General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Bees, not refugees': THE ENVIRONMENTALIST ROOTS OF ANTI-IMMIGRANT BIGOTRY
'Bees, not refugees': the environmentalist roots of anti-immigrant bigotryTHE GUARDIAN
Susie Cagle
Fri 16 Aug 2019 01.00 EDT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/15/anti
A complex but, to me, very educational study of environmentalism and xenophobia in the United States..
The current rise of eco-minded white supremacy follows a direct line from the powerful attorney, conservationist and eugenicist Madison Grant a friend of trees, Teddy Roosevelt, and the colonial superiority of white land stewardship. Grant, along with the influential naturalist John Muir and other early Anglo-Saxon conservationists, was critical in preserving the countrys wildlands for white enjoyment. Muir, who founded the Sierra Club environmental group in 1892, was disturbed by the uncleanliness of the Native Americans, whom he wanted removed from Yosemite. Grant successfully lobbied, in equal measure, for the creation of protected national parks and the restriction of immigration by non-whites.
Environmentalists were hardcore eugenicists. They were as committed to racial thinking as they were to protecting the great redwoods in California, said Heidi Beirich, intelligence project director at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
snip
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Reading John Tanton's obituary [link:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/18/us/john-tanton-dead.html| shows how much damage one person can do.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)What I dont get is at the same time in the 80s that they were hard core anti immigration & anti migrant moves north, they were pushing for designated land track to accomidate animal migration throughout the Western Hemisphere
One only has to look at a map of the Western Hemisphere to see what the population of humans looks like over the same land
Prioritizing the blame it on migrants and immigration while they were living and working in the US with mass throw away consumption and land destruction takeover running everything on electric and fossil fuels Hmmm now what is the word for that ?
Even after the 1996 decree it just splintered
1996
Under pressure from immigration activists, the club's board adopted a position of neutrality, declaring, "The board's actions reflect a desire to put the immigration debate to rest within the club and to focus on other pressing components of our population program. The board instructs all club chapters, groups, committees, and other entities to take no position on immigration policy."
But some members continued
1998
In response to the neutrality declaration, a group called Sierrans for U.S. Population Stabilization (SUSPS) brought the issue to club membership in the club annual election. The National Journal reported that prominent Sierran Anne Ehrlich, a long-time advocate of reduced immigration, had taken the position that the club could not act on the immigration-population connection as long as its minority-group members saw racism as the underlying motivation of those who wanted to limit immigration. The SUSPS had s proposal to reverse the neutrality declaration for their own group
Oh those pesky minority members..
2004
In another vote, club membership defeated an effort to elect immigration-limitation advocates to its board. SUSPS Followers tried again but other club leaders contended that those who wanted to limit immigration were motivated by racist bigotry
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)John Muir was born in Scotland
Igel
(35,300 posts)There was a very real, and very valid, argument in the '90s in So-Cal about immigration and what it was doing to the environment.
The thing about values, the reason that not everybody has the same values, is that sometimes you have to choose. You can't always fully enjoy the privilege of fully expressing every value you have.
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)They've been doing it for a while? That's because they never have new ideas
rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)dalton99a
(81,451 posts)Environmentalisms Racist History
By Jedediah Purdy
August 13, 2015
Madison Grant is known less for his conservationist efforts than for his book The Passing of the Great Race, or The Racial Basis of European History, a pseudo-scientific work of white supremacism.
PHOTOGRAPH COURTESY NEW YORK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Madison Grant (Yale College 1887, Columbia Law School) liked to be photographed with a fedora, or just his dauntingly long head, tilted about thirty degrees to the right. He belonged, like his political ally Teddy Roosevelt, to a Manhattan aristocracy defined by bloodline and money. But Grant, like many young men of his vintage, felt duty-bound to do more than enjoy his privilege. He made himself a credible wildlife zoologist, was instrumental in creating the Bronx Zoo, and founded the first organizations dedicated to preserving American bison and the California redwoods.
