Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why should North Korea or any country denuclearize? (Original Post) raccoon Jul 2019 OP
Depends on whether you trust your allies' security guarantees. Eugene Jul 2019 #1
How about Libya? dem4decades Jul 2019 #2
IDK, What's the deal with them? Nt raccoon Jul 2019 #4
What I would like to know Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2019 #3
My question is when will the US denuclearize malaise Jul 2019 #5
Two good reasons, as far as NK goes DFW Jul 2019 #6

Eugene

(61,859 posts)
1. Depends on whether you trust your allies' security guarantees.
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 02:38 PM
Jul 2019

South Korea and Taiwan are nuclear capable. They rely on the U.S. Iran thought they could trust the world powers, until Trump came along.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,402 posts)
3. What I would like to know
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 02:42 PM
Jul 2019

is, can the US ever be counted on to honor any of our agreements one President makes with other countries if the next President can easily back out of them? Note: I'm not saying we can't re-evaluate agreements if new circumstances arise, but it shouldn't be an easy process or shouldn't be for specious reasons (i.e. not liking the previous President)

malaise

(268,885 posts)
5. My question is when will the US denuclearize
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 03:49 PM
Jul 2019

after all they're the only country to nuke another country.
Who is monitoring US nukes with that lunatic at the helm?

DFW

(54,334 posts)
6. Two good reasons, as far as NK goes
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 03:58 PM
Jul 2019

First, there will never be any rational reason for them to use a nuclear weapon.

Second, if they ever WERE to use a nuclear weapon AS a weapon, they would not survive long to tweet about it. Not worth it. They can threaten all they want, but their threat would be more credible if it were made with something they CAN use without China, Japan, Russia or China obliterating them 90 seconds after deployment. They have something like 5% of their population in uniform and armed. That is enough to deter any hostile invasion. Even China wouldn't have THAT many body bags in stock if they were to try it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why should North Korea or...