General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge throws a drunk driver's mother in jail for laughing at victim's family in court:
This was back in April, but love this judge's reaction!
Link to tweet
Turin_C3PO
(13,964 posts)Good for that judge!
Response to George II (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lefta Dissenter
(6,622 posts)...well, your mouth got you 93 days.
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)And her goddamn family was laughing
The judge was too nice:
Your disruptive and disrespectful behavior disrupted todays proceedings and you, maam, are going to the Wayne County Jail for 93 days, said Lillard, as the woman whispered something back under her breath.
Amanda Kosal was sentenced to 3 to 15 years in prison for the deadly drunk driving crash that killed Zirker, a father of five, reports WDIV. Her mother, Donna, appeared back in court Friday in front of Lillard. She apologized and her sentence was reportedly reduced to one day in jail, time served.
Response to dalton99a (Reply #4)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,377 posts)zaj
(3,433 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,632 posts)cab67
(2,992 posts)Response to zaj (Reply #8)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)an exceedingly rare thing either. Judges can and will cite people for disrupting their courtroom or demonstrating disrespect during proceedings. I saw it happen once out of the two juries I've served on.
zaj
(3,433 posts)It wasn't an issue of disruption of the proceedings, it was a disrespectful act toward victims.
This woman should fight this in court, IMO. She may be a hatefilled jerk, but she's a hatefilled jerk with rights.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Your concern sounds as specious as telling someone an earned confidence is "arrogance which doesn't serve you well."
No one is arguing she does not have rights; you merely lack relevant knowledge of what contempt entails.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)treat the judicial process with disdain and contempt. She can laugh all she wants outside the courtroom. You don't seem to appreciate what constitutes contempt and is citable. Clearly the judge does. Only way she could successfully "fight it" would be to apologize to the court. The judge is responsible for pretty much every aspect of their courtroom.
I saw someone cited for coughing. Sounds innocuous enough, doesn't it? However, the individual was obviously feigning it and timing the coughs to express an opinion about one of the witnesses and rattle him during his testimony. Would you say if coughing is a crime, we have a problem?