Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:33 AM Aug 2019

2 Condos Were Illegally Converted Into 18 Micro Apartments In NYC

https://www.npr.org/2019/08/20/752791717/2-condos-were-illegally-converted-into-18-micro-apartments-in-nyc

Two Manhattan landlords took an unusual — and illegal — route to double their rentable space: cutting their two condos in half horizontally so they could rent out 18 tiny apartments in their Lower East Side building, according to the New York City Department of Buildings.

"The ceiling heights were 4.5 feet to 6 feet tall on each level, depending on where you were standing," Department of Buildings spokesperson Abigail Kunitz said in an email to NPR.

When an inspector visited the building this month, he found half-size doors and low ceilings, forcing him to kneel in an improvised hallway. A small staircase connected the two floors. Along with unapproved structural changes, the Department of Buildings says, the inspector found the space riddled with unpermitted electrical and plumbing work.

The compressed living spaces prompted New York City Council Member Ben Kallos to compare the arrangement to the movie Being John Malkovich, which features a cramped office — and a tiny door — on floor 7 1/2 of a Manhattan building.


OK, this won't be popular, but: we should be rewarding this, not assessing fines. The landlords found a way to get rent down to $600 in the Lower East Side. We need denser living spaces in high-rent cities, and this is a pretty creative example of one.

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2 Condos Were Illegally Converted Into 18 Micro Apartments In NYC (Original Post) Recursion Aug 2019 OP
No. Just no. Hamburgered plumbing and electricity? Having to crawl in? Nothing up to code? Hekate Aug 2019 #1
There's not a single building in the Lower East Side that's up to code Recursion Aug 2019 #2
Manhattan is never going to be an affordable place to live. meadowlander Aug 2019 #5
It has been in the past (nt) Recursion Aug 2019 #15
Finite space. Infinite demand. meadowlander Aug 2019 #17
Come on, Manhattan has had the strictest rent control in the country for 70 years now Recursion Aug 2019 #23
In the past Dorian Gray Aug 2019 #35
Why are they still allowed to rent them out if they violate codes? MichMan Aug 2019 #37
Why are local governments so often corrupt and easily captured... Recursion Aug 2019 #38
4.5 foot ceilings? That's a death trap. EMS and Fire cannot get in there in emergencies. RockRaven Aug 2019 #3
I also thought of the Ghost Ship, which was an artists' colony of sorts. So very many died. nt Hekate Aug 2019 #7
Thats immediately what I thought of when I read the OP 912gdm Aug 2019 #46
Plus 1000 Demovictory9 Aug 2019 #8
Tokyo makes it work (nt) Recursion Aug 2019 #12
Pointing to Tokyo as an exemplar only proves my point -- done within the rules. RockRaven Aug 2019 #18
Obviously the additions need to be torn down and everything built to code Recursion Aug 2019 #26
If people were dogs you wouldn't be allowed to keep them in those conditions. meadowlander Aug 2019 #4
I've shared bathrooms with more than 9 people Recursion Aug 2019 #10
Your SRO room with its regulation-height ceiling was a palace compared with these cubby holes BeyondGeography Aug 2019 #33
Back when America was Great? GeorgeGist Aug 2019 #45
No! WTF are you thinking? procon Aug 2019 #6
So fix the fire exits Recursion Aug 2019 #11
It's not about the fire exits being broken, meadowlander Aug 2019 #16
What good would that do? procon Aug 2019 #19
Hold on, think about what you just wrote Recursion Aug 2019 #21
Wrong Roy Rolling Aug 2019 #25
There was never any question that you can make money by packing and stacking people. meadowlander Aug 2019 #29
Those are culturally determined "needs" Recursion Aug 2019 #30
And get dysentery and tuberculosis and all manner of other communicable diseases at a much higher meadowlander Aug 2019 #32
Because they don't have running water Recursion Aug 2019 #39
Lack of legroom causes dvt just for starters. MrsCoffee Aug 2019 #44
When I lived in China, meadowlander Aug 2019 #57
No argument can be based on the profit motives of landlords. procon Aug 2019 #42
sacrificing safety and health to cram more people Takket Aug 2019 #24
noooooooooooooooooooooooo. just no. dangerous and depressing. no windows. no quiet. Demovictory9 Aug 2019 #9
So live in Jersey or Staten Island Recursion Aug 2019 #13
This is race-to-the-bottom material, folks. Straw Man Aug 2019 #14
Creative...maybe...but not if the rats end up stoop-shouldered griloco Aug 2019 #20
Equivalent to not paying living wage n/t delisen Aug 2019 #22
Many think you should be happy with a coffin sized box to live in. RandiFan1290 Aug 2019 #27
Can you imagine what slumlords like drumpf and Kushner Takket Aug 2019 #28
Um no. Code exists for a reason. tymorial Aug 2019 #31
I don't think so Dorian Gray Aug 2019 #34
You Sound Like A Landlord Me. Aug 2019 #36
+1000 Cal Carpenter Aug 2019 #61
Article with pictures of these units: tblue37 Aug 2019 #40
One brief glimpse of a photo, then paywall Hekate Aug 2019 #48
?? I don't subscribe, but I didn't hit a paywall. nt tblue37 Aug 2019 #49
I'll try again later. It had a banner demand to donate that just kept repeating as I scrolled down Hekate Aug 2019 #50
When I read the article I wondered Retrograde Aug 2019 #58
It would make a cruel kind of sense. The OP's contention that this was altruistic rings hollow.... Hekate Aug 2019 #59
And they still look like total shitholes. smirkymonkey Aug 2019 #56
Oh hell no, just thinking about living in tight spaces like that makes claustrophobic Amishman Aug 2019 #41
What the fuck? Maybe Trump can start charging rent for a spot in those cages. MrsCoffee Aug 2019 #43
The Legend of the 7 1/2th Floor. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2019 #47
As a NYer, I'm shocked! Shocked! I tell you... Yavin4 Aug 2019 #51
Ask the folks in the Ghost Ship building in Oakland wryter2000 Aug 2019 #52
Not to mention the unauthorized duct work sdfernando Aug 2019 #53
Rewarding slumlords shouldn't be popular here. kcr Aug 2019 #54
People should not accept this. chowder66 Aug 2019 #55
NPR has it: link Hekate Aug 2019 #60

