General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2 Condos Were Illegally Converted Into 18 Micro Apartments In NYC
https://www.npr.org/2019/08/20/752791717/2-condos-were-illegally-converted-into-18-micro-apartments-in-nyc"The ceiling heights were 4.5 feet to 6 feet tall on each level, depending on where you were standing," Department of Buildings spokesperson Abigail Kunitz said in an email to NPR.
When an inspector visited the building this month, he found half-size doors and low ceilings, forcing him to kneel in an improvised hallway. A small staircase connected the two floors. Along with unapproved structural changes, the Department of Buildings says, the inspector found the space riddled with unpermitted electrical and plumbing work.
The compressed living spaces prompted New York City Council Member Ben Kallos to compare the arrangement to the movie Being John Malkovich, which features a cramped office and a tiny door on floor 7 1/2 of a Manhattan building.
OK, this won't be popular, but: we should be rewarding this, not assessing fines. The landlords found a way to get rent down to $600 in the Lower East Side. We need denser living spaces in high-rent cities, and this is a pretty creative example of one.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)This is a death-trap-in-waiting.
I've seen photo-essays of extremely tiny NYC apartments already in existence. About all I can say is at least you can stand up and lie down as needed.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Yes, it's going to need fire exit improvements. But if we want Manhattan to be an affordable place to live this is the size of the apartment we need to go back to.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)Rent control a % of apartments for low income workers and everyone else can get over themselves and commute from Jersey. The trains run every ten minutes.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)meadowlander
(4,388 posts)Absent some form of regulatory intervention (like rent control) carving up smaller and smaller spaces and sacrificing basic health, safety and dignity won't achieve affordable housing. If you let everyone do this, these apartments would still be going for $2,000 a month in a few years.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)They've been living under an "emergency rent declaration" since 1947. It doesn't work; the only thing that works is building more housing.
Dorian Gray
(13,479 posts)people lived in tenements. Families of 7 in a teeny tiny apartment on the LES. They also worked in those very same apartments during the day. And they were not in good condition ,nor were they safe.
MichMan
(11,869 posts)Building codes exist for a reason. Are landlords and building owners not expected to follow laws?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)... by the forces they are supposed to regulate?
RockRaven
(14,907 posts)Higher density and lower cost housing is great... if it is reasonably safe. While some zoning laws and building codes *are* about NIMBY-ism and enacted at the behest of the rich/powerful, a hell of a lot of them are about keeping people alive. That's why we cannot cheer willy-nilly about them being violated just because it temporarily resulted in lower rents for a handful of people.
Here in northern CA a few years back something made national headlines -- there were some people who tried to deal with high housing costs by adding living spaces without permits and against codes. Three dozen people died in a fire. The manslaughter trials are still on-going. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakland_Ghost_Ship_fire
Hekate
(90,562 posts)912gdm
(959 posts)Demovictory9
(32,423 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)RockRaven
(14,907 posts)Japan is one of the most rule-following-est places around. As a general rule and to a much higher degree than in the US, their high density housing meets the safety standards that their society has agreed are necessary and appropriate. The construction discussed in your article does not -- which is the entire basis for the article.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But right now it's illegal to rent to that many people in that space. If it were legal, he could hire an actual contractor to build 18 standable rooms with sleeping cubbies, like you see in Tokyo.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)One bathroom split between nine strangers?
And that's not even getting into the fire hazards.
They are slum landlords - throw the book at them.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Hell it was standard in SROs in the 50s to share one with the whole floor.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)I lived in one in the early 80s until I landed a rent stabilized railroad flat for $475/mo. Split two ways it was way cheaper than the $100/week SRO. The landlord was letting the building go to seed but I didnt care, even though rats were eating through the tiles of my dropped ceiling and they were so big the ceiling would move as they scurried about. Actually, I did care, but then I would think back to my SRO.
Its sad what has happened with NYC housing. There are no easy answers but turning part of the housing stock into Hong Kong on a bad day isnt one of them.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Don't give a free pass to the greedy landlords who put money over the safety of the tenets. Imagine the death toll if there was a fire in a rabbit warren like that. That building would have been a death trap, not only for the residents, but also the rescue personal who would try to save them.
There's no way to paint any sort of excuse for the avarice of anyone who put money over the lives of others.
They can build tiny apartments that comply with safety codes. Certainly not 18, but as many that would comply with heath and safety codes. I've build 3 homes and certain conditions must be met before any space is certified as fit for human occupancy. A standard door egress would be one, the ability to stand upright, and not be in danger of faulty electrical and water services would likewise be a requirement.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If we want people to be able to live in expensive cities we need to find ways to build very small places for them to live very close together.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)it's about the time it takes ten people to crawl on their knees out of a room designed for two people to be able to run out of and the ability of emergency services to access the rooms with their equipment.
procon
(15,805 posts)There was a photo that showed a common hallway that was only 2 ft wide and only tall enough that adults were forced to their knees. Now picture a firefighter in full turnout gear who couldn't even physically get into that hallway let alone enter any on the luliputian apt doorways.
What if you were a tenant trying to get out along with every other tenent and everyone was trapped in a 2 x 4ft. crawlspace. If just one person went down, the whole queue would be stuck. You'd all die.
Fire exits are only one aspect of the omitted safety precautions. There are better low cost housing schemes in place in many cities. But the larger problem is no one wants to relinquish prime real estate for cheap housing units when they could make a fortune with upscale units instead. TPTB lack the leadership strength to make dedicated set asides for affordable urban housing.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Hold on. This guy converted 2 luxe condos to 18 ratholes because it made him more money. I find this intriguing because it proves that you can rent out affordable property profitably in Manhattan at the right density.
