Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:01 PM Aug 2019

Medicare vs Medicare Advantage plan

I've been on Medicare a few years and tried various Advantage plans. The only one worth anything was Kaiser Permanente when I lived 2 years in Atlanta.

As we talk about "medicare for all" I want to be sure we are doing the math.

When you see the doctor look at how much is not paid by straight Medicare and make sure it is more than your copayment in the Advantage plan. Look at the costs of all your copays, deductables and co-insurance. Is it more than what you would pay for a supplemental to cover you when things go really bad (and expensive)

For me, I figured out straight Medicare was my cheapest way to go. Medicare paid all but $7 of primary care. It paid all but about $27 on my cardiologist. My drug plan is hit and miss. I use Good RX a lot.

Do the math. And if we are going to successfully sell Medicare for all, we really need to talk about the math for those under 65.

It only adds up with Medicare negotiates drug prices and puts a lot more rules on the advantage plans.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Medicare vs Medicare Advantage plan (Original Post) KentuckyWoman Aug 2019 OP
There is no math. No real MFA plan has been proposed yet. They call it MFA. brewens Aug 2019 #1
Both the senate and house bills, introduced every session, Voltaire2 Aug 2019 #14
Keep in mind that Advantage plans vary a great deal, PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2019 #2
I agree completely! It's far more complicated than it should be. KentuckyWoman Aug 2019 #11
I am turning 71 on Friday. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2019 #15
boy howdy. just having this conversation w someone yesterday. mopinko Aug 2019 #3
The main reason I have gone with Medicare Advantage enough Aug 2019 #4
It requires changes droidamus2 Aug 2019 #5
I still prefer National Health Service maths.... mwooldri Aug 2019 #6
My Advantage plan does much better unc70 Aug 2019 #7
I'm using Essence currently but I will check to see if Aetna has a plan available in my area Sherman A1 Aug 2019 #8
I went with traditional Medicare. LiberalBrooke Aug 2019 #9
I would have been screwed with straight Medicare. elocs Aug 2019 #10
In what State, may I ask do you live? Are you on SSDI? YOHABLO Aug 2019 #13
I live in Wisconsin & retired at 62 collecting SS. elocs Aug 2019 #17
Well all sounds good. I'm debating on whether I need to go on Med.Advan. myself. YOHABLO Aug 2019 #19
Just remember that Advantage was created by Repubilcans in... El Supremo Aug 2019 #12
health care would be cheaper if we didn't buy executive mansions Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #16
I've found the same thing. If you weigh what an Advantage plan might cost vs. anticipated Vinca Aug 2019 #18
Please find out the rules on supplementals KentuckyWoman Aug 2019 #20

brewens

(13,538 posts)
1. There is no math. No real MFA plan has been proposed yet. They call it MFA.
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:10 PM
Aug 2019

That doesn't mean we would end up with a national health care plan that is exactly the same Medicare is now.

Voltaire2

(12,958 posts)
14. Both the senate and house bills, introduced every session,
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 09:16 PM
Aug 2019

are fairly detailed. Both are comprehensive and universal. They essentially cover everything except cosmetic surgery. There are no premiums copays or deductibles except for a small prescription copay.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
2. Keep in mind that Advantage plans vary a great deal,
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:11 PM
Aug 2019

depending on where you live.

But you do need to do your homework to figure out what works best for you.

It should not be this complicated.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
11. I agree completely! It's far more complicated than it should be.
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:28 PM
Aug 2019

And every area is unique. Every person is unique. That's why I'm encouraging people to do the math and keep an open mind.

In my dream world if you are inside the US of A you can see a doctor with no costs beyond your taxes. If you are here visiting, then other arrangements can be made.

That isn't likely to happen any time soon, but we can work in that direction. In the meantime, do the math.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
15. I am turning 71 on Friday.
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 01:13 AM
Aug 2019

I have the amazing good fortune to be annoyingly healthy. Honestly, were a genie to appear and grand me one wish, I'd go for something like "Let no one have less good health than I do." I know, I know, a lot of good doctors would need to find new employment, but I'd still wish for that.

I think what outrages me the most is that ANYONE should go bankrupt because of medical expenses.

mopinko

(70,000 posts)
3. boy howdy. just having this conversation w someone yesterday.
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:11 PM
Aug 2019

medicare for all is not a good slogan for a lot of people who are on medicare.
just turned 65, and still havent figured out what i am going to do.
medicaid for all would likely be a much better way to go, at least medicaid in blue states.

just how hacked up and convoluted the whole thing is gives me the heebie jeebies about what single payer could end up being after a few decades of assholes chipping away at it.

got 2 doctors that i love and depend on, and having trouble finding a plan that includes both.

enough

(13,255 posts)
4. The main reason I have gone with Medicare Advantage
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:13 PM
Aug 2019

instead of straight Medicare is for the difference in coverage for hospital care in the event of serious illness or injury. The premium is a lot lower than any comparable Medigap or other supplemental plan i’ve seen.

