Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(102,192 posts)
Tue May 7, 2019, 05:38 PM May 2019

WAPO: Barr has set himself up -- and Trump -- for embarrassment

In the words of Laurence Tribe: "Read this @JRubinBlogger piece to see what @Mimirocah1, @JoyceWhiteVance, and I agree Barr has all but invited SDNY, the AG of NY, and the Manhattan DA to do to Trump"




https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/07/barr-sets-himself-trump-up-body-blows/?utm_term=.da02b013f98e

--snip--
Barr has now set a bevvy of traps for himself.
On the spying front, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, perhaps the only top Justice Department official not to have sullied his own reputation, repudiated Barr’s conspiracy-mongering. The Post reports:

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray said Tuesday that he would not call the investigation of Trump campaign advisers in 2016 “spying’’ — distancing himself from language used by President Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr.

That’s not the term I would use,” Wray said in response to a question from Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) during a congressional hearing about the FBI’s budget. ...

Shaheen pressed him further, asking whether he had any evidence that illegal surveillance was conducted on individuals associated with the campaign.

“I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort,” Wray said.


--snip--
The biggest error Barr made might have been in postulating that the OLC memo still leaves open the opportunity for prosecutors to opine on indictment, even if they cannot indict. (The argument makes no sense, given the major reasoning behind the OLC memo is that a president cannot have the threat of prosecution hanging over his head.) That argument, however, opens the door to opining on grounds for Trump’s indictment. --snip--
Barr and Trump’s problem doesn’t end there. If Barr (and Mueller) can offer their views on Trump’s criminal liability, so can the Southern District of New York prosecutors investigating Trump’s possible financial wrongdoing. “I think they could,” former prosecutor Mimi Rocah, a signatory to the prosecutors’ letter, tells me. “I don’t know if they will.” Other legal experts, including former prosecutor Joyce White Vance (who also signed the letter) and constitutional lawyer Laurence Tribe, agree. “They clearly should,” Tribe says. “I see no legal, ethical, or political downside. And these days it’s really rare to encounter a way forward that yields no minuses, but some distinct pluses.”


more at the link above

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAPO: Barr has set himself up -- and Trump -- for embarrassment (Original Post) hlthe2b May 2019 OP
Here's more on FBI Director Wray's Senate testimony contradicting Barr's "spying" accusations hlthe2b May 2019 #1
ppl like this aren't capable of humility. nt Kurt V. May 2019 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WAPO: Barr has set himsel...