has no sympathy, empathy or even saying something simple like rape is a reprehensible act of a coward. I found no exaggeration or inappropriate emotion in any response concerning aynryans stupid remark.
treestar
(82,383 posts)though a fair characterization.
I do like "aynryan" though!
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Tacit acceptance is permission.
What he said is despicable. And yes, it is open season on women.
I've had enough of this nonsense. 9 years ago I was driven out of my home by a registered sex offender and his gang of thugs. I lost my career and my retirement savings. After 3 years of incredibly hard work in a brutally difficult allied health care program, I started a new job and within 4 months found myself the target of sexual harassment by a couple tea party co-workers and their friend; a brain-damaged, divorced, alcholic janitor whose own son will have nothing to do with him and who "has a hard time accepting no" and harassed his last target until she married somebody else.
I've fucking had it with the attitude of the right wing tea party nutcase assholes. My next major purchase will be a gun, along with license to carry concealed.
You fucking assholes want to fuck me so bad? Prepare to have your fucking nuts blown off.
CabCurious
(954 posts)and no, i dont agree with what he actually said, either.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)What is your agenda here?
CabCurious
(954 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts).. on a Democratic website what their agenda is, is "flaming," then so be it.
What is your agenda here?
CabCurious
(954 posts)I criticized Assange... and now you stalk me with this nonsense.
One more time and I report you. Feel free to have a jury review MY posts... while they check YOURS
treestar
(82,383 posts)And they said it could not be done! Good job!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)to say and feel what you want on any subject here. There ARE a lot of different agendas on this sight. If you feel you are right, stick with it, ignore the attacks based on personal agendas or egos
CabCurious
(954 posts)Doesn't exactly lend itself to inviting intelligent, honest input from mature people.
treestar
(82,383 posts)He didn't say the rape should not be punished under the criminal law. But then he doesn't get into that, at least in that exchange. Maybe someone should ask him that.
He may not believe Akin's nonsense, and therefore accept that a woman might truly be pregnant as result of a rape. Then the rapist ought to go to jail and the woman should have the baby, is his opinion. Doesn't mean we can't condemn that opinion as is.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)has more rights than a living woman. What part of this do you not understand.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)The crime of rape is beside the point to Ryan. Ryan disagrees with the law that says women have a right to choose to have abortions. Ryan wants to change that law, take away the right of the woman to decide what is best for her, and give more rights to the rapist and the zygote than to the woman.
CabCurious
(954 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I certainly didn't - I think his comments are disgusting, but disgusting doesn't equal endorsing a crime.
JohnnyRingo
(18,624 posts)It's the oldest political trick in the book to wait until an opponent says something potentially damaging then hold up a megaphone in front of their mouth.
These days the internet and social media makes this much easier to do, and Democrats have mastered the new tecnology thanks in large part to Howard Dean, who's supporters pioneered use of the network. While Democrats now have the internet figured out, the relatively lower tech Republicans have the art of the email hoax down pat.
From "Obama didn't salute" to the birther theory, I've seen them all in my inbox. Dems don't seem to do that, prefering actual web sites to get their message through. That's why Romney doesn't actually post on his own Facebook page. He has a younger aide do it.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)ryan was asked:
'Specifically where you stand when it comes to rape, and when it comes to the issue of should it be legal for a woman to be able to get an abortion if shes raped? WJHL reporter Josh Smith wondered.
He replied "Im very proud of my pro-life record, and Ive always adopted the idea that, the position that the method of conception doesnt change the definition of life, Ryan explained.'
You think there is no exaggeration in that adopted idea...the position. He even says he is PROUD of his record because of his adopted idea/position and rape in NOT an exception. There is no reason to exaggerate anything, unless a person is in agreement w/ his exaggerated idea/position.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Saying that Ryan condoned a criminal act, i.e., rape, is an exaggeration.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)no
CabCurious
(954 posts)What he said is bad enough as it is.
demwing
(16,916 posts)It's vile, sub-human, and incredible stupid, politically.
That man cannot be that stupid.
Therefore, he must be more vile than we first believed of him (which, honestly, is hard to imagine).
Being that vile, Paul Ryan deserves whatever condemnation he receives, even if it offends you. Sorry, I'm not deaf to your point, just otherwise motivated.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)in other words, wake me up when they stop their radical views.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Ineeda
(3,626 posts)(Off topic, but did you notice that you were response #11, and that it was your 11,111th post? Cool.)
glinda
(14,807 posts)progressoid
(49,978 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Share the HELL out of this...
