General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVery disturbing, from Slate "How William Barr Won"
At every step in the investigation, the attorney general used Muellers ethics against him.
By WILLIAM SALETAN
JULY 26, 201911:42 AM
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/07/mueller-hearing-william-barr-trump-investigation-winner.html
Why is President Donald Trump getting away with obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation? There are many answers: Republican corruption, Democratic incompetence, and the inability of Robert Mueller, the former special counsel, to prove an underlying crime. But one more reason is that Mueller has been outmaneuvered and betrayed by the man Trump appointed to end the investigation: Attorney General William Barr. Mueller has bent over backward to be fair to Trump. Barr, choosing loyalty to Trump over loyalty to country, has ruthlessly protected the president.
Testifying on Wednesday before two House committees, Mueller shied away from questions about impeachment. His job, he explained, was to investigate the facts and deliver a report to the attorney general. Anything else was beyond his purview. Democrats asked Mueller whether Trump campaign officials had betrayed their country when they communicated with WikiLeaks about Democratic emails hacked by Russia. They asked whether Americans should be concerned that three senior Trump advisers had eagerly sought a foreign adversarys help to win elections. Mueller refused to say.
The former special counsel also refused to draw factual conclusions. Didnt his report show that Trump had lied about a lucrative construction project in Moscow? Didnt Trumps dangling of pardons discourage witnesses from cooperating with the investigation? Mueller declined to answer. He wouldnt affirm even the most obvious truth: that Russias election interference affected some peoples voting decisions. When Democrats tried to spin the evidence, Mueller shot them down. Responding to one lawmakers comment that sanctions relief was discussed at the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, Mueller retorted: Yes, but it was not a main subject.
Again and again, Democrats recited facts from Muellers report, hoping he would endorse their conclusions. Didnt his findings about the Trump Tower meeting add up to a conspiracy? Didnt Trumps pressure on thenAttorney General Jeff Sessions to abort the investigation in 2017and on thenWhite House counsel Don McGahn to write a false witness statement in 2018prove obstruction of justice? Each time, Mueller rejected the political script, stipulating that his affirmation of the cited facts didnt mean he agreed with the lawmakers characterizations.
Muellers integrity makes him a sterling investigator but a lousy political combatant. On March 22, he submitted his 448-page report to Barr, laying out evidence that Trump had obstructed justice but declining to state that conclusion. Barr responded by hijacking the report. Instead of digesting it or releasing the summaries Mueller had drafted for public release, the attorney general issued a letter on March 24 declaring, without explanation, that the evidence was not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
snip
last part
And what is Muellers reward for these scruples? During his testimony, Republicans accused him of bias against Trump. Then, at a press conference afterward, they crowed that Mueller had trashed the Democrats talking points against the president. In the hearings, Democrats had laid out every possibility they could for obstruction, said Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. And Mr. Mueller looked at em and said
I dont agree with your theory. That should tell you a lot right there.
It certainly does. It explains, to a large extent, why Trump is off the hook. Barr is playing politics, and Mueller isnt. Even a Bronze Star Marine can be fragged.
Read it all...so pissed off......
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)There have been more negative articles and corporate media going on. Meanwhile, Democrats are positive and moving forward.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)able to move forward. But....thanks for playing along.
Reading....learning...it's fundamental.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)2015/16 Redux. Is this the sequel?
blm
(113,044 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the real crime -- working, encouraging Russians. In his report, he pretty mush let trump and the campaign completely off the hook for conspiracy, collusion, cooperation, whatever you want to call it.
In afternoon, he either said, or answered, "Yes" to several questions about trump being unethical, immoral, unpatriotic, and pretty darn close to criminal.
As far as Obstruction, pretty much during both hearings, he was saying -- "Look, do I have to spell it out for you, Congress has to decide what to do with Obstruction."
He pretty much wimped out with his Report, but he was much less wimpy in the afternoon. Maybe he was just getting tired of the whole thing.
In any event, just happy I'm not hearing some ignorant media talking head using the term "Four Corners of the Report," over and over, trying to sound like an insider.
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)the counter intelligence part of the FBI. Those are the ones who look into treasonous acts and collaborating with a foreign group that is hostile to the United States.
He knew the answers to some of it, but can't say anything as it's an ongoing investigation.