General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMass shootings overblown? Neil deGrasse Tyson suggests that's the case...
What do you think about this?
Link to tweet
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)But none of those other things happen to a couple dozen innocent children on a normal school day.
Polybius
(15,381 posts)With that being said, of course I support gun-control to bring the numbers of the shootings down.
graeme_macquarrie
(29 posts)Kablooie
(18,625 posts)These shootings are murders and the government does nothing to minimize them.
VMA131Marine
(4,138 posts)They are not accidents
Kablooie
(18,625 posts)I'm sure most hope the error will go undetected without negative consequences.
Also there are laws and procedures designed to prevent medical errors.
VMA131Marine
(4,138 posts)Imagine if there were 500 airline passenger deaths per day due to pilot mistakes. Nobody would ever get on an airplane!
The fact that there are so few airline passenger deaths every year is because there is an agency, the NTSB, dedicated to understanding what went wrong in a crash and proposing measures to prevent similar chains of events from occurring.
The medical profession could easily implement the same kind of thing. To say that the doctors hope the mistakes go unnoticed is completely unacceptable. That would be one big reason why there are 500 deaths per day due to medical errors. It's not enough, in the medical profession, to intend not to harm. Doctors and all medical staff need to be proactive about preventing mistakes or catching them early before any harm is done.
Response to VMA131Marine (Reply #35)
Post removed
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)And unless and until people become infallible and eliminate human error from our existence, comparing medical errors with intentional, malicious mass murder is a non-starter.
CharleyDog
(757 posts)"patriotic." Our government wants MORE GUNS. Laws are passed to make shootings "stand your ground" and no permits, no checks at all for a "guns everywhere" policy. More guns is always the answer.
And what do you know? The prime government leader, the man with all the power will do nothing, and nothing will be done, again, so we can all tune in to watch the body bags.
(When we don't enact laws to limit guns, the only answer will be for more militarization of American life: more hired guns to monitor our life at the grocery store, the mall, the schools... I predict that will be the NRA/Republican answer. The other answer will be war, more war, patriotic war, because that will really tie the Democrats hands.)
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)tinrobot
(10,894 posts)We do have one that donates to Republicans to promote guns.
Archae
(46,317 posts)"Grab the ratings, get the headlines, we'll stick to the facts later..."
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... accidents and murder, etc among worlds 3rd largest populated country is horrible but not different.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Please, if thata your interpretation, do more consideration before speaking (offer me a 'but whatabout what he...' that's a nonstarter)
eleny
(46,166 posts)dalton99a
(81,450 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)johnp3907
(3,730 posts)Cartoonist
(7,315 posts)We are doing what we can to reduce the others. We aren't doing anything to stop gun deaths.
Have you gotten your flu shot, Neil?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)dalton99a
(81,450 posts)graeme_macquarrie
(29 posts)The Dayton shooter killed his sister and her boyfriend outside that club. I don't think Drumpf whispered in his ear on that one. There may be other things in play on that one. We will need to see what facts surface.
No doubt the El Paso shooter was a white Nationalist, just like many before him- from the KKK in the first half of last century to Timothy McVeigh. But the San Bernadino and Pulse shootings had nothing to do with White Nationalist/Supremacy movements.
The common factor most of these shootings have in common is radicalized males, that in my opinion are mentally ill and delusional.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... both of those statements are facts not in dispute.
graeme_macquarrie
(29 posts)Some one that posted they would happily vote for Elizabeth Warren;
Posted "Vote Blue for God's Sake" on November 2, 2018;
Posted "this is bad" in response to the November 2016 presidential election results;
Posted "F*uck John McCain" on the day he died;
Posted that he wanted Socialism and wasn't "waiting around for it";
Posted "Kill Every Fascist" in response to an article on a rally on the Charlottesville anniversary;
The Green County Board of Elections lists his party affiliation as "Dem".
Those facts are not in dispute either.