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)but the quote in the text doesn't. He's talking about the fetus, not the act or the victim. He says the fetus is still a life.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)He's saying it doesn't matter what the form of conception is, women should be forced, by federal law, to carry the results to term.
This is coming from a guy who, if he's at all like most Republicans, feels that taxation is "violence" because it's mandated by law. "Demanding my money at the point of a gun!"
Fuck Ryan, and fuck the DU'ers who want to nuzzle up between his cheeks like a calf looking for a teat.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)was more quick & efficient in some cases. This being one. This sorry excuse for a human sitting stupidly on his stool needs to spend the next 15 years in CELL C.
Only, and only then will he get the message of what seriously depraved men are like.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I hate to say it but that is the teaching in some (by no means all) quarters of the Catholic Church. Women are evil and sinful, something to shun. And they certainly can't make decisions for themselves about their bodies.
He completely disregards women, mothers, and focuses on the fetus. It's just a completely male chauvinist view of the world.
spanone
(135,819 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)"Rape is one way a woman might become pregnant."
"Rape is one method by which a woman might become pregnant."
"If a woman is raped, she may become pregnant."
I think we're going crazy with this. No fair minded person is going to take what he said as an endorsement of the act of rape.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)It is one of many ways a woman may become pregnant.
He is not endorsing rape. Saying that he is, is the sort of thing they do. We need to get a grip here.
Trying to say that rape varies in degree as they did with the "forcible" shit is fair game.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I agree he wasn't promoting the idea of rape in order to make more fetuses he could then fight for. That is not the issue.
The issue is that rape is a horrible, violent crime that scars its victims for life. He has shown absolutely no human compassion for that. And his statement "just another form of conception" essentially dismisses the horrendous nature of this crime, just as if he would have said, "Oh well, shit happens, but I'm a pro-lifer."
That is the issue.
I will never understand the twisted mind of a person who could put a rape victim through at least another 9 months of hell -- and maybe an entire lifetime if the victim feels strongly that she must raise the child -- for the sake of a zygote that is at minimum 8 months away from being what any reasonable observer could call a "person" or an "independent life".
Terminating a zygote -- a few cells smaller that the head of a pin -- versus putting a victim of a horrible crime through 9 months of emotional hell? What kind of a sick mind sees any equity there?
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)But it is not just another way a woman may become pregnant.
It is also a horrible act of violence.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)tonybgood
(218 posts)He didn't disavow rape. He didn't say it was a heinous crime. He didn't even say he was personally opposed to rape. He said it was just "another method of conception". I'd say declaring it just another way of doing something is, in fact an "endorsement".
CabCurious
(954 posts)If we try to twist his words into some kind of defense of rape, then we're being as guilty as them when they completely twist Obama's words to mean something it clear does not.
Yes, we disagree with Ryan's position that it rape doesn't matter in terms of abortion.
tonybgood
(218 posts)It is not just about abortion, it's about a criminal act. To declare that a criminal act is irrelevant to what can be done afterwords, just doesn't make sense. He is, in fact, saying that if you are raped, that the woman must accept the consequences of a crime in which she is the victim and, furthermore; she must accept that she has no choice in the matter. Are you saying you don't see that as a tacit endorsement for any man to just grab any woman? Do you not see this for what it is; a "caveman" method of procreation? It isn't that we disagree with Mr. Ryan on abortion, it's that we disagree on what he considers "acceptable" behavior.
treestar
(82,383 posts)But he didn't reveal it in that conversation. He may still think the rapist goes to jail in this scenario.
There are women out there who would think the same thing and claim they would bear the rapist's child (I've heard actual right wing women say this). Maybe they are deluding themselves, because they have never been raped. Some people will go to any lengths regarding "God's will."
That's the number of rape victims who become pregnant and decide to give birth. I'm not sure that all of them raise the child themselves, but that's the number 2 studies done on this matter have come up with.
treestar
(82,383 posts)http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/24/ryan-on-abortion-exceptions-rape-is-just-another-method-of-conception/
So it is a fair deduction that he is calling rape just another "method of conception" but not an exact quote.
ETA: typical republican crap that the Veep is a nobody. If something happens to RMoney, then he'll be making the policy. That's the reason for this position. (I ran into this right wing crap when asking birthers why they did not need to see Biden's long form birth certificate and they made the excuse he was only running for Veep - well the point of having a Veep is so he can step in and so he/she should be qualified for the job. God they are such racist bastards.)
neverforget
(9,436 posts)the possible fertilized egg. That is a sickening position.