I’d be interested to know other DUers’ experiences with this. Thanks for this post, KentuckyWoman.

droidamus2

(1,699 posts)
5. It requires changes
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:17 PM
Aug 2019

I think the idea of 'Medicare for all' is not just moving everybody to the current form of Medicare but is to expand and fix the current Medicare to give everybody free health care at the point of access. To do this you would remove any premiums, mine is currently $123 per month, no deductibles and no copays everything would be paid through taxes. They would also add vision, hearing and psychiatric care.

mwooldri

(10,299 posts)
6. I still prefer National Health Service maths....
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:17 PM
Aug 2019

$0 copay to see doctor. $0 copay to see specialist. About $10 copay for a drug, or $150 for a year's prescription drug prepay certificate... Or $0 copay in Scotland and Wales.

Premiums are 12% of earnings over $215 a week, after $1250 they drop to 2%.

I like this easy maths...

unc70

(6,109 posts)
7. My Advantage plan does much better
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:19 PM
Aug 2019

I realize plans vary from county to county, even from the same insurer. My Advantage plan from Aetna is $0 per month, $10 deductible for most doctor visit, $0 or $15 for most prescriptions.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
8. I'm using Essence currently but I will check to see if Aetna has a plan available in my area
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:48 PM
Aug 2019

just turned 65 and Essence seemed to be the best option as it was $0 per month, $5 for my primary and $35 for specialists visits. My Rx's are $0 right now as they are generics.

Thanks for the tip on Aetna.

LiberalBrooke

(527 posts)
9. I went with traditional Medicare.
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:54 PM
Aug 2019

All of the Advantage plans had very narrow choices of doctors. Also limited hospitals in their coverage. The networks were just too small. I realize that is how they save money but I wanted and needed a larger pool of doctors to meet all of my medical conditions.

elocs

(22,542 posts)
10. I would have been screwed with straight Medicare.
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:10 PM
Aug 2019

With $1000/month income I am under the 100% federal poverty level so the state would pay my $135/month for part B but my Medicare deductible would have been $2000 every 6 months--1/3 of my income if I needed the care.

So I saw all the ads for am I getting all the benefits I deserve so I went with United Healthcare dual care coverage where what Medicare doesn't pay, Medicaid picks up the rest.
No monthly premium and my only cost is $3.40 for prescriptions. I also get dental and vision coverage as well as $800/year for over the counter healthcare items.
So my Advantage plan saved me big time and I don't see how Medicare for all would make anything better for me so I beware the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Not that I'm likely to ever see Medicare for All become a law in my lifetime, but it's a nice campaign promise and not one who supports it will ever explain how it would ever become law.

elocs

(22,542 posts)
17. I live in Wisconsin & retired at 62 collecting SS.
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 05:57 AM
Aug 2019

From 62-65 I was on BadgerCare, Wisconsin's Medicaid for adults without children whose income is under the 100% federal poverty level.
It paid for everything except a $1.25 copay for prescriptions.
So at 65 I go on Medicare which I paid in to for decades when I was working. Suddenly huge deductibles and copays under traditional Medicare. So I am far, far better off with the Medicare Advantage plan with United Healthcare and actually better off than I was under BadgerCare.

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
12. Just remember that Advantage was created by Repubilcans in...
Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:29 PM
Aug 2019

their attempt to privatize Medicare. They partially succeeded.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,254 posts)
16. health care would be cheaper if we didn't buy executive mansions
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 01:22 AM
Aug 2019

We pay for all health care, everywhere, for everyone, plus we pay for giant, flashy skyscrapers for each insurance company, plus all the other perks they grab, plus an army of claims deniers, plus mountains of profit, plus golden parachutes and mansions and yachts.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
18. I've found the same thing. If you weigh what an Advantage plan might cost vs. anticipated
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 06:55 AM
Aug 2019

bills you will be on the hook for, sometimes it's better to have straight Medicare. I've also got the impression - and it certainly could be wrong - that some providers bill less for services for straight Medicare patients. I know the amount I'm on the hook for is not at all unreasonable and I've been on it for almost 6 years. Things change, of course, but for now straight Medicare is working out well for me.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
20. Please find out the rules on supplementals
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 07:47 AM
Aug 2019

Some states put an age limit on being able to switch to advantage plans or buy supplemental policies without a medical exam. Once you hit that age, the insurer can jack up the rates quite a lot or refuse to cover anything "pre existing".

Th reality is beyond a certain age you are far more likely to end up in an expensive situation. In my personal case, a supplemental premium with no additional out of pocket costs is the way to go. They will cover everything Medicare doesn't pay for what A & B covers. If your income is low enough, you might qualify for Medicaid instead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Medicare vs Medicare Adva...