Grant spent his career at the center of the same energetic conservationist circle as Roosevelt. This band of reformers did much to create the countrys national parks, forests, game refuges, and other public landsthe system of environmental stewardship and public access that has been called Americas best idea. They developed the conviction that a countrys treatment of its land and wildlife is a measure of its character. Now that natural selection had given way to humanitys complete mastery of the globe, as Grant wrote in 1909, his generation had the responsibility of saying what forms of life shall be preserved.
Grant has been pushed to the margins of environmentalisms history, however. He is often remembered for another reason: his 1916 book The Passing of the Great Race, or The Racial Basis of European History, a pseudo-scientific work of white supremacism that warns of the decline of the Nordic peoples. In Grants racial theory, Nordics were a natural aristocracy, marked by noble, generous instincts and a gift for political self-governance, who were being overtaken by the Alpine and Mediterranean populations. His work influenced the Immigration Act of 1924, which restricted immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe and Africa and banned migrants from the Middle East and Asia. Adolf Hitler wrote Grant an admiring letter, calling the book my Bible, which has given it permanent status on the ultra-right. Anders Breivik, the Norwegian extremist who killed sixty-nine young Labour Party members, in 2011, drew on Grants racial theory in his own manifesto.
Grants fellow conservationists supported his racist activism. Roosevelt wrote Grant a letter praising The Passing of the Great Race, which appeared as a blurb on later editions, calling it a capital book; in purpose, in vision, in grasp of the facts our people most need to realize. Henry Fairfield Osborn, who headed the New York Zoological Society and the board of trustees of the American Museum of Natural History (and, as a member of the U.S. Geological Survey, named the Tyrannosaurus rex and the Velociraptor), wrote a foreword to the book. Osborn argued that conservation of that race which has given us the true spirit of Americanism is not a matter either of racial pride or of racial prejudice; it is a matter of love of country.
...
malaise
(268,930 posts)Now that natural selection had given way to humanitys complete mastery of the globe, as Grant wrote in 1909, his generation had the responsibility of saying what forms of life shall be preserved.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)...I find here in rural southern Illinois that it all seems to go together... the same rednecks who are deathly afraid of immigrants and african americans are the climate change deniers and the ones burning their garbage and calling environmentalists commies or something.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I live in up-state NY-- near rochester.. 95 % of "Up-State' is rural-- you can imagine the rest..
dumb as a bag of pigeon feathers....
I mean the 27th district AGAIN elected Christopher Collins for god's sake !!
The reason NY 'votes democratic' is because of NYC... with help from the smaller cities along I-90, and a few others...
malaise
(268,930 posts)Thanks
Get thee to the greatest page
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Oh, wow !!!!
Malaise saying, "Get thee to the greatest page."
is like ......hitting the big time....
Makes my day,. even though it will never make it..
Seriously this is very interesting
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But there is a lot I have no idea about..
malaise
(268,930 posts)Every day I discover that I don't know an awful lot of stuff
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)and lost.
The Sierra Club was vulnerable to organized bigotry because of our democratic structure. As we struggled internally to reject the agenda of Jon Tanton and his followers, Tantons movement grew because of his access to the Sierra Club community. He gained new followers and credibility because of his association with the Sierra Club. Part of the reason that his ideas are still popular is because the Sierra Club was slow to act. And unfortunately, those ideas are still alive and well in the public discourse.
In the years Ive been a part of the Sierra Club community, weve been working to make things right by showing up in solidarity with immigrant communities and organizations advocating for immigrant rights. Sometimes that work is driven by the natural connections between immigrant rights issues and our work to protect the natural and human environment -- for example, our work to highlight the true costs of the border wall, which itself denigrates ecosystems as well as human communities. Or our work to transform corporate trade policies that contribute to forced migration and environmental injustice. We also amplify our partners voices on social media and share our access to power and funding.
Over the past year, in partnership with our allies, weve co-led a strong fight against border militarization and physical barriers in the Southwest ...
How the Sierra Clubs History With Immigrant Rights Is Shaping Our Future
By Hop Hopkins
November 2, 2018