Roy Rolling
(6,908 posts)A 5-foot high ceiling is not at the right density.
End of story. That is the right density for someone who is , maximum, 5-feet tall.
Humans are taller than that in NYC.
Please rethink your concept of what is a livable place. Also, residing in close proximity to the heart of NYC commercial district will never be cheapuntil commercial real estate drops in value.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)The point is that people need access to natural sunlight and air and enough living space to stretch their legs, have some privacy, carry out basic living functions like cooking, washing themselves, and using the bathroom, and store some of their belongings like clothes.
New York has already tried "pack em and stack em". They're called slum tenements. And they were a serious health hazard. That's why we have building codes.
Here's the face of "affordable Manhattan living" for you:
https://thumbs-prod.si-cdn.com/ikYyMcR9CsdXLAQDGaon1c9EF6s=/1072x720/filters:no_upscale()/
I'm sure these landlords made a killing. Not really the point though, is it?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Or rather, it's culturally determined that those things need to be available in the place you sleep. Middle class people in Mumbai live in chowls where they share a kitchen and bathroom with the rest of the floor, and do their laundry in the courtyard. There's not much space, but you're only in there for sleeping, and it's the only way to fit that many people in the city.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)rate than in the US.
They are not "culturally determined" needs. There is a wealth of medical research that shows the health impacts of overcrowding.
Building and zoning codes were not just pulled out of someone's ass one day as a way to drive up housing costs. They were a response to a wave of pandemics and fires that killed tens of thousands of people in the late 19th and early 20th century and which were directly attributable to poor housing quality.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's not lack of legroom that causes cholera; it's lack of toilets that flush.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Thats what killed my brother because he was sleeping in his car.
The inspectors had to kneel down to get in the doors of those units? Yeah, thats super creative.
Super creative way to make money.
Unreal.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)where I had an apartment with a 8' ceiling BTW the same as everyone else even the little grandmas in public housing, I once taught an English class of about 25-30 students about different kinds of injuries. I asked how many had scars. All of them.
What was the most common cause? Burns from space heaters. More than half of them had injured themselves as children or teens by falling asleep and knocking into them.
procon
(15,805 posts)Health and safety codes are based on a minimum standard of living to protect people. This varies by location as the dangers of a tenement fire in a crowded city is far greater than a shed fire in a rural area.
Landlords can't be relied upon, or expected to be philanthropists and build low cost housing on their city properties. That's where government is needed to come up with workable housing solutions and the funding to acquire properties and make a substantial number of new low cost units available.
This isn't a third world county (yet) and although those Chinese landlords tried, it's unlikely you'll see many buildings like the one in the article, so let's not go backward and pine for an open drain hand laundry. Open dormitory lodging, shared kitchen space and community bathrooms are fine for youth hostels., but that's not a permanent home.
Takket
(21,529 posts)Into a smaller space is not a solution. We dont NEED to do that just so more people can live in Manhattan. We have building codes for a reason.
Demovictory9
(32,423 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)If I could have found a 5-foot-tall cubbyhole to sleep and keep my crap in for $600 when I was a bachelor I would have leapt at the chance.
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)It's ostensibly the kind of thing immigrants come here to avoid. Reward this? Never. The demand for housing in Manhattan is inexhaustible. If this kind of thing is tolerated, it will become the norm.
There are other and safer ways to do high-density living. This is just greed-driven profiteering.
griloco
(832 posts)(Credit to Bob Hope)
http://onceuponasmile.blogspot.com/2007/04/in-days-of-yore.html?m=1
delisen
(6,042 posts)We could be designing and building fabulous new earthquake and tornado resistant earth-friendly and people-friendly cities on pillars.
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)Just don't touch their tax cuts
Takket
(21,529 posts)Would do is this became the norm? Not to mention that if decent sized and safe apartments became more rare their cost would soar even more of these cages would pop up. And then landlords will just charge more for them!
tymorial
(3,433 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,479 posts)Everything was unsafe and the landlords did this out of greed, not charity.
Yes, rent is out of control. But landlords like this are NOT heroes.
The illegal changes they made to the apartments could cause all sorts of long term damage. It's dangerous to live without everything up to code/inspected. And if there was a fire in that building, what types of escape routes were there for the people?
Me.
(35,454 posts)tblue37
(65,227 posts)Hekate
(90,562 posts)Not your fault
tblue37
(65,227 posts)Hekate
(90,562 posts)Someone mentioned the landlords were Chinese. Oh how adorable. They don't understand our soft and decadent ways, so perhaps this is one solution for their workers who get smuggled in on container ships. Yes, that is a thing.
Retrograde
(10,130 posts)how many of the occupants were undocumented and therefore unlikely to complain about their living conditions.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)...especially once you find out who the landlords are.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I would have at least thought they would be clean and modern looking. Ugh!
Amishman
(5,554 posts)I'll stay out here with the deer and the cows, thank you
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Wouldnt that be creative?
I cant even....
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)Yavin4
(35,421 posts)that this wasn't a Trump or Kushner property.
wryter2000
(46,023 posts)About unsafe wiring.
Edited to add: You can't. They're dead.
sdfernando
(4,927 posts)Where's Bob Hoskins when you need him?!?!?
kcr
(15,315 posts)Nor should it be tolerated.
chowder66
(9,055 posts)We need more housing so it becomes affordable and living wages. Accepting this will make this the new normal.