Hekate

(90,562 posts)
1. No. Just no. Hamburgered plumbing and electricity? Having to crawl in? Nothing up to code?
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:47 AM
Aug 2019

This is a death-trap-in-waiting.

I've seen photo-essays of extremely tiny NYC apartments already in existence. About all I can say is at least you can stand up and lie down as needed.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. There's not a single building in the Lower East Side that's up to code
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:52 AM
Aug 2019

Yes, it's going to need fire exit improvements. But if we want Manhattan to be an affordable place to live this is the size of the apartment we need to go back to.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
5. Manhattan is never going to be an affordable place to live.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:19 AM
Aug 2019

Rent control a % of apartments for low income workers and everyone else can get over themselves and commute from Jersey. The trains run every ten minutes.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
17. Finite space. Infinite demand.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:16 AM
Aug 2019

Absent some form of regulatory intervention (like rent control) carving up smaller and smaller spaces and sacrificing basic health, safety and dignity won't achieve affordable housing. If you let everyone do this, these apartments would still be going for $2,000 a month in a few years.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. Come on, Manhattan has had the strictest rent control in the country for 70 years now
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:39 AM
Aug 2019

They've been living under an "emergency rent declaration" since 1947. It doesn't work; the only thing that works is building more housing.

Dorian Gray

(13,479 posts)
35. In the past
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:27 AM
Aug 2019

people lived in tenements. Families of 7 in a teeny tiny apartment on the LES. They also worked in those very same apartments during the day. And they were not in good condition ,nor were they safe.