Iris
(15,652 posts)When someone can so callously let something like this loose, it says a lot about what they think of women.
tanyev
(42,550 posts)Loudly
(2,436 posts)Strangely, that Sanctity of Human Life Act H.R. 212, which is very short in its wording, expressly protects clones!
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)They're c-c-crazy!!!!
Chemisse
(30,809 posts)He just didn't feel it changed the situation. He is a purist, it seems. At least he is willing to stand up there and show what an asshole he is, unlike Romney.
Romney may be experiencing a bit of buyer's remorse. He's probably having Ryan fitted for a muzzle by now.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Rape is not "just another form of conception". Its a most violent, degrading, and invasive act against women. The fact that rape is the same as consensual procreation to Paul Ryan is MOST disgusting and speaks volumes about him as a person.
Cha
(297,137 posts)of conception..mfingdumbshit.
CabCurious
(954 posts)Chemisse
(30,809 posts)There is no need to add drama to his words; they are plenty damaging on their own.
Just keep talking, Ryan!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)& thats exactly what I did.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)tonybgood
(218 posts)CabCurious:
I've gone back and read all the posts up to hear. I understand your point but question your reasoning. Winning an argument is not the point. My point in using the word "endorsing" was an honest effort on my part to convey not just what Mr. Ryan said, but the way he said it and his body language while he was saying it. Rape, to him, is an occurrence that causes conception; which is all that he is concerned. The creation of life, no matter the circumstances, is this man's sole consideration. He sees any fertilized egg by any process in which it occurs as inviolate. That, in my humble opinion, does indeed mean that he endorses any method which creates a fertilized egg in a woman. Only one person's consent is required because Mr. Ryan does not believe that women have the capacity to make decisions for themselves. That makes rape just another form of conception of which he makes no distinction. Hence an endorsement.
If you wish to question my semantics, you are entitled and welcome to do so. Questioning my sincerity and honesty, however; I do take exception. I didn't write this post in an attempt to win an argument but to demonstrate the point of view of Paul Ryan and those whose thoughts are similar to him. If that doesn't meet your standards of "sincerity" and "honesty"; perhaps we have different ideas about what those words mean.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)the rapist can be granted visitation rights as the biological father.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)I mean, beyond the fact the the rape victim has to deal with her rapist for 18 yrs, is the fact that selling pot in college can keep you from adopting a kid. Rape a woman and you make a great dad.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Cha
(297,137 posts)photo is supplied to emphasize..
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)that for this brand of Christians, "life" is limited to that period of time from conception to birth. They don't acknowledge life after birth. For that matter they aren't too concerned about ensuring the mother and the fetus both receive appropriate pre-natal care, nutrition, safety, etc. They are just concerned that the "bun in the oven" stays in the oven until it is ready.
From birth they totally disavow any responsibility or interest in the child from ensuring the child has a safe and loving home, appropriate healthcare, nutrition, love, etc. They could care less if the child gets an appropriate education or has opportunity for a future.
Chemisse
(30,809 posts)(or at least look sort of like someone who maybe committed a crime) they will be happy to snuff out that "precious" life.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)robinlynne
(15,481 posts)Freddie
(9,259 posts)Than "no exceptions for rape"; even all but the most radical hard-line pro-lifers. Because what Paul Ryan is saying is this: you are worth less than the diseased jizm (sorry) of a rapist. No other interpretation.
This is why far more many women than men hated Sarah Palin.
We have to scream this story from the rooftops.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Ryan says that abortion is taking a life. If that's what he believes, how can he turn his back on lives just to support Mitt Romney?
bluemarkers
(536 posts)They put their daughters on the private jet, fly to a private clinic somewhere, and have their appendix removed.
Women have no value in the gop platform.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts).. I was told by women on this forum that because I don't have a vagina, I'm not allowed to comment on this topic.
Wednesdays
(17,342 posts)I'm male and I don't have any problems posting here.
On edit: here's a suggestion. Have your wife (or girlfriend or sister) type your response for you. I eagerly await what you have to say.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)They said under no uncertain terms that they do not want men's support.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...you have my permission to get past your bitterness at what some other women here said and speak your mind.
And i'll add, that if you bring this up again, using it to point like a little kid at those mean bullies and what they said in that other thread, I'll rescind that permission. Because I get as sick and tired of people re-hashing "trauma" like this ("the gay people say I have to be hetero to talk! The black people say I have to be black to talk! The men say I have to be male! The women say I have to be female!"...Blah, blah, blah! Since when does any human being have to be anything other than human to discuss human nature? :eyes as I get sick and tired with those who, thanks to their emotional issues, create such ridiculous drama.
