Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew: Nadler may have to use subpoena to compel Mueller testimony.
Link to tweet
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/443128-nadler-says-mueller-will-not-be-testifying-next-week
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 844 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New: Nadler may have to use subpoena to compel Mueller testimony. (Original Post)
triron
May 2019
OP
manor321
(3,344 posts)1. If only there was some sort of formalized inquiry that would make these requests stronger
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. Barr won't let Mueller
testify. Nadler is following the correct procedure with continued talks with the DOJ. After talks have been exhausted, subpoena would be the next step.
There is a process that the House need to do first because all of this obstruction will eventually wind up in court or in the alternative . . impeachment proceedings.
I prefer to Nadler's tweet not the Hill.
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)3. The other night Nadler told Rachel Maddow
that Mueller and he were working on a May15th meeting and that being employed at the DOJ doesn't matter regarding Mueller's ability to testify. So what's the problem? Why isn't Mueller willing to do this? Why force Nadler to issue a subpoena and waste more time?
angrychair
(8,686 posts)4. The half truths in this article are disturbing
Mueller ultimately did not find evidence to charge members of Trumps campaign
That's because he didn't actually look. Based on the evidence in the report with respect to the trump tower Moscow and the trump tower meeting in NY, there is no evidence to support an actual investigation into the specifics of that deal, no counter-intelligence or that witnesses were cooperating enough to determine what actually happened, one way or the other.
It's why Mueller said this on pg 2 Volume I:
A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.
Or this pg.12, Vol I:
n the course of conducting that investigation, the Office periodically identified evidence of potential criminal activity that was outside the scope of the Special Counsel's authority established by the Acting Attorney General
Or the best quote in the whole thing, pg.76, Vol I:
the evidence does indicate that a thorough FBI investigation would uncover facts about the campaign and the President personally that the President could have understood to be crimes or that would give rise to personal and political concerns.
Its not as straightforward as some make it out to be.