General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLog-cabin Republican gets asked about Trump. His response: "But what about Bill Clinton?"
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/08/log-cabin-republican-burned-to-the-ground-on-live-tv-for-idiotic-op-ed-defending-trump-on-lgbtq-issues/Well, I think its comical that the extreme left and the mainstream media that is trying to promulgate this Trump Derangement Syndrome of him being the most anti-LGBTQ president, when you have people like Bill Clinton who signed the Defense of Marriage Act, who signed Dont Ask Dont Tell, said Moran. Even people like President Bush, who pushed a federal ban on gay marriage and tried to eliminate marriage equality. This revisionist history is simply not true.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)pocketbook.
The dumb thing about that is you would think they would have learned by now that all GOP administrations destroy the economy and all DNC fix it.
This is just dumb on their part.
tblue37
(65,336 posts)bitterross
(4,066 posts)He is a moron. Any Trump supporter is either a racist or a moron. Period.
mitch96
(13,893 posts)Classic spin tactic.. It does not answer the question and attempts to change the narrative.. Don't fall for it. Re ask the question. State we are not talking about Clinton we are talking about tRump. We can talk about Clinton later... Frustrates the shit out of them
m
TexasBushwhacker
(20,175 posts)nbut he DOES support Trump.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Why not be honest and call yourselves the Gilded Cage Republicans? It fits perfectly in more ways than one.
Indykatie
(3,696 posts)Their Claim that they were/are Republicans because "fiscal matters" were their number one political issue was/is bull sh*t. Trump has caused deficit spending to explode with no regard for fiscal responsibility. The GOP only raise the topic of fiscal restraint when talking about safety net spending. They never have any problems borrowing to fund tax cuts or military spending.
Ms. Toad
(34,065 posts)But - the Log Cabin Republicans are not wrong that Clinton has a crappy track record on LGBT rights.
And before you assert, "that was then - times have changed:"
My faith community took my lesbian marriage under its care a quarter of a century ago, two years before Clinton signed a law declaring the Federal Government would not, and states were not required to, recognize it.
More than a quarter of a century before that (in 1963), although it did not move all the way to marriage - my faith community said this, "An act which expresses true affection between two individuals and gives pleasure to them both, does not seem to us to be sinful by reason alone of the fact that it is homosexual."
Further - look at all of the individuals (of all party affiliations) skewered for things like blackface - that happened "then." If we are holding them accountable for their acts back then, there is no "get out of jail free" card for Clinton.
There are matters on which the Democratic record is only marginally better than the Republican, LGBT rights and immigration being two of then.
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)Clinton had suggested removing the prohibition on gay members in service
But after the rightwing backlash, "don't ask -- don't tell" was what he could get
It was a lousy policy: nobody was happy with it
But it was better than the policy it replaced
We would not have had "don't ask -- don't tell" except for all the hysterical rightwing hyperventilating over Clinton's original proposal to let everyone serve in the military
And (of course) "don't ask -- don't tell" effectively served as a transitional policy leading to a policy allowing everyone to serve in the military
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)It's inappropriate to consider DOMA out of the political context that spawned it
There was a giant rightwing noise machine shrieking and moaning about the need for a federal constitutional amendment against gay marriage
Was DOMA unconstitutional? Yes: in the end, the Supreme Court eviscerated it
Did DOMA make sense? Yes: it effectively defused the shrieking and moaning noise machine for a while
It saved us from a really vicious federal constitutional amendment