Forgive them, forget them, and get on with your life.
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. sorry to have mistaken your gender. Perhaps a word or two from you to your more radical sisters wouldn't hurt. Those are who my (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) point was intended for. I've always advocated for gender equality and always will. Strong, competent women have been in my life since birth. What bugs me about the man bashing variety, is not so much what they say, I've got a pretty thick skin, it's more about the damage they do to the very causes they claim to promote.
I hope that better explains me. Thanks for your thoughts.
Peace out.
ananda
(28,858 posts)Concede: rape can be a method of conception in the biological sense.
But: it is never JUST ANOTHER method of conception. It's a horrible
brutal crime and should never be thought of as just another anything
except a horrible brutal crime.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Get these fucking guys out of my body.
bluesbassman
(19,370 posts)I hope the Obama team ties that quote around Ryan's neck like a millstone.
emilyg
(22,742 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)....another kind of father".
Deserving of all the parental rights a parent has?
Rapists have more rights than loving gay parents in right wing world.
Disgusting, immoral, primitive.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)views."
I've said that over and over. The problem with Akin for republicans isn't what he said, but that he said it.
Wednesdays
(17,342 posts)It's because he said it, and was denounced that he said it.
ann---
(1,933 posts)that way if his wife or daughter is ever impregnated by a rapist. what an absurd human being. He looks so silly in that photo and he's supposed to be the SMART one? Yikes. I hate republicans more every day.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Now everything is starting to make sense
What a Dick this guy is
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What a fucker.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I say, one of the big donors pay for a shit-load of Obama adds carrying this message.
Cha
(297,137 posts)when I posted it too. Asswipe is written all over his face.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)And absolutely enraging.
Both Romney and Ryan are making my hands itch - just want to slug them both with a rock.
polly7
(20,582 posts)If he had an inkling of the pain, terror, shame, humiliation and the ptsd, the nightmares that sometimes never go away - he wouldn't talk about rape like it was some kind of date gone a little wrong, let alone mention the poor unwanted child or the traumatized, unprepared, devastated woman / girl. I'm not saying what I mean here very well, but jesus, they talk about rape like they're discussing a cup of coffee. WTH is wrong with these people?
MissNostalgia
(159 posts)I want to scream, but I cant.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)That's the message that needs to be conveyed to people who parrot this guy when he says his views don't matter since the President makes policy. Ryan will be a heartbeat away from making his own policy and nominating his own Supreme Court justices to ensure rape victims are forced to carry their rapist's babies to term.
PatSeg
(47,397 posts)but the headline of the story was also misleading.
Im very proud of my pro-life record, and Ive always adopted the idea that, the position that the method of conception doesnt change the definition of life.
That was really dumb and certainly inflammatory but it wasn't "rape is just another method of conception". Cheesy headline. The story would have been powerful enough without such wording.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I think it's very intellectual in his head. He's making categories and not really thinking of the experience if it happened to an actual woman he knows.
Though some are so religious, they could be able to handle it because they think it is God's Will and they get comfort out of their religious beliefs.
But just talking about it in the abstract, and as a man, it is cruel and insensitive in not really identifying with the girl or woman who may be pregnant after a rape.
PatSeg
(47,397 posts)and someone made that point as well. When Paul Ryan talks about conception and abortion, he avoids mentioning "woman" as if it is merely a concept and doesn't involve a real real human being. Republicans have a tendency to do this, leave women out of a discussion which involves them, their bodies, and their mental and physical health.
It is so demeaning. My generation put up with this kind of thinking for so long, but I thought we had moved forward. Now republicans want to pull us back to those dark days. Did they really think we wouldn't react? Not only are they insensitive, they are totally clueless.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)and Huckabeanasshole's remark..
That explains it all. Thank you God for rape!
( my sarcasm to the extreme!!!)
I am really beginning to hate these people.
Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)They do not want Tax dollars going toward abortions.
If they lower the operating costs of government then they have a better position to keep their tax cuts.
Ryan is addressing the donors here to the RNC in effect pandering for contributions.
In their Bizarro world a woman is just a vaginal life support system because that is all that they want from them,every thing else can be done better by a private contractor.
I wager this,in the near future a corporation will rise which will specialize in abortion for minorities and the wingers will laud it for it's compassionate corporate morals for unburdening society from the moocher class which they feel is threatening the white christian world's existence.
