Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ohiogal

(31,979 posts)
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 09:12 AM Aug 2019

And they wonder why we say that they hate women

"Title X made sure poor women could have access to health care. The Trump administration has compromised that."

I am consumed with fury after reading this!!!!

This is from the NYT so you may encounter a paywall -- try incognito mode to view, it is worth reading.

************************

This has been an ominous year for reproductive rights in America, with states including Georgia, Alabama and now Tennessee in a race to the bottom to pass the most extreme anti-abortion law in the nation.

But while those high-profile abortion bans make their way through the courts — they were designed to provoke legal challenges that could threaten Roe v. Wade — a more immediate threat to women’s health care has been brewing. The Trump administration has quietly been working to gut the Title X family planning program, which helps poor women afford birth control, cancer screenings and testing for H.I.V. and other sexually transmitted infections. On Monday, the administration’s efforts paid off: Planned Parenthood, which serves about 40 percent of Title X patients around the country, felt forced to withdraw from the program.

The nearly 50-year-old Title X program is an unsung hero of American public health. In 2017, Title X clinics served more than four million women, 42 percent of them uninsured, according to the federal Office of Population Affairs, which administers the program. The Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports reproductive rights, found that Title X clinics helped prevent more than 822,000 unintended pregnancies in 2015. The institute estimates that for every dollar the federal government spends on family planning, it saves more than $7.

The Trump administration’s new Title X rule, announced in February, will lay waste to that progress. The rule bars facilities that receive Title X money from providing abortions, even with a separate source of money, as has been required by law for decades. It also prohibits clinics from referring patients for an abortion at a different facility — in other words, staff members would effectively have to pretend that abortion is not a legal medical option.

And that’s exactly the point for this administration: to treat abortion as though it were illegal, until perhaps that wishful thinking becomes reality. A spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services said last week that by leaving Title X, Planned Parenthood is “choosing to place a higher priority on the ability to refer for abortion instead of continuing to receive federal funds to provide a broad range of acceptable and effective family planning methods and services.” According to the Trump administration, there’s abortion, and then there’s “acceptable” care.

At the same time, making it harder for women to get birth control isn’t an accidental side effect of this rule change. Current and former members of the administration have expressed opposition to birth control, and one of only three new recipients of Title X grants this year is a Catholic-affiliated group that does not provide contraception beyond guidance on the so-called rhythm method.

More:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/opinion/planned-parenthood-title-x.html?em_pos=small&ref=headline&nl_art=3&te=1&nl=opinion-today&emc=edit_ty_20190820?campaign_id=39&instance_id=11768&segment_id=16313&user_id=a9aa4f5d6050c1b2fa535a7ed5551a5b®i_id=74838209emc=edit_ty_20190820



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And they wonder why we say that they hate women (Original Post) Ohiogal Aug 2019 OP
Comment after article -- Ohiogal Aug 2019 #1
We fucking outnumber them!!!! Amimnoch Aug 2019 #10
Yes, they put women on a pedestal NastyRiffraff Aug 2019 #11
yeah, to look up our skirts librechik Aug 2019 #14
LOL! lunatica Aug 2019 #17
oldie but goodie! librechik Aug 2019 #19
Yes, that too NastyRiffraff Aug 2019 #20
I thought Congress passed laws malaise Aug 2019 #2
Stalin, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Salvini, Kim, Xi.. pangaia Aug 2019 #4
I'm familiar with it but I had no idea it lunatica Aug 2019 #18
Back to the 50's! B Stieg Aug 2019 #3
ERA! BadgerMom Aug 2019 #5
If it can be Polybius Aug 2019 #15
I know, but particularly if we elect a woman BadgerMom Aug 2019 #16
With Trump's Help, Republicans Have Ramped Up Their War In Women dlk Aug 2019 #6
Is it called "Title X", or "Title 10"? JohnnyRingo Aug 2019 #7
i think you say Title 10. barbtries Aug 2019 #12
The Republican Party is violating the 1st Amendment. Lonestarblue Aug 2019 #8
+1000 Duppers Aug 2019 #13
I'm Starting To Think RobinA Aug 2019 #9

Ohiogal

(31,979 posts)
1. Comment after article --
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 09:43 AM
Aug 2019

"There is also work being done to make it legal to fire a woman who is pregnant and unmarried if her employer claims it goes against "sincere religious beliefs". So, not only will it be ever harder to prevent pregnancy or to abort one, but one can also be fired for being pregnant. (Better not get raped!)

