General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom The Atlantic: Impeachment, But Without the Moral Clarity
The final four paragraphs of the essay:
"...If Fridays press conference was a declaration of anything, it was lost in the confusion. The trouble with bringing urgent moral questions down to the level of political horse-trading is that the urgency dissolves, and with it the sense of moral crisis that House Democrats worked so hard over the course of Muellers testimony to build up.
Is moral clarity too much to expect? The process of impeachment is a political judgment, assigned by the Constitution to the branch of government that is both the most politically sensitive and, with its hundreds of members, the most challenged by the problems of collective action. So if the House shuffles awkwardly in the direction of impeachment proceedings, maybe shuffling is the best it can manage. And three months after the release of the Mueller report, any movement toward seriously considering impeachment is both welcome and long overdue.
Then again, the confusion of the press conference stems in part from the sheer strangeness of the prize the Judiciary Committee has invoked impeachment in order to obtain: that is, the grand-jury material. The odds in court are uncertain, and the redacted material makes up a minuscule portion of a report that, as Democrats have emphasized again and again, is profoundly unflattering to the president. Its hard to imagine what kind of smoking gun could be hidden behind redactions. Anyway, the evidence table is already littered with exhibit after damning exhibit. At best, the grand-jury material is like the Maltese Falcon: the desired object that has no real significance, but moves the plot forward. At worst, its another way for the House to kick the can on presidential accountability down the road.
In watching Trumps rage alongside what looks like Democratic dithering, what comes to mind is an unflattering line from the poet William Butler Yeats: The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity. The only hope is that the House will continue to slouch toward impeachment."
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/07/house-democrats-slouch-toward-impeachment/594940/
murielm99
(30,730 posts)The Democrats are moving toward impeachment in an intelligent and deliberate manner.
Criticize our corrupt so-called leader, not those trying to save democracy.
Faux pas
(14,657 posts)Poiuyt
(18,122 posts)I appreciate what Nancy Pelosi is doingwaiting until the case is as strong as possible. There are a lot of crimes that Mueller didn't investigate such as his personal and business dealings, campaign finance violations, etc. These need to be included too.
But damn, they are moving slowly and it appears without focus. I don't see the necessity of investigating in order to investigate. Just start a formal impeachment investigation, and the country (aside from the 35% deplorables) will pay attention to the gravitas of the matter.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)uponit7771
(90,329 posts)emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,568 posts)Transcripts of Don McGahn's testimony.
This ain't no Maltese Falcon Maguffin.