General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPelosi: Our Founders designed a democracy governed by the people -- not a monarchy.
Link to tweet
Ahem...
Supreme Court gives Trump go-ahead on border wall
All the Republican-appointed justices voted in favor of allowing Trump to proceed with that aspect of his plan while litigation over the issue continues. All the Democratic-appointed justices dissented, except for Justice Stephen Breyer who said he would have allowed the contracting process to move forward but blocked actual construction.
[link:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/26/trump-border-wall-supreme-court-1437894|
Yet another example of the growing democratic deficit in the West
SunSeeker
(51,523 posts)lark
(23,065 posts)They had to ensure the purchase of billions of dollars of (defective?) Russian Deripaska steel, PUtin demanded it to keep up his protection racket.
watoos
(7,142 posts)but he won because the court said the plaintiffs didn't have standing. This decision isn't over by a long shot.
Hey, when a Democrat wins in 2020 she can take billions of dollars from the pentagon and put it to good use like into renewable energy. Thank you SC.
Farmer-Rick
(10,140 posts)Specifically identifying funding can NOT be used on a stupid ass medieval wall.
Then the biased and corrupt Supremes can't get it wrong.
But basically the crooks and rapists on the Supremes decided that the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition do not have standing. Why didn't the House file a claim?
"The statement suggested that the five justices in the majority agreed with the Trump administrations arguments that the groups who obtained the injunction, the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, lacked a valid legal mechanism to enforce the budget rider."