Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 10:18 PM Aug 2019

The "well regulated" part of the 2A

Would this be an accurate statement to summarize without getting all gun wonky?

There is absolutely no reason to be selling rounds and weapons of war to civilians.

Or would that be accurately countered with, "they aren't weapons of war".

I'm trying to distill this down.
So frustrating.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The "well regulated" part of the 2A (Original Post) SHRED Aug 2019 OP
SAD elleng Aug 2019 #1
the "well regulated" part should at least open the door to reasonable regulation. rampartc Aug 2019 #2
Number of guns United States of America 393,347,000 YOHABLO Aug 2019 #3
It means well trained and drilled NutmegYankee Aug 2019 #4
"well-regulated" modifies the word militia in the 2nd amendment. aikoaiko Aug 2019 #5
"Weapons of war" aren't generally available to civilians. X_Digger Aug 2019 #6
Even under the Scalia written Heller decision, GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #7
Good point SHRED Aug 2019 #8

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
4. It means well trained and drilled
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 10:44 PM
Aug 2019

Many early Revolutionary war battles went badly because poorly skilled militia were up against professional soldiers. It wasn't until we got Baron Friedrich von Steuben that the Continental army was able to match the soldiers of Great Britain. The reason it says "militia" is the founders considered standing armies to be detrimental to freedom, such that the army would be composed of state trained militias if it needed to be called up. This of course was obsolete after the Napoleonic wars, where it was demonstrated that professional armies were a necessity.

The well regulated provision today is maintained via the National Guard, which is the modern state militia.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
5. "well-regulated" modifies the word militia in the 2nd amendment.
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 11:15 PM
Aug 2019


Not arms or the people. There is also a dispute as to the meaning of well-regulated in the context of militia (i.e., well outfitted and well trained versus restricted by law/rules).

Nevertheless, we can still have discussion about how we can regulate (restrict by law and rules) firearms.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
6. "Weapons of war" aren't generally available to civilians.
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 11:19 PM
Aug 2019

Full auto machine guns have been effectively banned since 1986.

No army uses semi-auto weapons.

If you're talking about a certain caliber, then hunting rifles use the same (or larger) rounds.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
7. Even under the Scalia written Heller decision,
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 11:22 PM
Aug 2019

Guns can be highly regulated. Including high capacity rifles like those used it almost every mass murder.

The problem is not the 2nd amendment. It’s lack of political will. Hell, even the Democratic Party platform upholds Americans right to own firearms. But also calls for reasonable regulation. Including an assault weapons ban.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "well regulated" part...