Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBarr defends police, takes swipe at progressive prosecutors
Source: Associated Press
Barr defends police, takes swipe at progressive prosecutors
By MICHAEL BALSAMO
August 12, 2019
WASHINGTON (AP) Attorney General William Barr staunchly defended the work of law enforcement Monday promising to push for new legislation to swiftly carry out the death penalty for suspects who commit mass shootings or kill police officers, while also taking aim at prosecutors who style themselves as social justice reformers.
Barr, who had a tough-on-crime approach in his previous stint as the nations chief law enforcement officer in the early 1990s, lauded efforts to keep chronic offenders behind bars with long sentences. In his speech to the Fraternal Order of Police conference in New Orleans, he said that helped seriously cut down violent crime. He also said the government must have zero tolerance for suspects who resist the police and denounced protesters who threw water on New York City police a few weeks ago as prancing punks.
That hardline stance, however, puts Barr at odds with todays criminal justice reformers. While the tough-on-crime thinking was common among law enforcement officials in the early 1990s as the national violent crime rate peaked many in the criminal justice field now favor rehabilitation instead of incarceration.
President Donald Trump has pushed efforts to overhaul the criminal justice system, often touting bipartisan legislation he signed last year that gives judges more discretion in sentencing and eases mandatory minimum sentences. At the same time, the president has been an ardent defender of police once telling officers in a speech they shouldnt be too nice to suspects they arrest and has a long history of advocating for the death penalty. Those positions tend to popular with the presidents conservative political base.
In his speech, Barr praised federal prosecutors who have brought more cases against violent criminals and drug dealers in an effort to curb the opioid epidemic. But he added that more needs to be done, saying that most of the illegal drugs being trafficked into the U.S. are being brought in by Mexican drug organizations and other transnational gangs.
-snip-
By MICHAEL BALSAMO
August 12, 2019
WASHINGTON (AP) Attorney General William Barr staunchly defended the work of law enforcement Monday promising to push for new legislation to swiftly carry out the death penalty for suspects who commit mass shootings or kill police officers, while also taking aim at prosecutors who style themselves as social justice reformers.
Barr, who had a tough-on-crime approach in his previous stint as the nations chief law enforcement officer in the early 1990s, lauded efforts to keep chronic offenders behind bars with long sentences. In his speech to the Fraternal Order of Police conference in New Orleans, he said that helped seriously cut down violent crime. He also said the government must have zero tolerance for suspects who resist the police and denounced protesters who threw water on New York City police a few weeks ago as prancing punks.
That hardline stance, however, puts Barr at odds with todays criminal justice reformers. While the tough-on-crime thinking was common among law enforcement officials in the early 1990s as the national violent crime rate peaked many in the criminal justice field now favor rehabilitation instead of incarceration.
President Donald Trump has pushed efforts to overhaul the criminal justice system, often touting bipartisan legislation he signed last year that gives judges more discretion in sentencing and eases mandatory minimum sentences. At the same time, the president has been an ardent defender of police once telling officers in a speech they shouldnt be too nice to suspects they arrest and has a long history of advocating for the death penalty. Those positions tend to popular with the presidents conservative political base.
In his speech, Barr praised federal prosecutors who have brought more cases against violent criminals and drug dealers in an effort to curb the opioid epidemic. But he added that more needs to be done, saying that most of the illegal drugs being trafficked into the U.S. are being brought in by Mexican drug organizations and other transnational gangs.
-snip-
Read more: https://apnews.com/98ddc1df73d6493fb4241c0d1e9fefbc
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 833 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barr defends police, takes swipe at progressive prosecutors (Original Post)
Eugene
Aug 2019
OP
msongs
(67,355 posts)1. fraternal order of police. ugh nt
flotsam
(3,268 posts)2. Ya' know
I never got this-if you walk up and blow the head off a 5 year old child on a swing in the park that's one thing. But if you do the exact same thing to an armed and well-trained adult during his work day it's a totally different thing. And only one of them is likely to get you the death penalty. I would tell the judge I was about to sell a single cigarette and was in fear for my life.
JI7
(89,239 posts)3. this fucking pig needs to go
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)4. How does he feel about violations of the Hatch Act?
Or is it just a tough-on-some-crime pose?