When is a summary not a summary?
By Jennifer Rubin
Opinion writer
March 30 at 5:37 PM
For a week, criticism rained down on Attorney General William P. Barr. Why did his letter advising Congress of the end of the probe contain his own opinion on obstruction of justice? Why did he not lay out basic information such as the size of the report from special counsel Robert S. Mueller III?
On Friday, Barr seemed to concede that his critics had a point. A new letter was sent to Congress, a sign either that the criticism had personally stung or that Barr worried, once released, the actual report would demonstrate his initial letter was nothing more than political spin to defend his boss.
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti observes that he is likely pushing back because calling it a summary suggests that the letter accurately summarizes the entire report, and it does not do so. Moreover, by hiding even the length of the report in the first letter, Barr helped President Trump perpetuate the assertion that Mueller hadnt found much of anything. If it took almost 400 pages to lay out his findings, we can bet theres plenty of interest to the American people.
Other Justice Department veterans agree that Barr is playing defense. I think hes clearly a bit stung by the criticism hes gotten this week, and this letter was his attempt to look like he is committed to transparency without actually making any new commitments, says former Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/31/when-is-summary-not-a-summary/?utm_term=.f36a4a901e77