Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Mueller mislead the American public? (Original Post) SHRED May 2019 OP
He was quoting the OLC memos, which opined that indicting a sitting president The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #1
Two separate things. Sitting president can't be indicted per DOJ policy; there is a constitutional Dream Girl May 2019 #2
Because he is a coward. BeckyDem May 2019 #3
He explained specifically in his statement that it is the official DOJ policy. PoliticAverse May 2019 #4
Why are YOU misleading DUers? EffieBlack May 2019 #5
Habit? nt GemDigger May 2019 #7
Not exactly what he said... GemDigger May 2019 #6

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,588 posts)
1. He was quoting the OLC memos, which opined that indicting a sitting president
Wed May 29, 2019, 12:58 PM
May 2019

would be unconstitutional. This has never been tested in court, but it's what those two memos, in 1973 and again in 2000, concluded. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
2. Two separate things. Sitting president can't be indicted per DOJ policy; there is a constitutional
Wed May 29, 2019, 12:59 PM
May 2019

remedy for dealing with unlawful behavior -impeachment. It is unconstitutional in that there is a legal remedy and it is not
indictment. It was a bit unclear how he said it, but pretty sure that's what he meant...

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
4. He explained specifically in his statement that it is the official DOJ policy.
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:04 PM
May 2019

Which is as we know based on the 2000 OLC opinion: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

There has been 19 years since that opinion and many chances for the DOJ to change that policy and yet no Attorney General has.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
5. Why are YOU misleading DUers?
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:07 PM
May 2019

Surely you know that Mueller didn't say he believes it's unconstitutional, but said that DOJ policy is that it's unconstitutional.

GemDigger

(4,305 posts)
6. Not exactly what he said...
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:08 PM
May 2019

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime. The introduction to the volume two of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited. The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice and by regulation it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider. "

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/29/18644237/robert-mueller-remarks-transcript

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Mueller mislead t...