Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwo very different executions show the Supreme Court's anti-blackness and Islamophobia
If there were any lingering doubts about the Supreme Courts anti-blackness and Islamophobia, the recent decision to stay the execution of a Texas man who was denied a Buddhist spiritual adviser should put them to rest.
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to grant a stay on the execution of Patrick Henry Murphy unless the state permits his Buddhist spiritual adviser to be in the execution room with him.
In contrast, last month, when Alabama death row prisoner Domineque Ray, a black Muslim, appealed for a stay on his execution because the Alabama Department of Corrections would not allow him to have an Imam present in the death chamber, the Supreme Court vacated his appeal. Ray was later executed with his Imam viewing his death from an adjacent room.
--------------
Moreover, what the two cases in contrast reveal, is that the issue of process and procedure used to deny Ray of a spiritual adviser in the death chamber was nothing more than a thinly-veiled disguise to the overt anti-blackness and Islamophobia at play. Thats why SCOTUS could unabashedly state in Murphys case that, The State may not carry out Murphys execution pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari unless the State permits Murphys Buddhist spiritual advisor or another Buddhist reverend of the States choosing to accompany Murphy in the execution chamber during the execution.
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to grant a stay on the execution of Patrick Henry Murphy unless the state permits his Buddhist spiritual adviser to be in the execution room with him.
In contrast, last month, when Alabama death row prisoner Domineque Ray, a black Muslim, appealed for a stay on his execution because the Alabama Department of Corrections would not allow him to have an Imam present in the death chamber, the Supreme Court vacated his appeal. Ray was later executed with his Imam viewing his death from an adjacent room.
--------------
Moreover, what the two cases in contrast reveal, is that the issue of process and procedure used to deny Ray of a spiritual adviser in the death chamber was nothing more than a thinly-veiled disguise to the overt anti-blackness and Islamophobia at play. Thats why SCOTUS could unabashedly state in Murphys case that, The State may not carry out Murphys execution pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari unless the State permits Murphys Buddhist spiritual advisor or another Buddhist reverend of the States choosing to accompany Murphy in the execution chamber during the execution.
[link:https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-death-row-inmates-rights-executions-religious-minorities-1d4205827eb5/|
Systemic and systematic...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 679 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two very different executions show the Supreme Court's anti-blackness and Islamophobia (Original Post)
Soph0571
Mar 2019
OP
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. Maybe, but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/07/us/politics/supreme-court-domineque-ray.html
Several points made in this article, not the least that the Supremes dragged this case up before the full circuit court could hear it.
But, the Alabama prison reasoning was essentially that only the prison chaplain was allowed in and was supposed to, like military chaplains, take care of all religious beliefs. You couldn't ask for your own parish priest or rabbi, either. Don't even think about a wiccan.
You could argue that this is bullshit, but it does make the situation less clear. And it's not clear if Texas had the same rules denying your own spiritual advisor
I do, however, have little doubt that the majority on the Court used the Scalia excuse of late filing to make it go away.
Several points made in this article, not the least that the Supremes dragged this case up before the full circuit court could hear it.
But, the Alabama prison reasoning was essentially that only the prison chaplain was allowed in and was supposed to, like military chaplains, take care of all religious beliefs. You couldn't ask for your own parish priest or rabbi, either. Don't even think about a wiccan.
You could argue that this is bullshit, but it does make the situation less clear. And it's not clear if Texas had the same rules denying your own spiritual advisor
I do, however, have little doubt that the majority on the Court used the Scalia excuse of late filing to make it go away.
The chaplain was allowed to be present, the officials went on, because he was an employee of the prison system who was a member of the execution team and was familiar with the technicalities of the execution protocol, having attended almost every execution in the state since 1997. The chaplain kneels and prays with inmates who seek pastoral care, the officials said. After considering Mr. Rays request, prison officials agreed to exclude the chaplain. But they said allowing the imam to be present raised unacceptable safety concerns.