General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo if you break the law to win the Presidency, you can then use the office to avoid prosecution?
How is that the DOJ's policy? And isn't the moral of that story that you should break every law possible to win the White House, just so long as you win?
None of that makes any sense whatsoever.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,013 posts)imaginary girl
(861 posts)Isn't it a bit like robbing a bank and using the stolen money to avoid prosecution? I agree that it doesn't make sense.
JenniferJuniper
(4,510 posts)At least the bank robber would be charged.
lame54
(35,282 posts)He will beat the statute of limitations
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)that broke the law. So say, if a President engaged in a conspiracy to cover up some illegal actions that got them elected they could be removed from office (and then possibly prosecuted).[1]
And the DOJ is a unit of the executive branch under the President so you can't really rely on it to be prosecuting a President that broke the law.
[1] http://watergate.info/impeachment/articles-of-impeachment
onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)Especially when one party and elements of DOJ is part of it and the other party is impotent.
Response to Bleacher Creature (Original post)
Maven This message was self-deleted by its author.
dogman
(6,073 posts)sagesnow
(2,824 posts)DeSmet
(257 posts)is the while being investigated by a special counsel, the president doesn't have to recuse himself.
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)to (R)'s silly. They love borderline mentally challenged candidates, who are easily manipulated. tRump is not running the country, McConnell is.
triron
(21,995 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,862 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)...is the new normal.
We've got a national infection.
Iggo
(47,548 posts)tymorial
(3,433 posts)America.