I stated that while I believed the El Paso mass shooting was white Nationalist inspired, I was waiting on more facts on this guy. Something didn't smell right.
Sometimes numbers are just anomalies. You don't have information yet on those wounded by this maniac. It could bear out your contention or not.
In any case it does not appear he was radicalized by the Talking Yam.
https://heavy.com/news/2019/08/connor-betts-twitter-politics-social-media/
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... equivalence is noted.
graeme_macquarrie
(29 posts)I never said this individual was radicalized or incited by any one left or right. I said that the odds that he was mentally ill were very high, and it was unlikely, given his past statements, that he was committing a racial motivated hate crime incited by the comments of President Cheeto.
The false equivalence is yours my friend- equating the race of people murdered as proof that this was a racially motivated hate crime.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... people usually don't do that even if they're sick out of their heads unless its racially motivated.
OK, I'll wait ... but the way it looks on its face is racially motivated and its common place for he media and the government to hold out calling something a hate crime if a white shooter terrorist is involved.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)No civilian needs that kind of weapon.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)It's mentally ill to be one of these un-American fascist republicans to begin with.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)targetpractice
(4,919 posts)And media circuses are aggravating and not entertaining in the least.
Hav
(5,969 posts)The thing is, when all the other things happen, for most we try to find the reason for it in order to fix it (medical errors, car accidents if there were mechanical errors). We don't just acknowledge deaths caused by the flu with thoughts and prayers, we try to do something to save lifes instead.
There are things that just happen, others are so unnecessary and could be addressed to at least diminish the consequences. Saying to look over there is a distraction that doesn't help to address the problem or make it better.
Retrograde
(10,133 posts)live love laugh
(13,100 posts)🙄
BlueTsunami2018
(3,490 posts)They love him all of a sudden.
lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)Maybe he lives in an alternate universe.
rustysgurl
(1,040 posts)... and attempting to compare apples to apples, sure, I get it.
But these aren't apples to apples. Some of your numbers, Neil, are accidents. Some are natural illness. Some are due to mental illness. Seriously? You're going to attempt to compare those to the innocents mowed down yesterday (and all the others killed in mass shootings)?
Neil, stop and think for a moment. You are a smart man. Knowledge is power. Being smart also assumes you will use your knowledge intelligently. Big fail here, sir.
delisen
(6,042 posts)we investigate, we educate, we draw conclusions, we regulate, we take reasonable actions to mitigate.
In each of the above we run up against people who don't want to do what is necessary to save lives----
but we don't for example stop developing flu vaccines because people die from other events.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)0 people would have been mass murdered in White Supremacist Right Wing domestic terrorist attacks yesterday if Trump didn't incite them
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)triron
(21,995 posts)problem. If fact it can be unnecessarily distracting.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,411 posts)homicide numbers are primarily gun related.... and on a per day basis. We live in a gun crazed violent society, despite all our collective economic wealth.
flotsam
(3,268 posts)None of your other causes inhibit the enjoyment of the inherent right to enjoy your life in public places without fear. How do you build a working system of government when people are to afraid to exercise " the right of the people peaceably to assemble"? Shouldn't the 1st amendment trump(ahem) the 2nd?
Srkdqltr
(6,271 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)and mass shootings are tragic, but they need to be addressed in context of all threats.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)graeme_macquarrie
(29 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)...all semi-autos wont change that.
Lucid Dreamer
(584 posts)TN study 2016-17 suicide distribution
63.3% Firearms
18.5% Suffocation
13.1% Poison
5.1% Other
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)spanone
(135,819 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)What point is he trying to make? That these mass murders shouldn't be made into such big a deal?
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(9,975 posts)Vinca
(50,261 posts)draw attention to 2 of the other things he noted: suicide and homicide via handgun. That said, the time for talking is over. Our "brave" politicians need to step up to the plate and do what is right.
hunter
(38,310 posts)We don't allow just anyone to practice medicine, we require prescriptions for certain medicines and don't allow some medicines to be prescribed at all, and we require new cars to meet certain safety standards. We enforce traffic laws and build roads and highways to minimize certain kinds of accidents
Regulations are imperfect, and not always appropriate or effective, but there's no reason guns should be exempt.
