Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNY Times: Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent
Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent
By JULIET MACUR
Published: August 24, 2012
The morning after Lance Armstrong gave up his fight against doping accusations, Travis Tygart, the chief executive of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, which brought the most recent drug charges against Armstrong, received an unexpected phone call.
He said it was from yet another person who was offering information about the systematic doping that the agency claims occurred on Armstrongs Tour de France-winning teams.
At the end of the day, a lot of people knew the truth, but they were silenced by the internal pressure from the team to keep everything secret, Tygart said, adding, This is the most witnesses weve ever had in any case come forward.
Tygart would not divulge the names of any of the witnesses. But one thing was clear: they were the crux of the antidoping agencys evidence against Armstrong. And in the doping world, that is known as a nonanalytical positive an athlete implicated not by a positive drug test but by supporting evidence. ......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/sports/cycling/antidoping-officials-move-to-wipe-out-armstrongs-titles.html?_r=1&ref=sports
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1432 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times: Witnesses Made Case Against Armstrong Potent (Original Post)
marmar
Aug 2012
OP
trumad
(41,692 posts)1. A devastating piece against Armstrong.
I have no idea how the apologists can just blow by this.
NoMoreWarNow
(1,259 posts)3. are there apologists?
by now, even the blind should be able to see how rampant doping was in this sport.
trumad
(41,692 posts)4. Check the sport forum---we gotta a couple.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)5. Agreed. If it was only one or two people throwing out allegations, that would be one thing.
But we are supposed to believe that many, many people who have been in Armstrong's circle over the years have suddenly decided to make stuff up about him? Why would people do this to a popular, successful, cancer survivor? And risk being sued for slander? Why would people do this to Armstrong and not Derek Jeter, Peyton Manning or Michael Phelps?
This is one of the clearest applications of Occam's razor that I have ever seen.
NoMoreWarNow
(1,259 posts)2. thought this might be about Neil
first Lance went down, then Neil...