MichMan

(11,869 posts)
37. Why are they still allowed to rent them out if they violate codes?
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 07:22 AM
Aug 2019

Building codes exist for a reason. Are landlords and building owners not expected to follow laws?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
38. Why are local governments so often corrupt and easily captured...
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 07:28 AM
Aug 2019

... by the forces they are supposed to regulate?

RockRaven

(14,907 posts)
3. 4.5 foot ceilings? That's a death trap. EMS and Fire cannot get in there in emergencies.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:13 AM
Aug 2019

Higher density and lower cost housing is great... if it is reasonably safe. While some zoning laws and building codes *are* about NIMBY-ism and enacted at the behest of the rich/powerful, a hell of a lot of them are about keeping people alive. That's why we cannot cheer willy-nilly about them being violated just because it temporarily resulted in lower rents for a handful of people.

Here in northern CA a few years back something made national headlines -- there were some people who tried to deal with high housing costs by adding living spaces without permits and against codes. Three dozen people died in a fire. The manslaughter trials are still on-going. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakland_Ghost_Ship_fire

RockRaven

(14,907 posts)
18. Pointing to Tokyo as an exemplar only proves my point -- done within the rules.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:33 AM
Aug 2019

Japan is one of the most rule-following-est places around. As a general rule and to a much higher degree than in the US, their high density housing meets the safety standards that their society has agreed are necessary and appropriate. The construction discussed in your article does not -- which is the entire basis for the article.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
26. Obviously the additions need to be torn down and everything built to code
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:46 AM
Aug 2019

But right now it's illegal to rent to that many people in that space. If it were legal, he could hire an actual contractor to build 18 standable rooms with sleeping cubbies, like you see in Tokyo.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
4. If people were dogs you wouldn't be allowed to keep them in those conditions.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:16 AM
Aug 2019

One bathroom split between nine strangers?

And that's not even getting into the fire hazards.


They are slum landlords - throw the book at them.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. I've shared bathrooms with more than 9 people
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:33 AM
Aug 2019

Hell it was standard in SROs in the 50s to share one with the whole floor.

BeyondGeography

(39,351 posts)
33. Your SRO room with its regulation-height ceiling was a palace compared with these cubby holes
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:07 AM
Aug 2019

I lived in one in the early 80s until I landed a rent stabilized railroad flat for $475/mo. Split two ways it was way cheaper than the $100/week SRO. The landlord was letting the building go to seed but I didn’t care, even though rats were eating through the tiles of my dropped ceiling and they were so big the ceiling would move as they scurried about. Actually, I did care, but then I would think back to my SRO.

It’s sad what has happened with NYC housing. There are no easy answers but turning part of the housing stock into Hong Kong on a bad day isn’t one of them.

procon

(15,805 posts)
6. No! WTF are you thinking?
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:21 AM
Aug 2019

Don't give a free pass to the greedy landlords who put money over the safety of the tenets. Imagine the death toll if there was a fire in a rabbit warren like that. That building would have been a death trap, not only for the residents, but also the rescue personal who would try to save them.

There's no way to paint any sort of excuse for the avarice of anyone who put money over the lives of others.

They can build tiny apartments that comply with safety codes. Certainly not 18, but as many that would comply with heath and safety codes. I've build 3 homes and certain conditions must be met before any space is certified as fit for human occupancy. A standard door egress would be one, the ability to stand upright, and not be in danger of faulty electrical and water services would likewise be a requirement.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. So fix the fire exits
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:34 AM
Aug 2019

If we want people to be able to live in expensive cities we need to find ways to build very small places for them to live very close together.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
16. It's not about the fire exits being broken,
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:13 AM
Aug 2019

it's about the time it takes ten people to crawl on their knees out of a room designed for two people to be able to run out of and the ability of emergency services to access the rooms with their equipment.

procon

(15,805 posts)
19. What good would that do?
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:48 AM
Aug 2019

There was a photo that showed a common hallway that was only 2 ft wide and only tall enough that adults were forced to their knees. Now picture a firefighter in full turnout gear who couldn't even physically get into that hallway let alone enter any on the luliputian apt doorways.

