General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy some Christians love the meanest parts of Trump
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/08/ben-howe-evangelical-christians-support-trump/596308/?utm_medium=offsite&utm_source=yahoo&utm_campaign=yahoo-non-hosted&yptr=yahoo"Ben Howe is angry at evangelicals. As he describes it, he is angry that they didnt just vote for Donald Trump in record numbers, but repeatedly provide moral cover for his outrageous failings. He is angry that leaders of the religious right, who long claimed to be the champions of American morality, appear to have gladly traded their values for power. He is angry that Christians claim they support the president because they want to end abortion or protect religious liberty, when supporting Trump suggests that what they really want is a champion who will mock and crush their perceived enemies."
nycbos
(6,034 posts)... I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)Upthevibe
(8,035 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,589 posts)Not all religious people are like this obviously, but far too many of them are. I couldn't stomach the hypocrisy. I had to get away from it.
Caliman73
(11,730 posts)Unless it is specifically and aggressively countered, religion will often lead to authoritarianism. If you think about it, the point of religion is to organize and prescribe behavior in people toward the dogma of the religion. Like you said, it doesn't always lead to authoritarianism and hypocrisy, but it certainly lends itself to the prospect. Any leader who becomes infatuated with power, or who is a zealot for certain causes, already has a built in structure from which to dictate action to followers. They are entrusted as the "representatives to God on earth" so they hold the keys so to speak. If they tell you that condoms are bad, or withholding your donations to the church, or Black people are bad, and you reject it, then you are rejecting God in some way.
tirebiter
(2,535 posts)Its not about morals. Its about power. He was chosen to achieve their ends
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,753 posts).
?resize=700x700
Xolodno
(6,390 posts)There's a large segment of Evangelicals, if they went to a church that preached love, tolerance, forgiveness, etc. They would stop attending.
But if they hear hell fire, crushing enemies, etc. They eat it up and then think its up to them to do God's work...when its pretty clear God will handle it and all that a Christian has to do, is get out of the way.
lindysalsagal
(20,660 posts)Skittles
(153,142 posts)NO.FUCKING.WAY.
zaj
(3,433 posts)Because it is a proselytizing, it's very nature is defined as failure unless you defeat every other belief system.
Islam, Judaism, science... Anything that conflicts with the spread of 2000+ year old information... must be defeated.
That creates a moral greed. That greed corrupts the person.
The non-proselytizing religions have a chance at being sustained moral examples for people.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Skittles
(153,142 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)So, only non-Christians support Trump, right?
Skittles
(153,142 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)That means you consider them to be non-Christians, doesn't it? Only non-Christians support Trump.
anyone who supports a lying, pussy-grabbing conman who digs putting kids in cages can NOT be Christian, but I don't think them as "non-Christians", they are just deluded assholes
over and OUT
Caliman73
(11,730 posts)I understand what you are saying but the reality is that Christianity comprises at least 2 if not more Major traditions (Catholic & Protestant) that is if you lump the Orthodox faith traditions in with the Catholic (since their split was not as complete). Within the Protestant traditions there are thousands of denominations and styles of worship each of which have liberal and conservative factions.
Each of the above have some kind of belief that they are the "correct" way of following Christ and the others are "misguided".
So, the idea that "no real Christian ... " is a bit complicated.
Karadeniz
(22,493 posts)zaj
(3,433 posts)... and have control, not to help people.
Modern proselytizing religion is the most powerful social weapon of control ever invented.
It promises to answer every deepest fear and larhest mystery, if you surrender everything you have or ever will have to the most powerful man in the universe, so sayeth... ....any random dude who wants power, fame, wealth and control.
Every generation has 1000's of those random dudes seeking abuse the Innovation of modern religion.
TlalocW
(15,380 posts)After it's done everything it can to convince you you're lame.
TlalocW
pnwest
(3,266 posts)TlalocW
(15,380 posts)TlalocW
Thunderbeast
(3,406 posts)They wanted one here on Earth.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)I have no sympathy for the fundies who twisted the words in both the Old Testament and the New into giving blanket support for someone as un-Christian as that man in the White House.
As far as I'm concerned, their slavish devotion to Donald Trump ought to be remembered for the remainder of his time in office and for decades afterwards.
Capt. America
(2,477 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)Monotheism or polytheism with one all powerful deity over one emperor who rules as the arm of their god on earth. Thousands of years of this documented by the ruling elites in waring cultures as a tool of control and humans still don't get it.
TlalocW
(15,380 posts)That Nones - those who identify as not belonging to a religion and flat-out atheists - are now the same percentage of the population as evangelicals and Catholics, and it's their own damn fault. The latter refuse to do the one moral thing when it comes to abusive priests and that's to turn them over to the police, and the former have abandoned everything they supposedly stood for in order to prop up Trump.
TlalocW
lindysalsagal
(20,660 posts)above everyone else's safety?
LOTS
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... in America.
Well no shit !!!
Humans don't generally like pious, hate filled racist who abuse children
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)their enemies."
Um, mock...yes. Crush? LOL. Their whole movement has done nothing but lose ground since they sold their souls to Trump. Church attendance is way down. Trump's poll numbers are way down. More Americans are calling themselves atheists or agnostics. And the Democrats retook the House and made huge gains in state governments. And Republicans can no longer deny (at least not with any credibility) the rampant racism in their party. And they sure as hell can't claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility.
Is that what being crushed feels like? Well, I'll take more of it.
Caliman73
(11,730 posts)Some types of Christians have wanted to maintain or expand their social control for a long time and have sought to do so in different ways. I think that as our understanding of things grows, the space for religion will tend to get smaller and I think that a lot of people understand that. I don't have a problem with people having religion to guide their own behavior but the problem is that people have gotten so used to Christianity being the default lens by which things in the US have been seen, that they are reacting to the loss of dominance.
Christian dominance is slipping and some people are desperate so they reach out to a person who boasts about retaining the dominance and installs certain Dominionists into his circle of power. It isn't necessarily about what they are getting, but about how they feel about getting it. There will be a "let down" after Trump is gone from office.
walkingman
(7,593 posts)Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)progressoid
(49,976 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)It's a big clue to so much of what we don't understand. It's also important to realize that though they started with a natural disagreement, contempt for and misunderstanding of liberalism, seditious forces have worked for years now to turn weaknesses of understanding into passionate convictions.
These aren't our brightest bulbs, and they are among our most passionately anxious and sincere. Btw, while we're at it, note the very strong resemblance between them and their attitudes toward liberals/Democrats to those of their similarly passionately sincere anti-democratic counterparts on the farther left.