Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeceased G.O.P. Strategist's Hard Drives Reveal New Details on the Census Citizenship Question
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/census-citizenship-question-hofeller.htmlWASHINGTON Thomas B. Hofeller achieved near-mythic status in the Republican Party as the Michelangelo of gerrymandering, the architect of partisan political maps that cemented the partys dominance across the country.
But after he died last summer, his estranged daughter discovered hard drives in her fathers home that revealed something else: Mr. Hofeller had played a crucial role in the Trump administrations decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
Files on those drives showed that he wrote a study in 2015 concluding that adding a citizenship question to the census would allow Republicans to draft even more extreme gerrymandered maps to stymie Democrats. And months after urging President Trumps transition team to tack the question onto the census, he wrote the key portion of a draft Justice Department letter claiming the question was needed to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act the rationale the administration later used to justify its decision.
Those documents, cited in a federal court filing Thursday by opponents seeking to block the citizenship question, have emerged only weeks before the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the citizenship question. Critics say adding the question would deter many immigrants from being counted and shift political power to Republican areas.
The disclosures represent the most explicit evidence to date that the Trump administration added the question to the 2020 census to advance Republican Party interests.
But after he died last summer, his estranged daughter discovered hard drives in her fathers home that revealed something else: Mr. Hofeller had played a crucial role in the Trump administrations decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
Files on those drives showed that he wrote a study in 2015 concluding that adding a citizenship question to the census would allow Republicans to draft even more extreme gerrymandered maps to stymie Democrats. And months after urging President Trumps transition team to tack the question onto the census, he wrote the key portion of a draft Justice Department letter claiming the question was needed to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act the rationale the administration later used to justify its decision.
Those documents, cited in a federal court filing Thursday by opponents seeking to block the citizenship question, have emerged only weeks before the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the citizenship question. Critics say adding the question would deter many immigrants from being counted and shift political power to Republican areas.
The disclosures represent the most explicit evidence to date that the Trump administration added the question to the 2020 census to advance Republican Party interests.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 850 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deceased G.O.P. Strategist's Hard Drives Reveal New Details on the Census Citizenship Question (Original Post)
CousinIT
May 2019
OP
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)1. Kick and recommend.
CousinIT
(9,218 posts)2. GOP operative on 2020 census citizenship ?: It "would clearly be a disadvantage to the Democrats"
Link to tweet
New docs show that architect of GOP gerrymandering was behind Trump's push to add citizenship question to 2020 census, said it "would clearly be a disadvantage to the Democrats & advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic
Whites (link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6077715-May-30-2019-Letter-to-Judge-Jesse-Furman.html) documentcloud.org/documents/6077
Whites (link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6077715-May-30-2019-Letter-to-Judge-Jesse-Furman.html) documentcloud.org/documents/6077
dalton99a
(81,392 posts)3. "Don't reveal more than necessary", "Emails are the tool of the devil"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/obituaries/thomas-hofeller-republican-master-of-political-maps-dies-at-75.html
But later, as the leading Republican drafter of partisan maps, he became their advocate, educating party activists in the art and importance of skillfully drawn boundaries. His PowerPoint presentation won a reputation for what came to be called Hofellerisms, slides that issued sometimes-hokey advice like Dont get cute, remember, this IS legislation! Dont reveal more than necessary and Emails are the tool of the devil.
Mr. Hofeller practiced what he preached. In 2017, deposed under oath in a federal lawsuit challenging his North Carolina House maps, he left prosecutors empty-handed when they sought evidence of the instructions state Republicans had given him.
There were no instructions given to you in writing? they asked.
No, Mr. Hofeller replied.
Theres no paper trail against which we can evaluate your description of the instructions?
I dont believe so, no.
But you advised them not to give you instructions in writing, to do so orally?
I dont recollect that, Mr. Hofeller said.
Mr. Hofeller practiced what he preached. In 2017, deposed under oath in a federal lawsuit challenging his North Carolina House maps, he left prosecutors empty-handed when they sought evidence of the instructions state Republicans had given him.
There were no instructions given to you in writing? they asked.
No, Mr. Hofeller replied.
Theres no paper trail against which we can evaluate your description of the instructions?
I dont believe so, no.
But you advised them not to give you instructions in writing, to do so orally?
I dont recollect that, Mr. Hofeller said.