Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,077 posts)
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 08:55 AM Aug 2012

NY Times: Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent


Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent

By JULIET MACUR
Published: August 24, 2012


The morning after Lance Armstrong gave up his fight against doping accusations, Travis Tygart, the chief executive of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, which brought the most recent drug charges against Armstrong, received an unexpected phone call.

He said it was from yet another person who was offering information about the systematic doping that the agency claims occurred on Armstrong’s Tour de France-winning teams.

“At the end of the day, a lot of people knew the truth, but they were silenced by the internal pressure from the team to keep everything secret,” Tygart said, adding, “This is the most witnesses we’ve ever had in any case come forward.”

Tygart would not divulge the names of any of the witnesses. But one thing was clear: they were the crux of the antidoping agency’s evidence against Armstrong. And in the doping world, that is known as a nonanalytical positive — an athlete implicated not by a positive drug test but by supporting evidence. ......................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/sports/cycling/antidoping-officials-move-to-wipe-out-armstrongs-titles.html?_r=1&ref=sports



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times: Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent (Original Post) marmar Aug 2012 OP
A devastating piece against Armstrong. trumad Aug 2012 #1
are there apologists? NoMoreWarNow Aug 2012 #3
Check the sport forum---we gotta a couple. trumad Aug 2012 #4
Agreed. If it was only one or two people throwing out allegations, that would be one thing. Nye Bevan Aug 2012 #5
thought this might be about Neil NoMoreWarNow Aug 2012 #2
 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
3. are there apologists?
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 10:20 AM
Aug 2012

by now, even the blind should be able to see how rampant doping was in this sport.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
5. Agreed. If it was only one or two people throwing out allegations, that would be one thing.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

But we are supposed to believe that many, many people who have been in Armstrong's circle over the years have suddenly decided to make stuff up about him? Why would people do this to a popular, successful, cancer survivor? And risk being sued for slander? Why would people do this to Armstrong and not Derek Jeter, Peyton Manning or Michael Phelps?

This is one of the clearest applications of Occam's razor that I have ever seen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY Times: Witnesses Made ...