If someone was going around promoting suicide or the spread of flu germs or driving on the wrong side of the road they'd be rightfully regarded as dangerous.
LudwigPastorius
(9,136 posts)nobody wants to hear that shit right now.
Fuck off, Neal. Sometimes it takes a little emotion (namely disgust, outrage, and most importantly, empathy) to overcome the bought-and-paid-for laws and policies that lead to crimes like this.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He's showing an extreme lack of compassion and situational awareness in this case.
You aren't helping, Neal. This is not the time.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)The media and gun control advocates have a vested interest in making a spectacle of these tragedies.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Only in the case of handgun violence is a person targeted to be murdered. There is an enormous significance in that fact. There is no reason to have guns that shoot more than 6 bullets in society, in a battlefield, yes, but not in society. A person that can't take down a dangerous home invader or violent attacker with 6 or less rounds should get their asses to a gun range and practice.
Response to pintobean (Reply #42)
Post removed
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)How many of those 250 suicides are committed with a firearm?
What a stupid, tone-deaf thing for Tyson to say.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)ourselves to.
Mass murder is not.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Even as far as a percentage of murders committed with guns go, the shootings that happened yesterday are a small percentage.
These shootings touch us more than the shootings that happen every single day because they're dramatic. They're dramatic because a whole bunch of people get murdered at one time. We've come to accept the slow drip of murders that are committed with guns every single day.
Whenever one of these types of shootings is committed with an 'assualt' rifle, there are a lot of calls to ban 'assault' rifles.....but when one of them is committed by someone using a hand gun or shotgun..not so much. That's always puzzled me.
If the goal is to save lives, and if we're assuming we can do that by banning certain sorts of guns....why in the heck are we concentrating on 'assault' weapons, or any kind of rifle? Shouldn't we be trying to get rid of the actual kind of gun that kills the most people?
Handguns kill far more people than any kind of rifle. It's not even close.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)ooky
(8,922 posts)addressing the root cause. Nobody needs an assault weapon for personal use. Hand guns are okay for protection at home, but not needed in public. It should be a felony to be caught with a hand gun in public, or to be caught with an assault weapon anywhere, if we want to start fixing the problem. We don't need society running around with all these guns. This country needs a paradigm shift and get tough policies on guns if we ever want to stop the killing.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)No these shootings are hopefully wake up call to the right-wing fascist that are a major threat to our country.
The Republicans hate America.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)How would these shootings be a wake up call to the fascists?
Seems, if anything, they would be wake up calls to the rest of us.
However, I doubt they will really wake anyone up. The mass shootings that weren't committed by right-wingers haven't seemed to really cause us to get anything done, so I doubt the ones committed by right wing nuts will either.
Jim__
(14,074 posts)People are born, get sick, and die every day. I wish everyone could live forever, or at least to the point where they've had enough of life. That's not the way it is, and there's not a whole lot we can do about that in the short term.
We can do something about people with military-type weapons walking into public spaces and murdering innocent people.
Neil deGrasse Tyson needs to apply some context to his numbers.
Oneironaut
(5,492 posts)enough coverage.
skypilot
(8,853 posts)...IF that is what he meant he should have been able to say it as succinctly as you did. But the fact is that all of those tragic things he listed DO get coverage if they happen in significant numbers over a relatively short period of time. Mass shootings do a lot of damage in a very short time.
Frankly, his reasoning here is just as shitty as that of those 2nd Amendment advocates who think that these shootings is just something we have to live with in order to enjoy our "freedom" under that amendment.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)Everyman Jackal
(271 posts)And how many of those 300 received a flu shot?
Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)could be gone, or at least greatly diminished if we had decent gun laws!
