Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Sun Aug 4, 2019, 10:08 AM Aug 2019

Intent to incite violence. But let's argue about impeachment??

there’s this from a few months ago.

Trump asks Florida rally crowd: "How do you stop these people" from crossing the border?

"Shoot them!" a rally attendee shouts out.

Trump: "That's only in the panhandle you can get away with that stuff. Only in the panhandle."





2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Intent to incite violence. But let's argue about impeachment?? (Original Post) kpete Aug 2019 OP
Let's all call it what it is. femmocrat Aug 2019 #1
Neo-Nazi murderers lark Aug 2019 #2

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
1. Let's all call it what it is.
Sun Aug 4, 2019, 10:12 AM
Aug 2019

It is incitement. It’s a crime. Impeach his privileged @ss now. By whatever legal means, he has to go.

Watching Cory Booker who is putting the blame directly on trump. (on MSNBC). I asked Google, and this is what I found:

Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Intent to incite violence...