Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 09:00 PM Jul 2019

Very disturbing, from Slate "How William Barr Won"

At every step in the investigation, the attorney general used Mueller’s ethics against him.
By WILLIAM SALETAN

JULY 26, 201911:42 AM

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/07/mueller-hearing-william-barr-trump-investigation-winner.html

Why is President Donald Trump getting away with obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation? There are many answers: Republican corruption, Democratic incompetence, and the inability of Robert Mueller, the former special counsel, to prove an underlying crime. But one more reason is that Mueller has been outmaneuvered and betrayed by the man Trump appointed to end the investigation: Attorney General William Barr. Mueller has bent over backward to be fair to Trump. Barr, choosing loyalty to Trump over loyalty to country, has ruthlessly protected the president.

Testifying on Wednesday before two House committees, Mueller shied away from questions about impeachment. His job, he explained, was to investigate the facts and deliver a report to the attorney general. Anything else was beyond his purview. Democrats asked Mueller whether Trump campaign officials had betrayed their country when they communicated with WikiLeaks about Democratic emails hacked by Russia. They asked whether Americans should be concerned that three senior Trump advisers had “eagerly sought a foreign adversary’s help to win elections.” Mueller refused to say.

The former special counsel also refused to draw factual conclusions. Didn’t his report show that Trump had lied about a lucrative construction project in Moscow? Didn’t Trump’s dangling of pardons discourage witnesses from cooperating with the investigation? Mueller declined to answer. He wouldn’t affirm even the most obvious truth: that Russia’s election interference affected some people’s voting decisions. When Democrats tried to spin the evidence, Mueller shot them down. Responding to one lawmaker’s comment that “sanctions relief was discussed” at the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, Mueller retorted: “Yes, but it was not a main subject.”

Again and again, Democrats recited facts from Mueller’s report, hoping he would endorse their conclusions. Didn’t his findings about the Trump Tower meeting add up to a conspiracy? Didn’t Trump’s pressure on then–Attorney General Jeff Sessions to abort the investigation in 2017—and on then–White House counsel Don McGahn to write a false witness statement in 2018—prove obstruction of justice? Each time, Mueller rejected the political script, stipulating that his affirmation of the cited facts didn’t mean he agreed with the lawmakers’ characterizations.

Mueller’s integrity makes him a sterling investigator but a lousy political combatant. On March 22, he submitted his 448-page report to Barr, laying out evidence that Trump had obstructed justice but declining to state that conclusion. Barr responded by hijacking the report. Instead of digesting it or releasing the summaries Mueller had drafted for public release, the attorney general issued a letter on March 24 declaring, without explanation, that the evidence was “not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.”


snip

last part

And what is Mueller’s reward for these scruples? During his testimony, Republicans accused him of bias against Trump. Then, at a press conference afterward, they crowed that Mueller had trashed the Democrats’ talking points against the president. In the hearings, Democrats had “laid out every possibility they could for obstruction,” said Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. “And Mr. Mueller looked at ’em and said … ‘I don’t agree with your theory.’ That should tell you a lot right there.”

It certainly does. It explains, to a large extent, why Trump is off the hook. Barr is playing politics, and Mueller isn’t. Even a Bronze Star Marine can be fragged.


Read it all...so pissed off......

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very disturbing, from Slate "How William Barr Won" (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Jul 2019 OP
Oh please. . . . Iliyah Jul 2019 #1
We can walk and chew gum at the same time too. And we have to understand what is happening to be NRaleighLiberal Jul 2019 #3
The M$M is doing it AGAIN! BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #5
Mulla Enchanted. Cursed to do what he is told. blm Jul 2019 #2
Actually, in the afternoon session, Mueller opened up a lot, not only on Obstruction, but also Hoyt Jul 2019 #4
Sorry. Not buying it. Cartaphelius Jul 2019 #6
Many things he was restricted from commenting on because it's in shraby Jul 2019 #7

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
1. Oh please. . . .
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 09:04 PM
Jul 2019

There have been more negative articles and corporate media going on. Meanwhile, Democrats are positive and moving forward.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
3. We can walk and chew gum at the same time too. And we have to understand what is happening to be
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 09:35 PM
Jul 2019

able to move forward. But....thanks for playing along.

Reading....learning...it's fundamental.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Actually, in the afternoon session, Mueller opened up a lot, not only on Obstruction, but also
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 09:51 PM
Jul 2019

the real crime -- working, encouraging Russians. In his report, he pretty mush let trump and the campaign completely off the hook for conspiracy, collusion, cooperation, whatever you want to call it.

In afternoon, he either said, or answered, "Yes" to several questions about trump being unethical, immoral, unpatriotic, and pretty darn close to criminal.

As far as Obstruction, pretty much during both hearings, he was saying -- "Look, do I have to spell it out for you, Congress has to decide what to do with Obstruction."


He pretty much wimped out with his Report, but he was much less wimpy in the afternoon. Maybe he was just getting tired of the whole thing.

In any event, just happy I'm not hearing some ignorant media talking head using the term "Four Corners of the Report," over and over, trying to sound like an insider.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
7. Many things he was restricted from commenting on because it's in
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 10:35 PM
Jul 2019

the counter intelligence part of the FBI. Those are the ones who look into treasonous acts and collaborating with a foreign group that is hostile to the United States.

He knew the answers to some of it, but can't say anything as it's an ongoing investigation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Very disturbing, from Sla...