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)John Fante
(3,479 posts)without traffic laws, flu vaccines, suicide prevention hotlines, etc. Imagine if we took the "thoughts and prayers" route in every one of these areas?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)One of the best twitter responses on that thread below:
Rekalty
@Rekalty
·
Replying to
@neiltyson
We're working to prevent medical errors.
We're working to prevent the flu.
We're working to prevent suicide.
We're working to prevent car accident.
We're doing fuck all about mass shootings.
Spot the difference, Neil.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)There are many fewer traffic fatalities now.
treestar
(82,383 posts)A second. Amendment right to exist with no attempt at a cure ? Who thinks nothing can
Prevent traffic accidents or make them less damaging ?
grumpyduck
(6,232 posts)that's total bullshit. Apples and oranges. Mass shootings are premeditated criminal or terrorist acts.
Yes they're played up (so to speak) by the MSM because that's what they do, but you don't diminish them because the numbers are lower.
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)yardwork
(61,588 posts)Just because bad things happen doesn't mean we shouldn't try to prevent them.
pwb
(11,261 posts).
Kid Berwyn
(14,876 posts)Fuck you!
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,876 posts)All are irreplaceable.
How he could compare those lost to accident or disease or malpractice with those taken by mass murder is beyond my understanding.
He is an intelligent man. I hope he realizes he made a mistake. There is no rationalizing violence.
Initech
(100,063 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)But mass shootings are news the way a major airplane crash is news even though, as he posted, 200 people a day die from car accidents. People freak out about a plane crash (and the last one in this country with fatalities was in February, 2009) and pay no attention to the many who die in cars every day.
I don't want to minimize the horror of these mass murders, but statistically speaking, hardly anyone is likely to die this way. Far, far more likely to die from any of the other ways he listed.
That said, I'm in favor of outright gun confiscation.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)"I don't want to minimize the horror of these mass murders" But you did. None of those things you said have nothing to do with the mass shooting. By posting airplane crashes and other tragedies has no connection whatsoever.
It's a right-wing attempt to minimize. The terrorist right-winger is just like all the other un-American right-wingers.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)I guess that was blown all out of proportion too.
How do the latest mass shooting fatalities stack up against the number of measles fatalities in this country over the past 6 months? Does he think we're making too much of a fuss about unvaccinated kids too?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I still dont understand why only 9/11 first responders get federal assistance, and the vast majority of first responders injured in the line of duty on any other day of the year in any other place can just drop dead as far as were concerned.
treestar
(82,383 posts)As part of life. The mass shootings dont seem that way.
VOX
(22,976 posts)And it does not factor in the negative impact on each victims circle of family, friends, fellow students, work colleagues, and close acquaintances. Each death affects dozens, possibly even hundreds of other people.
As its worded, his tweet is ready-rolled cut-and-paste content for RWers.
Takket
(21,557 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Heartstrings
(7,349 posts)Thoughts and prayers for your sexual assault victims!
raccoon
(31,110 posts)Alpeduez21
(1,751 posts)Medical error fatalities due to the inflammation of racism by the president?
Were the cases of flu due to the negligence of repuke politicians to line their coffers with NRA/Russia money?
Were the 250 suicides caused by the lies that Sandy Hook was a hoax?
Did 200 car accidents happen b/c the second amendment guarantees hot headed white males get to use cars?
40 to handguns? kind of proves the point of the emotional response doesn't it?
Often our snarkiness responds more to deluded smugness than to purposeful murder.
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)when some get accused of sexual harassment tend to take a right wing turn. Like Louis CK...
skypilot
(8,853 posts)If he's douchey enough to post something like this (and this soon after the event) maybe I should take a closer look at this guy.
I used to love Louis CK too but now not so much.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)BootinUp
(47,139 posts)DFW
(54,341 posts)Hospital errors, the flu, and car accidents are not intentional, suicides are intentional, but not directed at random victims, and nor are most hand gun killings.
