Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump-administration asked court in census-case to pretend that piece of evidence no longer exists.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/07/administration-literally-tells-court-to-forget-about-previous-reason-it-wanted-to-include-citizenship-question/Calling the administrations court filing an act of political chutzpah, elections law expert Rick Hasen perfectly encapsulates what just happened:
In a new filing, the Department of Justice has told the federal district court in Maryland considering whether the addition of the citizenship question on the census was done for reasons of racial animus that the government may still come forward with a reason for including the question. Further, the government argues that any new reason would have to be judged by its own terms, as the courts did in the travel ban case. It wants to stop all discovery of bad motives for the original decision as no longer relevant.
Hasen adds, more importantly, DOJ is arguing for what Joshua Matz has termed animus cleansing. Forget if we had discriminatory racial intent before in adding a question, DOJ argues, because any new decision would be fresh and pure. And because of this purity, theres no need to look whether the government had discriminatory intent to start with. Presto! Nothing to see here court, please move on.
In a new filing, the Department of Justice has told the federal district court in Maryland considering whether the addition of the citizenship question on the census was done for reasons of racial animus that the government may still come forward with a reason for including the question. Further, the government argues that any new reason would have to be judged by its own terms, as the courts did in the travel ban case. It wants to stop all discovery of bad motives for the original decision as no longer relevant.
Hasen adds, more importantly, DOJ is arguing for what Joshua Matz has termed animus cleansing. Forget if we had discriminatory racial intent before in adding a question, DOJ argues, because any new decision would be fresh and pure. And because of this purity, theres no need to look whether the government had discriminatory intent to start with. Presto! Nothing to see here court, please move on.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2721 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (43)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump-administration asked court in census-case to pretend that piece of evidence no longer exists. (Original Post)
DetlefK
Jul 2019
OP
paleotn
(17,884 posts)1. That dog just won't hunt.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)2. Yeah, but this is why Republicans and Independent conservatives
love Trump. They don't believe the rule of law applies to them.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)7. The Republicans have been working on rigging
The judiciary for the last 40 years and have gone full tilt in the last 20...
That dog might well hunt today.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)3. Please let Rachel be on tonight!
She'll have a blast with this!
Dem Dean
(81 posts)4. This one's for Donnie:
JohnnyRingo
(18,619 posts)5. Federal judges have supernova egos.
They can't even be fired. I wouldn't try to bully one into compliance.
In this case, Barr seems to think there's a wink & a nod to help the team. Or else he's desperate.
*boom*
Mc Mike
(9,111 posts)6. Dershowitz is teaching a "Memory Hole Plea Filing" course this fall at Harvard Law.
pecosbob
(7,533 posts)8. This makes me think of Jon Lovitz' character 'the Liar'