Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Thu May 16, 2019, 07:49 AM May 2019

Idaho just hard-Brexited itself

https://fee.org/articles/idaho-repealed-its-entire-regulatory-code-now-what/

This is psychotic

My friend and former student Paul Gerner suggested to me a few years ago that the federal government have a “regulatory reset.” The idea is that the government eliminates all regulations and then brings back the ones it decides it wants. Presumably, we would end up with substantially fewer regulations.

I loved the idea but it boggled my mind. How would that work? What would happen to certain industries and lots of people who depend on some degree of certainty in making their plans? And, of course, aside from the issue of how it would work, neither Paul nor I thought the federal government would ever do it.

I still think that. But James Broughel, a senior research fellow with the Mercatus Center, points out that that’s exactly what Idaho’s state government has just done. He writes:

Something rather remarkable just happened in Idaho. The state legislature opted to—in essence—repeal the entire state regulatory code. The cause may have been dysfunction across legislative chambers, but the result is serendipitous. A new governor is presented with an unprecedented opportunity to repeal an outdated and burdensome regulatory code and replace it with a more streamlined and sensible set of rules. Other states should be paying close attention.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Idaho just hard-Brexited itself (Original Post) Recursion May 2019 OP
Wait for the litigations to flow. BSdetect May 2019 #1
The plural of litigation usually is litigation. rzemanfl May 2019 #5
Absolutely NO! Scoopster May 2019 #2
The headline doesn't actually represent what happened. enough May 2019 #3
What's the difference? zipplewrath May 2019 #4
+1 2naSalit May 2019 #6

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. What's the difference?
Thu May 16, 2019, 08:48 AM
May 2019
Instead, the legislature wrapped up an acrimonious session in April without passing a rule-reauthorization bill. As a result, come July 1, some 8,200 pages of regulations containing 736 chapters of state rules will expire. Any rules the governor opts to keep will have to be implemented as emergency regulations, and the legislature will consider them anew when it returns next January.


What distinction are you making?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Idaho just hard-Brexited ...