Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TygrBright

(20,755 posts)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 06:34 PM Aug 2019

Easy. Not Expensive. Certain to Ultimately Help Decrease Gun Casualties.

But does anyone want to make book on whether Moscow Mitch and/or President Windrip will do it?

It requires no earth-shaking changes to any gun laws or Constitutional Amendments. Takes no ones firearms away. Imposes no restrictions or regulations.

Yes, it takes some investment- at the moment, $50 million. In Federal budget terms, that's not even pocket change, it's pocket lint.

Yes, it would need more eventually. But not a lot more. We're not talking build-a-military-aircraft costs here, or even fund-a-stupid-ass-wall.

And in the long run, it might be the most effective path to reducing the casualties connected to mass shooting incidents.

It's really, really simple:

Let the CDC research gun violence.

Some of you are saying "Wait, what? Don't they already?"

ummmm.... no. Not since 1996 when the NRA bought "The Dickey Amendment" to that year's omnibus spending bill, officially requiring that "none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) may be used to advocate or promote gun control."

The NRA was well aware that any credible research or systematic information gathering about gun violence would end up fueling calls for firearms regulation. So we couldn't have any of that.

Now the House of Representatives has passed an extremely modest $50 million allocation-- $25 million to the CDC, $25 million to the National Institutes of Health-- for the explicit purpose of researching how to save lives by researching how to reduce gun-related suicides, the links between domestic violence and gun violence, what types of safe storage are effective, and identifying risk factors involved in gun purchases that might end up being used for murder.

Will Moscow Mitch allow it through the Senate?

Will President Windrip sign it?

Any takers?

pessimistically,
Bright

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Easy. Not Expensive. Certain to Ultimately Help Decrease Gun Casualties. (Original Post) TygrBright Aug 2019 OP
You want to throw science at a problem? You want smart people to look into possible solutions? tclambert Aug 2019 #1
How exactly is the CDC research "Certain to Ultimately Help Decrease Gun Casualties."? former9thward Aug 2019 #2
Moscow Mitch will not go against his money or Putin Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #3

tclambert

(11,084 posts)
1. You want to throw science at a problem? You want smart people to look into possible solutions?
Mon Aug 12, 2019, 08:57 PM
Aug 2019

Are you some kind of socialist? The Holy Bible doesn't say anything about scientists solving problems. You just have to close your eyes, pray real loud, and have faith that you won't see or hear anything more about it.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
2. How exactly is the CDC research "Certain to Ultimately Help Decrease Gun Casualties."?
Mon Aug 12, 2019, 10:16 PM
Aug 2019

What are they going to find out that we don't already know?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Easy. Not Expensive. Cert...