THEN these same women will have difficulty getting assistance and benefits for themselves and eventually their children because of changes to aid programs making her either have to choose abject poverty, or working and possibly loosing benefits. An excellent dis-empowerment campaign indeed."

But Republicans like to say "We put women on a pedestal!" Please, don't make me vomit!

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
10. We fucking outnumber them!!!!
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 12:08 PM
Aug 2019

we need to start smashing them by their own fucking sick rules..

We need liberal/progressive/Democratic supporting managers, owners, businesses, and corporations to start:

Refusing to hire Christian right wingers that have been divorced and remarried.
Firing Christian right wingers that have been divorced and remarried.
Have some of our Atheist brethren fire/refuse to hire right wing Christians due to their own belief.
Have our LGBT owned/operated bakeries/catering services/hair dressers/ stylists/musicians/artists/photographers refuse to perform services at right wing Christian weddings where either the groom or bride is going on their 2nd marriage.

Give those fuckers a taste of their own bitterness medicine!!!

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
11. Yes, they put women on a pedestal
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 12:11 PM
Aug 2019

The pedestal is high, unstable, and the platform is tiny. One small wrong step and you fall.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
4. Stalin, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Salvini, Kim, Xi..
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 10:47 AM
Aug 2019

Miller, Bannon, Pompeo, Bolton, Ross, Mnuchin..

oh that's enough.
Getting depressed --and I get to rehearse THIS tonight.. (although) not with that orchestra.l LOL)))))
Are you guys in Jamaica familiar with the Huapango---
pretty interesting--

In 2011, Huapango, as a form of Mexican mariachi music, was added to the UNESCO List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity – an honor which had also been bestowed upon the healthy Mediterranean diet in 2010 and the Tango in 2009!

plus Capriccio Espagnol, Espana. Congo del Fuego and Brahms 2..





lunatica

(53,410 posts)
18. I'm familiar with it but I had no idea it
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 04:41 PM
Aug 2019

is called Huapango music.. Thanks!

I’m pretty sure I’ve heard that piece before. Probably in a movie.

B Stieg

(2,410 posts)
3. Back to the 50's!
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 10:17 AM
Aug 2019

Conservatism is really about controlling minitorian bodies, especially if they're not the minority!

Polybius

(15,385 posts)
15. If it can be
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 01:15 PM
Aug 2019

Legal scholars disagree if we'd have to start from scratch again, since Congress put a date on its expiration. It would no doubt go to the SC.

BadgerMom

(2,770 posts)
16. I know, but particularly if we elect a woman
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 04:32 PM
Aug 2019

President or Vice President, it feels as though it should be a priority. The party is finally targeting state houses with more seriousness. I feel that if we must start from scratch, let’s do it.

dlk

(11,552 posts)
6. With Trump's Help, Republicans Have Ramped Up Their War In Women
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 10:56 AM
Aug 2019

It’s abundantly clear, Republicans require a permanent servant class and they have recently escalated their efforts in that direction.

JohnnyRingo

(18,624 posts)
7. Is it called "Title X", or "Title 10"?
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 11:29 AM
Aug 2019

I don't want to sound like too much of an idiot when I discuss it.

Lonestarblue

(9,971 posts)
8. The Republican Party is violating the 1st Amendment.
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 11:41 AM
Aug 2019

Since the Congress did bot pass a law establishing Christian beliefs as the basis for health funding policies, neither should the president be allowed to do so. The Supreme Court also erred in allowing employers to hide behind religious beliefs in denying birth control to their employees.

When Democrats are in power again, I want them to deregulate the birth control pill and make it available over the counter without a prescription. It is as safe as many drugs that are already available OTC. It would be one small step toward thwarting the religious hypocrites who think their beliefs are the law of the land.

RobinA

(9,888 posts)
9. I'm Starting To Think
Tue Aug 20, 2019, 12:02 PM
Aug 2019

(and I can't believe I'm even saying this) that abortion would be better to go back to the states. My state would surely be one to outlaw it at first, but the current situation creates problems for the whole country. Plus, outright ban in some places might be easier to deal with than the countrywide drip, drip, drip of the rights we are losing in dribs and drabs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And they wonder why we sa...