This is their strawman argument which holds no water in any way shape or form,but is effective to those low info voter's.
Mr Ryan here has already started manipulating the laws regarding rape,now the 1% has him to sell their plan to the people.
After writing this i need an antacid and i'm off to brush my teeth,Yuck!
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)Christian conquerors would rape 'breeders' in their most recent wins in order to spread their seed
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)'Christian conquerors' as the tale it tells ends with the death and imprisonment of the original followers. The crusader times are not recorded in the Bible...
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)No one said this group of republicans could speak English in any form of understandable.
Rape is a crime of power and intimidation not a crime of sex, and I can see where this group of clowns can identify with bullying and trying to over power people, But I do feel that Ryan is at least being true to himself in considering any fetus a life. This is not my belief,, and it is totally disregarding the life of the mother because they are idiots, but at least it is consistent on one level.
I just cannot understand why the concern over life ends at birth. How can you be against abortion but for the death penalty or cutting school lunches for poor kids or health care. I don't understand, even if you only think of life up to birth why deny mothers free medical prenatal care?
I give up, thee people t hink in a muddle and I will never understand it.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)But they don't care what happens to anyone else than themselves from birth to death.
They.Just.Don't.Care.
donheld
(21,311 posts)rasputin1952
(83,130 posts)this election.
I know the "stupid gene" runs strongly through this bunch, but I would figure that there is a limit to just how powerful that is...apparently there is no limit.
As long as these idiots keep speaking, they lose any chance they have at coming out on top.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)Hell, he even support stimulus ... well, if it's his favorite "strong, handsome, white male Republican" fuhr ... I mean, leader ...
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)No.Of course not.It would be the height of silliness to assume that.You would NEED a lobotomy to align yourself with the teabags.....
Having HAD a lobotomy would have remedied the illness,at least in theory...Stupid mixed with batshit crazy is powerful....
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)madashelltoo
(1,696 posts)Pryderi
(6,772 posts)No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Maybe we should classify sperm as soldiers...
-watching my dvred "Up With Chris Hayes"
Proles
(466 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)& Rec !!!
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Despite the headline, he did not say "Rape is just another method of conception". Not even close. His actual words and belief are bad enough without twisting it and losing credibility for our side (pro-choice).
What he said is "the method of conception doesnt change the definition of life.
He obviously means "rape is not an excuse for an abortion". He feels that a maritally fertilized egg cell has personhood just as much as a rapist fertilized egg cell. He cosponsored legislation that confers personhood on a fertilized egg cell. The consequence of that is that there can be no abortions period not even for the life of the mother.
Botany
(70,489 posts)Im very proud of my pro-life record, and Ive always adopted the idea that, the position that the method of conception doesnt change the definition of life, Ryan explained. But lets remember, Im joining the Romney-Ryan ticket. And the president makes policy.
And the president, in this case the future President Mitt Romney, has exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother, which is a vast improvement of where we are right now.
BrainMann1
(460 posts)or the fact that Paulie boy here looks like he sounds. He's a cross between Popeye (without the pipe) and Alice the goon. If you stair at him to long you may jump off a bridge. He is the new and improved GOP poster boy.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)can't get on the story.
valerief
(53,235 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)You either think that the fetus trumps the woman as "innocent life" in every situation, or you admit that the woman has some input.
He shows the real agenda - the woman herself is less important than her function of reproducing.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Texas Lawyer
(350 posts)meow2u3
(24,761 posts)then forcible castration is "just another method of contraception."
Woman-hating pervert with rape fantasies, that Paul Ryan. He thinks a vicious criminal act is just another way to make a baby. Is he on meth?
ddx
(1 post)Ryan to say stealing is just another form of a business transaction.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Diclotican
(5,095 posts)tonybgood
WHAT?????
When you believe they can't lover the bar, they do... HE should be thrown off the ticket for the vice-presidency of the united states for this...
But he play for the core, and they understand what he says, very well...
Some year ago I saw a film, about a girl and his mother who had to leave the US to make an abort because the girl was raped - and the US in the "future" was a country where abort, or any other form of control was forbidden - I found it just to be another "dystopia" who might never happend... Today I am not to sure - it looks like the US are indeed on the road to a country where this things is strictly forbidden.
I just hope enough americans vote this persons out of the scene - they should be kept in mental wards.. and getting help for the problems they must have to speak out loud what they are thinking in their mind..
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)fucking idiot and a nincompoop. EOS
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Hula Popper
(374 posts)where do they get these ass holes?