Just about all deaths and injuries in these mass shootings are people whose lives are suddenly destroyed at random at the whim and mercy of a nut case they had never met, with whom they had no quarrel.
If THAT doesnt set these victims apart, well who am I to argue with statistics?
femmedem
(8,201 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 5, 2019, 07:28 AM - Edit history (1)
according to the Equal Justice Initiative. Should we not get emotional about that? Even though far more people died of the flu during those same years? Or because more people are dying per year now in mass shootings?
The difference between these white supremacist shootings and flu, suicide, and even homicides is that they are terrorism, designed to instill fear and terror extending far beyond the direct victims. Surely Neil deGrasse Tyson understands that the growing threat of lethal white supremacist hatred is more horrifying than mistakes, accidents or the flu?
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)It will only be 1 lost person.
melman
(7,681 posts)Talitha
(6,581 posts)Pull your head out of your ass and grow a heart, ffs!
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)Our cars are safety featured like crazy.
We give flu shots.
We have a LOT of suicide prevention programs.
skypilot
(8,853 posts)I think that this kind of fixation on trying to have impeccable logic, math, and statistics is turning people into cold, heartless assholes.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)The Nazi-Republicans are trying to okay the deaths of these people. I encountered the Sandy hook deniers at the same time. These people are a pos.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)How many people have the flu each day compared to how many die.
How may auto accidents result in injury and death compared to the number of such accidents?
How many die due to medical accidents compared to the number of such accidents?
How many suicidal people attempt suicide each day compared to the number successful?
Then how many are murdered and injured by How Many assault weapon attacks?
Goodheart
(5,318 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)We lose a lot of people to all kinds of things, but because they happen one at a time, we lower the emphasis we put on them. We did that with the deaths on 9/11, also.
However, others make good points about what we are trying to prevent, versus what we do not try to prevent. Of course, that assumes that new laws will be effective in preventing what we attempt to prevent.
Removing some guns from our society (you cannot possibly get rid of them all) simply makes the remaining guns more expensive, and thus, more valuable.
58Sunliner
(4,381 posts)The rest are sad facts of life that while possibly traumatic, are known risks of living. I have PTSD from a car wreck, but I've also coped with PTSD from a violent, life threatening assault and it was 20 times worse and it was not easy to climb out of that black hole. The wreckage took years to recover from. I saw a segment of 60 minutes and the two parents who lost a daughter to the guy who shot up the movie theater talked about the trajectory of their experience. Their surviving son still gets threats. Just look at the Sandy Hook parents and what they have been through. Sorry Neal-way off base.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)The peerblindness of spectacle we have.
Is roasted for his trouble
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)None of those things he said has anything to do with what happen.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)And hes obviously correct. Thank you for being a prime example.
dlk
(11,549 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)You're in greater danger objectively of being crushed by a vending machine. It doesn't mean we shouldn't try to fix the problem.
Personally I find it really strange that every category of crime is at historic lows except shooting a shitload of strangers in a public space.
True Dough
(17,301 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)by now, if you have been watching a long time, some one is going to gallop out from under his rock to try to drag that statement to a forum to try to use to attrack other racists to attack the distinguished (uppity, in some eyes, apparently) person.
It ALWAYS happens, and Neil deGrasse Tyson has been attacked relentlessly by people posing as Democrats over the years. There are always fellow "great minds" desperate to launch, in their finest imitations of thoughtful commentary, their reasons that some man/woman of color is not nearly as "smart" as he/she thinks, and how much he or she sucks.
This tactic doesn't fool anyone, everyone sees it for what it is.
Nel deGrasse has every right in the world to make statements to whomever is interviewing him, or reading his comments. He continues to be incredibly intelligent, awakened, well-intentioned, and amazingly socially aware. I appreciate his comment "Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data," and I have no doubt at all he does NOT support every vicious clown in the country having his/her own armory at home.
Think twice, post once.
True Dough
(17,301 posts)I'm going to make it crystal clear, after reading your post, that I most certainly am not "galloping out from under my rock" or attempting to "attract other racists" (I'm not a racist myself).