What if you were a tenant trying to get out along with every other tenent and everyone was trapped in a 2 x 4ft. crawlspace. If just one person went down, the whole queue would be stuck. You'd all die.

Fire exits are only one aspect of the omitted safety precautions. There are better low cost housing schemes in place in many cities. But the larger problem is no one wants to relinquish prime real estate for cheap housing units when they could make a fortune with upscale units instead. TPTB lack the leadership strength to make dedicated set asides for affordable urban housing.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
21. Hold on, think about what you just wrote
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:30 AM
Aug 2019
no one wants to relinquish prime real estate for cheap housing units when they could make a fortune with upscale units instead

Hold on. This guy converted 2 luxe condos to 18 ratholes because it made him more money. I find this intriguing because it proves that you can rent out affordable property profitably in Manhattan at the right density.

Roy Rolling

(6,908 posts)
25. Wrong
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:45 AM
Aug 2019

A 5-foot high ceiling is not ”at the right density”.
End of story. That is the “right density” for someone who is , maximum, 5-feet tall.
Humans are taller than that in NYC.
Please rethink your concept of what is a livable place. Also, residing in close proximity to the heart of NYC commercial district will never be “cheap”—until commercial real estate drops in value.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
29. There was never any question that you can make money by packing and stacking people.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:50 AM
Aug 2019

The point is that people need access to natural sunlight and air and enough living space to stretch their legs, have some privacy, carry out basic living functions like cooking, washing themselves, and using the bathroom, and store some of their belongings like clothes.

New York has already tried "pack em and stack em". They're called slum tenements. And they were a serious health hazard. That's why we have building codes.

Here's the face of "affordable Manhattan living" for you:





https://thumbs-prod.si-cdn.com/ikYyMcR9CsdXLAQDGaon1c9EF6s=/1072x720/filters:no_upscale()/





I'm sure these landlords made a killing. Not really the point though, is it?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
30. Those are culturally determined "needs"
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:58 AM
Aug 2019
The point is that people need access to natural sunlight and air and enough living space to stretch their legs, have some privacy, carry out basic living functions like cooking, washing themselves, and using the bathroom, and store some of their belongings like clothes.

Or rather, it's culturally determined that those things need to be available in the place you sleep. Middle class people in Mumbai live in chowls where they share a kitchen and bathroom with the rest of the floor, and do their laundry in the courtyard. There's not much space, but you're only in there for sleeping, and it's the only way to fit that many people in the city.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
32. And get dysentery and tuberculosis and all manner of other communicable diseases at a much higher
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:03 AM
Aug 2019

rate than in the US.

They are not "culturally determined" needs. There is a wealth of medical research that shows the health impacts of overcrowding.

Building and zoning codes were not just pulled out of someone's ass one day as a way to drive up housing costs. They were a response to a wave of pandemics and fires that killed tens of thousands of people in the late 19th and early 20th century and which were directly attributable to poor housing quality.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
39. Because they don't have running water
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 07:30 AM
Aug 2019

It's not lack of legroom that causes cholera; it's lack of toilets that flush.

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
44. Lack of legroom causes dvt just for starters.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 08:46 AM
Aug 2019

That’s what killed my brother because he was sleeping in his car.

The inspectors had to kneel down to get in the doors of those units? Yeah, that’s super creative.

Super creative way to make money.

Unreal.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
57. When I lived in China,
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:13 PM
Aug 2019

where I had an apartment with a 8' ceiling BTW the same as everyone else even the little grandmas in public housing, I once taught an English class of about 25-30 students about different kinds of injuries. I asked how many had scars. All of them.

What was the most common cause? Burns from space heaters. More than half of them had injured themselves as children or teens by falling asleep and knocking into them.

procon

(15,805 posts)
42. No argument can be based on the profit motives of landlords.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 08:11 AM
Aug 2019

Health and safety codes are based on a minimum standard of living to protect people. This varies by location as the dangers of a tenement fire in a crowded city is far greater than a shed fire in a rural area.

