BE BEST! Melanie's "former right-hand woman" provides Trump inauguration docs to DC Attorney General

[Miles Archer]

The summer swelter lingered in the swamp around President Donald Trump’s Washington in late July. Democrats in Congress continued to mull whether or not they would move to impeach him; Republicans, habitually, turned a blind eye to his hateful rhetoric and compulsive Twitter attacks. In New York the stock market teetered as traders awaited the administration’s next move on tariffs; prosecutors in the Southern District of New York appeared, without great logic or transparency, to close its campaign-finance investigation into Trump’s hush money payments without indicting anyone else involved apart from his longtime attorney Michael Cohen, who, by July, was more than two months into a three-year sentence at a federal facility in the Catskills.

While Cohen reads through the prison library and works out with “The Situation” in the Otisville Correctional Facility’s gym, his former neighbor on Park Avenue Stephanie Winston Wolkoff was having a different sort of summer. Last month, Wolkoff received a subpoena from the Washington, D.C., attorney general’s office, requesting documents related to President Trump’s inauguration, which Wolkoff had a heavy hand in planning. The $107 million event has been under investigation for months, including by federal prosecutors in New York and New Jersey, for profligate spending and questions about foreign donations. The latest subpoena appears to be probing potential self-dealing by the Trump Organization and members of the president’s family, according to two people familiar with the investigation.

Wolkoff complied with the request, according to these sources, by the July 26 deadline, which asked her to turn over records involving the inaugural event, the president’s family and associates, and expenditures by the inaugural committee that could shine a light on whether the nonprofit group provided private benefits to the Trump Organization. The attorney general appears to be particularly interested in payments being made through the inaugural committee to Trump-owned businesses, and whether there was a fair bidding process for contractors.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/investigating-trump-family

[empedocles]

1. Another important leak in the trump defensive dike

[MyOwnPeace]

2. Just wondering...........

The article says this: "The attorney general appears to be particularly interested in payments being made through the inaugural committee to Trump-owned businesses, and whether there was a fair bidding process for contractors."

Which "attorney general" are we talking about here? Is it Barr? If so, I've got questions about WHY he's so concerned:
*still more things to cover up?
*buddies on IQ45's list of "friends" that need to be protected?
*perhaps some questions about "stuff" happening that would make the "emoluments clause" something that he'd have to look up and try to understand?

Not that I don't have all the faith in the world in our "attorney general" - after all, he IS the legal mind (sic) of our country, right?

[Ramsey Barner]

4. The subpoenas came from the DC Attorney General's Office,

which is not federal, so it's not Barr, thank goodness.

[MyOwnPeace]

5. Wasn't sure, but...........

thanks for the clarification - it DOES make a difference!

[sandensea]

3. Be beast!

Dahlink.