General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf every law considered about guns was in force the past 5 years, 10 years
20 years, how many of these attacks would have been avoided?
5%?
10%?
Surely no more than that, prove me wrong, please.
If you cant, you DO know what that means, right?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)that they need these guns to protect from a tyrannical government?
In my view, the gun debate is mainly driven by one side's obvious fear of a non-white majority America.
underpants
(182,720 posts)First, the idea that an individual can out gun a federal operation is indeed fantasy. They have all kinds of BOOM BOOM to reach out and touch someone with.
Second, and this was my point, can anyone provide one example ONE where this kind of firepower and/or rate of fire has ever been used by someone to protect themselves or their family or possessions against bad guys? One example?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And my view is also that this fantasy is also linked to the slaveowners fear of a rebellion by the slaves.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Some of these idiots believe THEY should have the exact same weapons as the Federal Government. I kid you not.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)LonePirate
(13,412 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)would accept their own form of political tyranny. In my view, what they really fear is a loss of power and privilege.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)state and he wanted to own one BECAUSE people he knew in other states could
Good guy, votes Democratic.
sigh
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)so...
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)that their own Government is the enemy?