Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(43,135 posts)
Sat May 18, 2019, 08:32 AM May 2019

Many Trump judicial nominees won't affirm the Brown v Board ruling. That concerns some legal experts

The Supreme Court decision 65 years ago ruling that segregating schools by race was unconstitutional is widely viewed as settled to many Americans. But there is concern among some in the legal community that that might not exactly be the case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/17/many-trump-judicial-nominees-wont-affirm-brown-v-board-ruling-that-concerns-some-legal-experts/

More than two dozen of President Trump’s judicial nominees have declined to answer whether Brown v. Board of Education was properly decided, and legal experts said that that could have real implications on education and race in the United States.

The most recent example came when Wendy Vitter, who was confirmed Thursday as a federal district judge in Louisiana, declined to clearly affirm the decision. She said:

“I don’t mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult, difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions — which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with. If I start commenting on, ‘I agree with this case,’ or ‘don’t agree with this case,’ I think we get into a slippery slope.”


Responses like Vitter’s are why the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights released a letter this week urging U.S. senators to oppose all judicial nominees (Vitter included) who refuse to state clearly that the landmark Supreme Court ruling was correctly decided. For them, the Brown decision is about much more than education.

snip
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many Trump judicial nominees won't affirm the Brown v Board ruling. That concerns some legal experts (Original Post) Celerity May 2019 OP
The drumpf administration et al doesn't give a damn about laws. democratisphere May 2019 #1
Sounds to me like they are willing to give cover to private and/or religious schools underpants May 2019 #2
try opening it a a new window in Incognito mode nt Celerity May 2019 #4
We knew this was coming. DavidDvorkin May 2019 #3

underpants

(182,632 posts)
2. Sounds to me like they are willing to give cover to private and/or religious schools
Sat May 18, 2019, 08:44 AM
May 2019

can't get the WaPo article- ran out of free for the month.

I just can't imagine how this could be exercised in this day and age other than allowing private charter and religious schools to discriminate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Many Trump judicial nomin...