The only people I hear saying Pelosi has taken impeachment "off the table" are pundits

[EffieBlack]

and critics among the base.

Same goes for the claim that Democrats are reluctant to impeach out of fear we'll lose 2020. Not hearing any of this from Democratic leadership or Members - just from the press and naysayers within the party.

I've noticed several Members lately correcting interviewers when they premise their questions on these erroneous assertions.

[pnwmom]

1. Yes. Either out of stupidity or trying to stir up a controversy they keep twisting her words.

She has never taken it off the table and neither has Nadler.

[Wellstone ruled]

2. Yup,you are so right.

The worst is Chuckie Toad and the MSNBC Day Crew.

[empedocles]

6. - and some of the 'activists' here are pretty negative

[Wellstone ruled]

9. Can not imagine what it would be like having

Hoyer or someone else as Speaker. We are damn lucky Pelosi is running the show.

[applegrove]

3. Seem to be a whole pile of anti Pelosi tweets again today. Maybe the GOP

are going to make her a boogey woman again.

[EffieBlack]

7. You noticed that too?

Interesting, isn't it?

Funny how every thread praising her gets swarmed by the same people who just can't criticize her enough.

I don't it's a coincidence.

[applegrove]

14. Yup. Quite sudden rushing tsunami of anti Pelosiness. Today is May 16th.

I'm bookmarking the Day.

[mcar]

17. Oh yeah, it's been slam Pelosi day

Yesterday too. Gotta wonder...

[empedocles]

4. One would hardly know, from the negatives thrown at the Speaker, that Pelosi

has outmaneuvered trump pretty soundly for 7 months.

[Hotler]

5. If impeachment was going to happen it would have already started.

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

[solara]

15. ICYMI Impeachment HAS already started

Pelosi said, “One of the purposes that the Constitution spells out for investigation is impeachment, and so you can say, and the courts would respect if you said, we need this information to carry out our oversight responsibilities, and among them is impeachment. It doesn’t mean you’re going on an impeachment path, but it means if you had the information, you might. So, it isn’t about impeachment. It’s about impeachment as a purpose, a constitutional purpose for and justifying constitutionally and court wise a path.”

ead More: https://www.politicususa.com/2019/05/16/nancy-pelosi-trump-impeachment.html

[Hotler]

18. Well bless your heart. I disagree, but thanks for trying to convince me otherwise.

you have a good day.

[malaise]

8. The same ones who cheered on the Con

Hacks are everywhere with their corporate agenda

[EffieBlack]

10. Some of them seem to be right in our midst ...

[Me.]

11. Right On Effie

Even had to turn off Nicole today. They were all losing their minds and of course Eddie Glaude (Obama critic) had a mouthful of nothing but slamming Dems, to say aside from there is a war in the party.phew, phew, phew... Heidi P. was the only one who stayed close to sanity. And another thing I'm sick of is the 'I've been talking to people across the country'..."sources inside the Con party"...blah, blah blah. Don't believe they've been talking to people across the country for one teeny second and whenever I hear the one or 2 people they've talked to (probably friends or family) likened to a multitude, I call foul. Yamiche Alcindor and Jacob Soboroff kept pulling that line all during the last election and used it to slant things ala BS which was such nonsense.

THey're all pushing a line and haven't taken the time to think about what or why the Dems are doing what they are doing. These are the same people who told us Nancy was finished, over, done.

[EffieBlack]

12. Truth!

Like you, I'm sick of them saying they're "talking to people across the country " I keep thinking "When do you have time to talk to anyone? You spend 24-7 sitting in studios running your mouth. Who did you talk to? Your college roommate between interviews?"

[Stinky The Clown]

13. Yup

[mcar]

16. I've seen it a lot here and other SM sites

Same old, same old.