Just in case the insinuation in your post is directed at me, you'll notice that I pass no judgement in this thread. I simply asked other DUers to chime in with their thoughts on NDT's tweet. The reason I did that is because I have long admired Neil's intellect. However, when I read his tweet, it created some cognitive dissonance for me. Here's this individual whom I respect stating something that comes across as flawed and rather callous.
I would have shared the tweet on this forum if it came from Jon Stewart or Elizabeth Warren, prominent WHITE people whom I also admire.
It seems to me that your closing advice, "Think twice, post once," is something NDT should have followed before sharing this particular tweet with the public.
madville
(7,408 posts)Mostly affecting people of color. Barely gets a mention in the national media. Just about every weekend in Chicago is at the mass shooting numbers level and yet most don't talk about it.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)While mass shooters with black rifles get by far the most attention, the daily handgun carnage on our city streets is the true problem we should be addressing first.
misanthrope
(7,411 posts)All of Sunday night, CNN has preempted its scheduled programming and run all-capital "headlines" of "BREAKING NEWS" across its screen for a pair of stories that are 24 hours old.
Rainbow Droid
(722 posts)And don't twist his words and infer something that isn't there. Not a good look.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)It's the evil nature of the act that is so disturbing. It's the terror that's involved. Statistically mass shootings are rare, but their impact is way larger.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Also I think a lot of people live in fear of being mowed down in the mall or a movie theater when it's much more dangerous to drive to them. If we're living in fear then terrorism is working.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)we are doing or have done many things to prevent them. We can't do it 100% but we can work on it with reason, logic, information and research.
Medical errors occur because, well, people are people. But look how far we have come from the days when surgeons did not even know to wash their hands.
The flu used to kill many more people and vaccines are developed for many strains of flu.
Suicide is probably the hardest to prevent, but there are medications that can help some people and there are many groups out there opening up to say "we are here" for those who find themselves at a low point.
The cars we have today seem majorly better as far as surviving accidents and we have mandated seat belt use and have engineered amazing child restraint seats.
The last one...well, our society has far to go in this area. I would like to see a time when we have evolved past killer instincts and "desires". Most of us seem to be there, but many don't seem to go along.
I think the issue of regulating guns seems to fit well with this list. We can see where changes have happened with each of these examples. With gun use, we have almost done nothing since the days when the 2nd amendment was written.
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Look at what has been made LAW for cars over the decades,look at how cars are now able to crumple in a wreck instead of being built like a tank which didn't work.
Now just WHAT has Gov done to prevent these WHITE GUY mass MURDERS?? NOTHING................
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)for extermination was no big deal either?
Context matters.
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)For stating what should be obvious to most people.....
"Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data"
But usually is not.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Cars are machines created with the purpose of making it easier for people to get from one place to another. They were not created with the point of killing things. On the other hand, that's the only purpose as to the existence of guns.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)Every month or so, more people are murdered with handguns than are shot with rifles over the course of a full year.
AWBs are emotionally appealing, but the cold numbers say we should be focusing 100% on handguns first.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Tyson needs to stick to what he knows.
elocs
(22,566 posts)He destroyed the message he was trying to make.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)True Dough
(17,301 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)aidbo
(2,328 posts)The shootings were less than 13 hours apart.
Hes talking about averages of course
So using his numbers in 13 hours you get:
135 deaths due to medical errors.
81 to the flu.
68 to suicide.
54 to car accidents.
11 to homicide via handgun.
And 34 in these two terroristic mass shootings. To me they dont seem so insignificant now.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)The medical error deaths number seems really high. I found this article about them.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-medical-errors-really-the-third-most-common-cause-of-death-in-the-u-s-2019-edition/
And as for flu deaths, according to this article, (https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/) 80000 people died from the flu in 2017, but:
In recent years, flu-related deaths have ranged from about 12,000 to in the worst year 56,000, according to the CDC.