Landlords can't be relied upon, or expected to be philanthropists and build low cost housing on their city properties. That's where government is needed to come up with workable housing solutions and the funding to acquire properties and make a substantial number of new low cost units available.

This isn't a third world county (yet) and although those Chinese landlords tried, it's unlikely you'll see many buildings like the one in the article, so let's not go backward and pine for an open drain hand laundry. Open dormitory lodging, shared kitchen space and community bathrooms are fine for youth hostels., but that's not a permanent home.

Takket

(21,529 posts)
24. sacrificing safety and health to cram more people
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:43 AM
Aug 2019

Into a smaller space is not a solution. We don’t NEED to do that just so more people can live in Manhattan. We have building codes for a reason.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. So live in Jersey or Staten Island
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:36 AM
Aug 2019

If I could have found a 5-foot-tall cubbyhole to sleep and keep my crap in for $600 when I was a bachelor I would have leapt at the chance.

Straw Man

(6,622 posts)
14. This is race-to-the-bottom material, folks.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:00 AM
Aug 2019

It's ostensibly the kind of thing immigrants come here to avoid. Reward this? Never. The demand for housing in Manhattan is inexhaustible. If this kind of thing is tolerated, it will become the norm.

There are other and safer ways to do high-density living. This is just greed-driven profiteering.

delisen

(6,042 posts)
22. Equivalent to not paying living wage n/t
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:37 AM
Aug 2019

We could be designing and building fabulous new earthquake and tornado resistant earth-friendly and people-friendly cities on pillars.

Takket

(21,529 posts)
28. Can you imagine what slumlords like drumpf and Kushner
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:47 AM
Aug 2019

Would do is this became the norm? Not to mention that if decent sized and safe apartments became more rare their cost would soar even more of these “cages” would pop up. And then landlords will just charge more for them!

Dorian Gray

(13,479 posts)
34. I don't think so
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:25 AM
Aug 2019

Everything was unsafe and the landlords did this out of greed, not charity.

Yes, rent is out of control. But landlords like this are NOT heroes.

The illegal changes they made to the apartments could cause all sorts of long term damage. It's dangerous to live without everything up to code/inspected. And if there was a fire in that building, what types of escape routes were there for the people?

Hekate

(90,562 posts)
50. I'll try again later. It had a banner demand to donate that just kept repeating as I scrolled down
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 01:28 PM
Aug 2019

Someone mentioned the landlords were Chinese. Oh how adorable. They don't understand our soft and decadent ways, so perhaps this is one solution for their workers who get smuggled in on container ships. Yes, that is a thing.

Retrograde

(10,130 posts)
58. When I read the article I wondered
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:42 PM
Aug 2019

how many of the occupants were undocumented and therefore unlikely to complain about their living conditions.

Hekate

(90,562 posts)
59. It would make a cruel kind of sense. The OP's contention that this was altruistic rings hollow....
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:48 PM
Aug 2019

...especially once you find out who the landlords are.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
56. And they still look like total shitholes.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:05 PM
Aug 2019

I would have at least thought they would be clean and modern looking. Ugh!

Amishman

(5,554 posts)
41. Oh hell no, just thinking about living in tight spaces like that makes claustrophobic
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 08:05 AM
Aug 2019

I'll stay out here with the deer and the cows, thank you

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
43. What the fuck? Maybe Trump can start charging rent for a spot in those cages.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 08:36 AM
Aug 2019

Wouldn’t that be creative?

I can’t even....

wryter2000

(46,023 posts)
52. Ask the folks in the Ghost Ship building in Oakland
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 01:48 PM
Aug 2019

About unsafe wiring.

Edited to add: You can't. They're dead.

chowder66

(9,055 posts)
55. People should not accept this.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:32 PM
Aug 2019

We need more housing so it becomes affordable and living wages. Accepting this will make this the new normal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2 Condos Were Illegally C...